![]() |
Case prep cost consideration, early AL vs 7R
Engine would be a 2.5 or a 2.6.
Does it cost more to do 'all the mods' to an early aluminum case or a 7R case? I know the list is different for each; line & shuffle pin for the 7R vs oil by pass, piston squirters, spigots for the AL case. Also, how much more does an AL case weigh than a 7R? TIA |
I believe the weight difference is 22 lbs.
|
You could price this out by talking to a machine shop such as German Precision (Ted Robinson). The advantage in my mind would go to the Aluminum case. The Mag case will crack, it's only a matter of time. For a street engine keeping the revs below 7000 RPM and not putting on alot of miles the Mag case would be ok, but the Al case will last longer in any application.
-Andy |
I've been thinking about these same issues for my own 2.6 buildup. Here is where I am at so far.
Granted the Al case will definitely be stronger, BUT I think a mag case would be sufficient for a street engine. Look at all the high milage 2.7 and 2.8 RS MFI motors running around. Randy Wells has over 30,000 miles on his if I recall and its built on a 4R/5R case, not even a 7R. He drives it hard too. The 66mm crank of the short stroke motor also imposes less stress on the case. Of course if you are looking to rev it to 8,000 rpm, than you want to go with the Al. |
Quote:
|
Thanks for the help everyone. Ive seen the debates on the strength issue. That doesnt concern me. How about the cost of the prepwork?
|
Quote:
This is precisely why the factory went to Aluminum for the race engines in 1974. |
Quote:
If so, what's the safe RPM limit? |
I've not seen the same degree of cracking issues with the 66mm cranks but there are far more factors at work here.
Bore size, compression ratio, and RPM all play roles in how much stress these mag cases undergo. I would try to keep maximum RPM below 7400 to ensure longevity and I would NOT boattail a mag case. Removing metal in these things is the very LAST thing one wants to do,......:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is a 97mm (spigot) case more prone to cracking than a 92mm one? |
Has anyone ever welded stiffening ribs to a Mg case?
|
Quote:
I would not lose sleep about a possibility of case cracking with such an engine and the same would apply to a 2.2. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Welding magnesium is NOT for the faint of heart,....:) I've made small welds to mag cases in certain areas but I've not attempted to attach stiffening ribs. Many years ago, I heard of someone who tried that with no long-term success. Due to the different alloys used in the mag case and the available materials, the case cracked all around the attached ribs. Thats why the Factory (who patented magnesium pressure-casting in 1968) gave up and went back to aluminum. Mag cases are fine if they have been properly prepared, but they simply have their limitations. |
Thanks again, guys.
Any thoughts on the relative cost of the prepwork of an early AL vs 7R case? 1.5x? 2x as much? |
Poor Shuie, he wants to know what it costs to buy a house not how to build it. :D
|
Quote:
|
Thank you!
|
Quote:
|
Those are large bore engines which leave less material at the case spigots for stiffness and expecially important with the early (non 7R) cases.
Its really all about how long you expect the engine to last. :) |
So, if Al is the way to go, we might as well go to big displacement like 3.2 otherwise what's the point?
The principal of small displacement is lightweightness but if that isn't possible... |
Quote:
In my case, Im going for the lightest possible engine tranny setup I can think of. My plan is a mild 2.5 built on a mag 7R case hooked up to a mag type 911 gearbox. Im sacrificing strength and durability throughout my drivetrain for something really lightweight. Since I may only occasionally see 7000 RPM, I dont think I need an engine that is completely bulletproof in sustained high RPM conditions. |
Quote:
Mag-cased engines, if properly configured and constructed, can be VERY durable as long as one is realistic about what it costs to do one correctly and maintains reasonable performance expectations. For example, I've done a LOT of 2.8's over the past 30+ years and these are not only bloody fast machines, but very reliable with good oil temperature control. I can tell you that a 2.8 with good close-ratio gears in a light (sub 2400 lb) car, makes a potent combination that rivals a larger engine in a heavier one and is a lot more entertaining to drive. That said, its all in what we all like and economic realities. |
Quote:
|
An advantage for opting an early alu case over the 3.0 alu case, I've just remembered, is that the head valves are smaller (46/40 as opposed to 49/41.5) thus less prone to valve floating at high revs. Right?
|
Of the early alu case, is it possible to enlarge the spigots to 97mm? Would there be any seating surface left for the copper base gaskets to sit on?
|
Hey Shuie,
We use the AL cases for the race cars 2.5Ls and down. Send your case to Ted at Greman Presion. Also tell him to convert it to the later cam covers, IF your gona use Carrera tenisors. We use solid ones on the race engines. Do the oil by pass, Carrera or turbo oil pump, pin mains, boat tail mains and oil squrters. Costs about $1200 or so. |
Thanks Don!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website