Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   Cylinder Measurement/Tolerances (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/1013027-cylinder-measurement-tolerances.html)

jamesjedi 11-13-2018 01:22 PM

Cylinder Measurement/Tolerances
 
I am defining the process of measuring a cylinder. I understand the process of visual inspection for scratches and scuffs. I am trying to learn more about the measurement process.

I have Wayne's book. What is the difference between "nominal diameter" and "cylinder diameter"?

Wayne's book shows measurements at four different measurements. Two are at the top of the cylinder, just above the cooling fin (a cross pattern). And two are where the smooth part of the out cylinder wall start.

Using this information, what is considered a fail number?

Thanks for any help.

James

Trackrash 11-13-2018 02:28 PM

It is two measurements top and bottom at right angles. You are checking for taper, and out of round. Generally speaking, if you have 0.002" inch or more of either, the cylinder is worn out.

jamesjedi 11-13-2018 02:37 PM

Correct...I Should edit it. There are four measurements.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trackrash (Post 10250523)
It is two measurements top and bottom at right angles. You are checking for taper, and out of round. Generally speaking, if you have 0.002" inch or more of either, the cylinder is warn out.

The above is in inches? Are the measurements in Wayne's book not in Metric?

Trackrash 11-13-2018 02:53 PM

True, I am using inches. I am giving rounded off numbers. All of my old school measuring stuff is in inches. I made some notes in my Wayne's book converting to inches. IIRC the new specs are something like 0.0015" out. The wear limit is something like 0.002". If you are reusing rings, pistons and cylinders and are close to 0.002" taper or ovality, it would be time to make some decisions. Much over that and you would probably be wasting your time, if you wanted a motor that would not smoke and would last.

jamesjedi 11-14-2018 06:55 AM

I would think an inexpensive bore gauge should work?

Mark Henry 11-14-2018 03:09 PM

Nikasil when worn doesn't get a ridge like an iron cylinder, it gets wavy around the last 3/4" of the top stroke. It can also bellmouth (Fish mouth) the bore as well.
The Nikasil can "look" good and still have these issues.
My 3.0 cylinders were like this.

KTL 11-15-2018 09:05 PM

You don't need to spend a bank account on a bore gauge but you do need to ensure the dial indicator for the gauge is sufficient. You need one that measures 0.0001" increments, not the cheaper 0.0005" increment. Fowler makes a decent bore gauge kit but their included indicator gauge is only a 0.0005" unit. I bought a replacement 0.0001" indicator to "upgrade" my Fowler kits

In order to set the bore gauge you also need to have a decent micrometer (also 0.0001" resolution) because the inexpensive bore gauges are comparator style, not direct-reading.

tom1394racing 11-16-2018 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesjedi (Post 10251231)
I would think an inexpensive bore gauge should work?

I have been using the bore garage available from Eastwood for about 10 years now. That gauge, combined with a good micrometer set I bought on EBay, provides sufficiently accurate and repeatable measurement on cylinder and case bores. A great tool.

jamesjedi 11-16-2018 08:24 AM

Thanks guys. I will look at them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.