![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
1% Leakdown realistic on 80k mile car?
In preparation for selling my '86 930 I did a compression and a leakdown test on the engine today.
This is on a cold engine with 80k miles that has not been run in a few weeks. My compressions were performed simply by connecting the pressure tester with all plugs out, and cranking the engine a few seconds with WOT. All were 105-110psi. I measured the leakdown with my ATS differential pressure tester that I use on my airplanes. Rotated the engine to TDC compression stroke cylinder by cylinder, and used 100psi as the control pressure. Every cylinder was 98 or 99 psi. That is 1-2% leakdown. I did this twice around to make sure I did it correctly. These numbers aren't what I was expecting. I was expecting the compression to be a little higher, and the leakdown to be a lot lower. Is it really reasonable to expect 1-2% leakdown or did I do something wrong? To validate the tester was working correctly I watched the gauge as I (carefully) went past TDC and it did suddenly drop as the exhaust valve opened. I'm just surprised by the numbers I suppose.
__________________
'86 no-sunroof 930 coupe: Emissions removed, FrankenCIS controlling eWUR, lambda, COP ignition. Tial f46P 1.0 bar spring, SC cams, K-27/29, lightweight clutch, TK Longneck intercooler, RarlyL8 headers and dual-outlet hooligan '14 Jaguar XK-R: Bullet proof windscreen, rotating number plates (valid all European countries), martini mixer, whatever you do don't press this red button! Last edited by flightlead404; 07-16-2023 at 03:33 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 1,236
|
What’s the problem? 1-2% leakdown is perfect.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,469
|
__________________
Ole Skool - wouldn't have it any other way |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I guess I was just feeling it was a little too perfect
I was expecting in the mid-90% range. Its pretty hard to mess that test up though. At least, its hard to mess it up to make the pressure read higher (leakdown be lower). I just never see that kind of result on airplane engines, especially not mid-time engines. Never done it on a car before.
__________________
'86 no-sunroof 930 coupe: Emissions removed, FrankenCIS controlling eWUR, lambda, COP ignition. Tial f46P 1.0 bar spring, SC cams, K-27/29, lightweight clutch, TK Longneck intercooler, RarlyL8 headers and dual-outlet hooligan '14 Jaguar XK-R: Bullet proof windscreen, rotating number plates (valid all European countries), martini mixer, whatever you do don't press this red button! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,611
|
Leakdown is fine. Compression gauges vary. Specifically, the amount of tension on the spring inside the shrader valve in the end of the plug adapter. Try a different gauge.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It's possible that since your car sat for several weeks some engine oil seeped into the cylinders. This may contribute to 'false' comp readings. I think it's best to do a compression test shortly after warming up the engine.
__________________
MikeD '87 930 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
My compression might be lower because I have a higher lift, longer duration cam in there.
Oil in the cylinder would see out, not in, but would generally give both a higher compression and better leakdown. The compression and leakdown numbers being consistent across the board is good. IDK why I'm complaining about such good numbers lol
__________________
'86 no-sunroof 930 coupe: Emissions removed, FrankenCIS controlling eWUR, lambda, COP ignition. Tial f46P 1.0 bar spring, SC cams, K-27/29, lightweight clutch, TK Longneck intercooler, RarlyL8 headers and dual-outlet hooligan '14 Jaguar XK-R: Bullet proof windscreen, rotating number plates (valid all European countries), martini mixer, whatever you do don't press this red button! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,347
|
On most other cars even 10% leak down is great
|
||
![]() |
|