Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   Case prep cost consideration, early AL vs 7R (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/236705-case-prep-cost-consideration-early-al-vs-7r.html)

Shuie 08-18-2005 01:09 PM

Case prep cost consideration, early AL vs 7R
 
Engine would be a 2.5 or a 2.6.

Does it cost more to do 'all the mods' to an early aluminum case or a 7R case? I know the list is different for each; line & shuffle pin for the 7R vs oil by pass, piston squirters, spigots for the AL case.

Also, how much more does an AL case weigh than a 7R?

TIA

kenikh 08-18-2005 01:55 PM

I believe the weight difference is 22 lbs.

Eagledriver 08-18-2005 03:20 PM

You could price this out by talking to a machine shop such as German Precision (Ted Robinson). The advantage in my mind would go to the Aluminum case. The Mag case will crack, it's only a matter of time. For a street engine keeping the revs below 7000 RPM and not putting on alot of miles the Mag case would be ok, but the Al case will last longer in any application.

-Andy

rswannabe 08-18-2005 03:47 PM

I've been thinking about these same issues for my own 2.6 buildup. Here is where I am at so far.

Granted the Al case will definitely be stronger, BUT I think a mag case would be sufficient for a street engine. Look at all the high milage 2.7 and 2.8 RS MFI motors running around. Randy Wells has over 30,000 miles on his if I recall and its built on a 4R/5R case, not even a 7R. He drives it hard too. The 66mm crank of the short stroke motor also imposes less stress on the case. Of course if you are looking to rev it to 8,000 rpm, than you want to go with the Al.

blue72s 08-18-2005 05:07 PM

Quote:

The Mag case will crack, it's only a matter of time.
Crack? What crack? I think the main problem of mag is stud pulling, but if you use Dilavar, you should be ok. Just my .02

Shuie 08-18-2005 06:53 PM

Thanks for the help everyone. Ive seen the debates on the strength issue. That doesnt concern me. How about the cost of the prepwork?

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by blue72s
Crack? What crack? I think the main problem of mag is stud pulling, but if you use Dilavar, you should be ok. Just my .02
LOL,..Oh, they crack alright,.....right behind the #3 cylinder at the back of the case. Its an RPM issue and sometimes imperfect balance.

This is precisely why the factory went to Aluminum for the race engines in 1974.

blue72s 08-19-2005 09:18 AM

Quote:

they crack alright,.....right behind the #3 cylinder at the back of the case. Its an RPM issue
Even by short stroke crankshaft?
If so, what's the safe RPM limit?

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 09:59 AM

I've not seen the same degree of cracking issues with the 66mm cranks but there are far more factors at work here.

Bore size, compression ratio, and RPM all play roles in how much stress these mag cases undergo.

I would try to keep maximum RPM below 7400 to ensure longevity and I would NOT boattail a mag case. Removing metal in these things is the very LAST thing one wants to do,......:)

kenikh 08-19-2005 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve@Rennsport
I've not seen the same degree of cracking issues with the 66mm cranks but there are far more factors at work here.

Bore size, compression ratio, and RPM all play roles in how much stress these mag cases undergo.

I would try to keep maximum RPM below 7400 to ensure longevity and I would NOT boattail a mag case. Removing metal in these things is the very LAST thing one wants to do,......:)

Are you saying that a stock bore 2.0L mag cased car shouldn't worry too much about stress cracks, even if you whip it around in the 7500 - 8000RPM range?

blue72s 08-19-2005 11:52 AM

Quote:

Removing metal in these things is the very LAST thing one wants to do,......
When you say bore size, do you mean spigot size?
Is a 97mm (spigot) case more prone to cracking than a 92mm one?

jpnovak 08-19-2005 01:18 PM

Has anyone ever welded stiffening ribs to a Mg case?

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenikh
Are you saying that a stock bore 2.0L mag cased car shouldn't worry too much about stress cracks, even if you whip it around in the 7500 - 8000RPM range?
I am saying that a mag-cased 2.0 would have other issues to worry about (oiling) at 8000 RPM besides case cracking. :)

I would not lose sleep about a possibility of case cracking with such an engine and the same would apply to a 2.2.

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by blue72s
When you say bore size, do you mean spigot size?
Is a 97mm (spigot) case more prone to cracking than a 92mm one?

My referral to bore size was basically a referral to spigot size, yes.

