Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   Quick FAQ 3.0/3.2 upgrades to 3.2/3.4 (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/147128-quick-faq-3-0-3-2-upgrades-3-2-3-4-a.html)

Trackrash 09-01-2019 10:06 AM

The turbo option is definitely worth looking at. It would be interesting to do a cost assessment for the turbo conversion. I would like to see that, if one exists.

I could see twin turbos hanging out the back of my car. The reality is I can't use all the power I have now on the street, but turbos do have a definite appeal.

A 3,6 is the way to go, but the ship has kind of sailed on that one. No question those 3.6s are spectacular performers. However for the money, from what I am seeing now, you could build up an SC motor that could be comparable (I am thinking anyway).

Of course selling the motor you have will offset the cost of a 3,6 to some extent.

Geronimo 09-01-2019 11:10 AM

Yea, I think a turbo i'd be into the hardware and ECU for $6-8K making about 300RWHP A rebuild to low comp $12-15K

selling my SC engine, $8-9K Maaaaaybe more toward an 18K 3.6L Not sure total cost for ECU and install bits on a 3.6 swap. IF the 3.6 needs a rebuild another $15-18K

rebuild the 3.0L $15K for maybe 250CHP.

for the money the turbo is the best HP per $ by far, but would eat my 915 in a year or two. But in the end you be the most fun of the options.

I see no point in two turbos, modern turbo spool so low that one good turbo makes great power.

Trackrash 09-01-2019 12:29 PM

Here you go..... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-used-parts-sale-wanted/1038706-930-turbo-system-sold-package-pieces.html

Geronimo 09-01-2019 01:57 PM

Yea, I saw that... pretty complete kit.

Nux 09-01-2019 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trackrash (Post 10578257)
The turbo option is definitely worth looking at. It would be interesting to do a cost assessment for the turbo conversion. I would like to see that, if one exists.

I could see twin turbos hanging out the back of my car. The reality is I can't use all the power I have now on the street, but turbos do have a definite appeal.

A 3,6 is the way to go, but the ship has kind of sailed on that one. No question those 3.6s are spectacular performers. However for the money, from what I am seeing now, you could build up an SC motor that could be comparable (I am thinking anyway).

Of course selling the motor you have will offset the cost of a 3,6 to some extent.

I completely agree. The cost for a donor 3.6 is pretty steep these days and the conversion is +10k depending on the car. So typically, you end up Selling your 3.0 and paying 15-20k for a 3.6 swap. You could build a nice twin plugged beast for that.

However, if you're going +300isch streetable hp, then I would take 3.6.

safe 09-02-2019 12:23 AM

I've been thinking of adding a turbo to my 3.6....
I'm wondering how much boost you can add to a stock 3.6 intake, plastic and rubber boots everywhere!

safe 09-02-2019 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geronimo (Post 10578235)
yea, with a metric ton of money anything can make power LOL.

I am trying to figure out what path makes the most senes for my future engine build... 3.0 low comp and a turbo,

3.2ss

or check out the 3.0L and sell it for a 3.6 swap.

If you have access to E85 a turbo kit and EFI would be a sweet upgrade for power.

Geronimo 09-02-2019 09:58 AM

93oct would be fine in street trim, I worry that my love of power and boost would have me turning the booth up and eating my 915.

Harpo 09-06-2019 04:38 PM

recomended heads for3.2ss
 
For those of you with 3.2ss what heads did you use? Wayne mentions either 3.0 or 3.2. My assumption is that is 3.0L heads are used they must be early 3.0 with large valves. Currently my 3.0 (83) has smaller valves.

Thanks

David

Trackrash 09-06-2019 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harpo (Post 10584305)
For those of you with 3.2ss what heads did you use? Wayne mentions either 3.0 or 3.2. My assumption is that is 3.0L heads are used they must be early 3.0 with large valves. Currently my 3.0 (83) has smaller valves.

Thanks

David

Valve sizes are all the same. The later SC ports are smaller, but easily enlarged. 3,2 heads have even larger ports, but they have different studs and the head volume is slightly larger, I have read.

Harpo 09-07-2019 12:58 PM

I thought the studs were changed with the 3.6L


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.