![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Park Hills, KY
Posts: 2,502
|
Quote:
dont recall where I read this but true, 'the 911 is easy to drive hard and hard to drive easy' ![]()
__________________
Bob Cox 84 928S, Ruby Red linen/brown interior - preferred DD 87 924S resurrect and gut and another track car... 86 944 turbo my new DE/track car. 78 930 clone project car. |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 19,566
|
Quote:
The 1.04 was an arbitrary example. It just happened to be the next shorter 3rd gear past the 1.00 you are considering. I make both ratios, but the point of the post was that what you've been thinking about is "good enough" and making small changes won't even be noticeable. What will be noticeable is how much different any of these options is from what you have now. Available ratios can be viewed on our website: 930 Gears | Guard Transmission Not all ratios listed are kept in stock. Some are by order only. The popular ratios, which include the ones you are considering, are on the shelf. Regards, Matt
__________________
1974 911 Restorod 1974 914 Bumble Bee 2004 40 Jahre 2008 Cayman S Mule |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the Link to your website! I looked over some of the gears and the optional gear ratios in the range I'm looking for are greater than I anticipated. I will be plugging some into the gear chart that I'm using to see what the RPM spread is. Would it be better to keep the lower gears closer, ratio wise or, or th ehigher gears? Thanks, Rahl |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 19,566
|
The reason I like the 2nd gear you are considering is the functionality I described in my first post. It works within the mph range one would expect on back country roads.
__________________
1974 911 Restorod 1974 914 Bumble Bee 2004 40 Jahre 2008 Cayman S Mule |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|