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jpnovak
Has anyone ever welded stiffening ribs to a Mg case?
Jamie:

Welding magnesium is NOT for the faint of heart,....:)

I've made small welds to mag cases in certain areas but I've not attempted to attach stiffening ribs.

Many years ago, I heard of someone who tried that with no long-term success. Due to the different alloys used in the mag case and the available materials, the case cracked all around the attached ribs.

Thats why the Factory (who patented magnesium pressure-casting in 1968) gave up and went back to aluminum.

Mag cases are fine if they have been properly prepared, but they simply have their limitations.

Shuie 08-19-2005 06:44 PM

Thanks again, guys.

Any thoughts on the relative cost of the prepwork of an early AL vs 7R case? 1.5x? 2x as much?

kenikh 08-19-2005 07:36 PM

Poor Shuie, he wants to know what it costs to buy a house not how to build it. :D

Steve@Rennsport 08-19-2005 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shuie
Thanks again, guys.

Any thoughts on the relative cost of the prepwork of an early AL vs 7R case? 1.5x? 2x as much?

Its about the same given all the things one needs to do.

Shuie 08-19-2005 07:50 PM

Thank you!

blue72s 08-20-2005 08:06 AM

Quote:

I would try to keep maximum RPM below 7400 to ensure longevity
The red line (I assume it means safe RPM limit) of a 1973 Carrera 2.7RS, which is long stroke, is 7300, so why the safe RPM limit for a short stroke 2.5/2.6 10.3:1 is only 100 RPM more?

Steve@Rennsport 08-20-2005 08:51 AM

Those are large bore engines which leave less material at the case spigots for stiffness and expecially important with the early (non 7R) cases.

Its really all about how long you expect the engine to last. :)

blue72s 08-20-2005 10:15 AM

So, if Al is the way to go, we might as well go to big displacement like 3.2 otherwise what's the point?

The principal of small displacement is lightweightness but if that isn't possible...

Shuie 08-20-2005 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by blue72s
So, if Al is the way to go, we might as well go to big displacement like 3.2 otherwise what's the point?

Something like this has been said many times here. It makes a ton of sense but, I dont think there is a single best answer to the 'which engine' question.

In my case, Im going for the lightest possible engine tranny setup I can think of. My plan is a mild 2.5 built on a mag 7R case hooked up to a mag type 911 gearbox. Im sacrificing strength and durability throughout my drivetrain for something really lightweight. Since I may only occasionally see 7000 RPM, I dont think I need an engine that is completely bulletproof in sustained high RPM conditions.

Steve@Rennsport 08-20-2005 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by blue72s
So, if Al is the way to go, we might as well go to big displacement like 3.2 otherwise what's the point?

The principal of small displacement is lightweightness but if that isn't possible...

I think people need to maintain perspective & context in cases like this and refrain from making hasty conclusions,....... :) :) :)

Mag-cased engines, if properly configured and constructed, can be VERY durable as long as one is realistic about what it costs to do one correctly and maintains reasonable performance expectations.

For example, I've done a LOT of 2.8's over the past 30+ years and these are not only bloody fast machines, but very reliable with good oil temperature control.

I can tell you that a 2.8 with good close-ratio gears in a light (sub 2400 lb) car, makes a potent combination that rivals a larger engine in a heavier one and is a lot more entertaining to drive.

That said, its all in what we all like and economic realities.

Steve@Rennsport 08-20-2005 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shuie
I dont think there is a single best answer to the 'which engine' question.
I think those are "Pearls of Wisdom",....:)

blue72s 09-03-2005 08:06 AM

An advantage for opting an early alu case over the 3.0 alu case, I've just remembered, is that the head valves are smaller (46/40 as opposed to 49/41.5) thus less prone to valve floating at high revs. Right?

blue72s 09-03-2005 02:41 PM

Of the early alu case, is it possible to enlarge the spigots to 97mm? Would there be any seating surface left for the copper base gaskets to sit on?

Porsche Doc 09-04-2005 12:28 PM

Hey Shuie,
We use the AL cases for the race cars 2.5Ls and down.
Send your case to Ted at Greman Presion.
Also tell him to convert it to the later cam covers, IF your gona use Carrera tenisors. We use solid ones on the race engines.
Do the oil by pass, Carrera or turbo oil pump, pin mains, boat tail mains and oil squrters. Costs about $1200 or so.

Shuie 09-04-2005 12:31 PM

Thanks Don!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.