[lendaddy]

Originally posted by kach22i
A or B?

A: Devos laid off over a thousand Michigan workers, then invested millions in China and provided them with thousands of jobs.

B: Devos invested millions in China providing them with thousands of jobs. He then laid off over a thousand Michigan workers.

Is it the sequence of events which you wish to argue?

Seems silly as the end result is the same.

Seriously, what in there contradicts what the advertisements have been saying?

Both are true. But the products made in China are sold in China (as required by them). This is new business to them not the transfer of jobs. You can certainly comprehend that. Your not claiming the product sold in China was previously made here in Michigan are you?

Every business has to lay off workers from time to time, this should exclude him?