View Single Post
degreeoff1 degreeoff1 is offline
Registered User
degreeoff1's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 441
Once again, it seems that many are in agreement that there are gains to be made in porting the heads. However, there is a consensus that it is difficult to achieve. this I do not understand. For example, the 1972/3 2.4S heads had 36mm intake and exhaust ports while the 2.4 E heads had 32mm intake and exhaust ports. Both had the same valves and the 2.4S was a perfectly streetable engine but has ports 26% larger.
Ran across this in a thread.....So I know the port sizes for the S's........ How hard is it to make an "E" head an"S" head? Even wayne's book list's this as a port size to use in my eng's future config..... I am so blind somtimes....
Old 06-20-2005, 11:27 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)