View Single Post
NathanUK NathanUK is offline
A fellow Pelacanite
 
NathanUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,002
Garage
I still think the recirc valve is better as the turbo should keep spinning faster longer. Why waste the energy we've put into the turbo.
As for engine braking, that can be useful but I didn't really drive my 930 long enough to decide if it needed more than it already had. My car has the factory LSD which did seem to make the car push when lifting off compared to my 911 carrera with no LSD. This pushing was easily corrected when the boost came in
I know at low speeds my carrera would benefit from some more engine breaking, especially if you are in 2nd at low revs when you should be in 1st and nearer 4K. Maybe the 4spd 930 tranny makes more engine braking even more desirable?
These cars are already famous for lift off oversteer (loose for USA)!!!
__________________
1981 UK 930. G50/01 shortened, 964 3.8RS Fibreglass Body Kit, 18" Alloys 8.5" F & 10" R, 225's F & 285's R, Special Colour Metallic Blue Paint, FIA Sparco Evo's, A/C and Air Pump removed, Electronic Boost Controller, GHL Headers, Tial46 WG.
Fitting - New service kit.
Needs Fitting - Innovate XD-16 Kit, Kokeln IC. Stephen's K27 HFS, EVO Intake Assy & his Modded USA Fuel Head.

1983 UK 911 3.2 Carrera Sport Coupe. Black, Black Leather with Red Piping, Black Alloy Gear Knob, K&N Air Filter Element, Turbo Tie rods.
Needs Fitting - K&N CO Sensor, Round A/F Dial Gauge, Factory Short Shift Kit.

http://www.danasoft.com/sig/Iamnotanumber.jpg

Last edited by NathanUK; 10-12-2008 at 12:52 PM..
Old 10-12-2008, 12:48 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #43 (permalink)