View Single Post
BarryJB BarryJB is offline
Uno Dei Molti Porschisti
BarryJB's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Elfin Forest, CA
Posts: 332
[QUOTE=turbo3six;6471953]265/45/16 is just an 'ok' substitute... because it is a taller tire, with a larger sidewall, diameter, radius and circumfrence yielding a 7.2% variance to the original 245/45/16

Respectfully - I believe your math is off - 245/45-16 diameter is 24.7 in, 265/45-16 diameter is 25.4 in, which is only 2.9%, not 7.2%. Also another stock tire size on rear was 225/50-16, which has a diameter of 24.9, which makes the % change compared to the 265's even smaller - 2.1%. (I did it on my calculator but there's a cool online tire-size calculator

I have the 265/45-16 XS on my car and love them, they are way better than the SO2 & SO3 combo I used to use for a while (neither type was offered in the required two sizes) - IMO to brand them as "just ok" is "just not the case"! For me, they are easily the best UHP tires I ever had on my car in the 180k and 13 years I've enjoyed. Pressures are critical though, I've settled on F-32psi (225/50), and R-33psi (265/45) for best temps and feel.

Agreed, the Toyo RA1 is indeed a great choice (in light of the Kumho 265 demise ;-)

Also, the Nexen site lists both 225/50-16 & 245/45-16 for the N3000... if other Pelicans like them (see infraredCalvin's post), they will be certainly cheap fun until we move to 17's...
85 Carrera Coupe, OBD-I 993 3.6 conversion w/(ever-increasing list of mods)óclosing in on 425,000 miles. So far, 100,000 on the 3.6. Mad Wasp (Benelli TnT 1130).

Last edited by BarryJB; 01-04-2012 at 09:13 AM.. Reason: added link
Old 01-04-2012, 09:10 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #62 (permalink)