[Overpaid Slacker]

Not sure this theory will work, but Rich Lowry did a pretty good job of cataloging the ridiculously deficient memories of the prosecution's witnesses.

In a trial where the defendant is claiming not to have remembered accurately, having each (and I think it was every) witness for the prosecution essentially admit to not having remembered, or having changed Grand Jury testimony... doesn't amount to much of an airtight "our witness' memories are better than your defendant (whose guilt we have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt)".

I'll post links to some of the articles (or the text of a few that I've saved) if anyone is interested.

JP