I'm not sure what the question is but I'll just shoot some info out there and hope I hit something: :D

3.0SC = 95mm bore, 70.4 stroke
3.2Ca = 95mm bore, 74.4 stroke

3.2SC = 98mm bore, 70.4 stroke
3.4Ca = 98mm bore, 74.4 stroke

-Chris

Chris,

The confusion was the 95mm size. Perhaps I was not paying close enough attention when emailing Steve. Can one do 9.5:1 with 98mm 3.2sc short stroke pistons?

If using J&E pistons, you can do ANY CR you like in any diameter. I have 100mm cyls w/ J&E 10.7:1 in my twin plug SC = 3.32L. About 1.5% smaller than a 3.4 (which is really 3.37L;) I might badge it as a 3.4 so people don't think its a turbo.

SMD

I am running a 3367cc with 98 P&Cs and a 3.2, 74.4 stroke. Typically called a 3.4 long stroke...

Badges? "We don't need no stinking badges" :)

http://standingwave.org/albums/porsche/ali.sized.jpg

You have to tell them if for no other reason than to stop them from crying ;)

What is the most agressive cam sharft profile for MM
 

What is the most agressive cam sharft profile for MM 9.3:1 pistons?

for CIS

and for webbers

Is the 3.3 short stroke the black sheep of the bunch? My father and I just finished one, the dyno numbers were not conclusive but certainly impressive. HP was going up and up and up when they cut the run at 6800 but the cams (john dougherty) were specced for about 7500rpm peak power. The torque was well more than I expected, 299.7ft/lbs at the rear wheels at 6700rpm. Not too bad with stock 78' heads and a couple other add ons....

My dream is to take this motor to 3.5litres with big port/valve heads, racey cams, bespoke intake, bespoke exhaust and a lot of other fun stuff inside. Hoping for numbers equal to or greater than the numbers Henry got from a single plug MFI motor he posted here ages ago. I still have the thread bookmarked if anyone is interested.

Matty, if you are choosing between CSI and Carbs, for performance go with carbs anyday of the week. You can run hotter cams and get more power. With CSI you need to strip it down and warm it up for a bit before driving if you have hot cams. I know, I did it for a while.

Can they bore 3liter cylinders to take 98mm je pistons?

No, the issue is the sealing ring that is present in the tops of the 3.0 cylinders. However, you can substitute a set of 3.2 cylinders bored to 98mm.

Cheers

So you essentially could get a set of used 3.2 cylinders, bore them to 98mm, and use them with the correct pistons on a original 3.0 engine? I want to make sure im reading correctly

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Yes, or you could order sets already made or buy Nickies. https://lnengineering.com/products/aircooled-cylinders-pistons/porsche-911-1978-98.html?p=2

There have been lots of SC cylinders bored, but as mentioned there have been reports of failures.

I think our host sells some of these sets, but I had no luck searching their parts catalog.

Yes,

EBS likely has core cylinders available, or buy a complete Mahle set or LN Engineering with your favourite piston.

We just recently assembled a 3.0-3.2SS where we used bored and plated 3.2 cylinders (98mm) and a custom JE piston. We also have built quite a few 3.2-3.4 bored the same with either a JE or CP piston.

Cheers

Every time I step into an engine build thread in hopes of finding a way to make my 3.0 a stout lil beast... and here I am reading about 175HP uuuug what a useless lil lump of an engine.

FWIW, I still have a bruise on the back of my head from the time I got a ride in my friends car with a 3,0, dynoed at 250 hp, when he shifted from 1st to 2nd.:D

250HP must have been pretty much a full race build to get that out of a 3.0L

250HP is starting to get into the fun range IMO

I have a 800+whp awd VW... I dont need crazy HP in this car. It's so light and fun, completely different type of driving.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

250 HP is relatively easy to obtain. Actually, I miss spoke, his motor is 259 hp, and that is with a stock muffler. I asked him why he didn't have a sport or custom muffler, since that would add another 10 hp easily.

Here is the other end of what is possible to do starting with a 3,0. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/10470387-post792.html

What is he doing to get 259, dual plug, high comp, big cams I would assume.

Only mods are 10 to 1 CP pistons, some big Elgin cams, (he wasn't sure of the specs), single plug, Weber 46s.

He had someone dyno tune and break-in the motor, including re-curving the distributor, and the tuner was confident there was no detonation, due to the cams overlap.

He wasn't spinning the crap out of it either. At the time he had his limiter set at 6500. It is in a 914, so a hundred pounds or so lighter than my car. FWIW my car feels nearly as quick, however he took TTOD at his first AX with it leaving me in the dust.

Also a known engine builder I know in SoCal, was claiming 260 out of an SC motor he built with only cams, exhaust and weber 46s changed.

In Bruce Anderson's book there is a dyno chart of a SS3,2 with around 260 HP with Weber 40s and usable torque at 3000 RPM.

Read the link I put in #56 if you want see what is possible starting with an SC motor and $$$$.

Between the weight advantage and the engine placement, it's hard to beat a 914 for auto-x.

yea, with a metric ton of money anything can make power LOL.

I am trying to figure out what path makes the most senes for my future engine build... 3.0 low comp and a turbo,

3.2ss

or check out the 3.0L and sell it for a 3.6 swap.

The turbo option is definitely worth looking at. It would be interesting to do a cost assessment for the turbo conversion. I would like to see that, if one exists.

I could see twin turbos hanging out the back of my car. The reality is I can't use all the power I have now on the street, but turbos do have a definite appeal.

A 3,6 is the way to go, but the ship has kind of sailed on that one. No question those 3.6s are spectacular performers. However for the money, from what I am seeing now, you could build up an SC motor that could be comparable (I am thinking anyway).

Of course selling the motor you have will offset the cost of a 3,6 to some extent.

Yea, I think a turbo i'd be into the hardware and ECU for $6-8K making about 300RWHP A rebuild to low comp $12-15K

selling my SC engine, $8-9K Maaaaaybe more toward an 18K 3.6L Not sure total cost for ECU and install bits on a 3.6 swap. IF the 3.6 needs a rebuild another $15-18K

rebuild the 3.0L $15K for maybe 250CHP.

for the money the turbo is the best HP per $ by far, but would eat my 915 in a year or two. But in the end you be the most fun of the options.

I see no point in two turbos, modern turbo spool so low that one good turbo makes great power.

Here you go..... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-used-parts-sale-wanted/1038706-930-turbo-system-sold-package-pieces.html

Yea, I saw that... pretty complete kit.

I completely agree. The cost for a donor 3.6 is pretty steep these days and the conversion is +10k depending on the car. So typically, you end up Selling your 3.0 and paying 15-20k for a 3.6 swap. You could build a nice twin plugged beast for that.

However, if you're going +300isch streetable hp, then I would take 3.6.

I've been thinking of adding a turbo to my 3.6....
I'm wondering how much boost you can add to a stock 3.6 intake, plastic and rubber boots everywhere!

If you have access to E85 a turbo kit and EFI would be a sweet upgrade for power.

93oct would be fine in street trim, I worry that my love of power and boost would have me turning the booth up and eating my 915.

recomended heads for3.2ss
 

For those of you with 3.2ss what heads did you use? Wayne mentions either 3.0 or 3.2. My assumption is that is 3.0L heads are used they must be early 3.0 with large valves. Currently my 3.0 (83) has smaller valves.

Thanks

David

Valve sizes are all the same. The later SC ports are smaller, but easily enlarged. 3,2 heads have even larger ports, but they have different studs and the head volume is slightly larger, I have read.

I thought the studs were changed with the 3.6L