![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rotterdam, NL
Posts: 2
|
advice sought on 1978 SC engine upgrade options
This forum is really great! I have read it for some time and it helped me enormously to understand the 911.
I have recently acquired a 1978 euro SC 3.0 and want to make it my cool daily driver for next year. The engine needs a rebuild and I would very much appreciate your input on the best engine upgrade options for this. I have done as much homework as I can in order to waste as little of your time as possible, but I'm left with various scenarios. For its intended use as a great daily driver it seems like a good idea to retain the CIS, heater blower and A/C. The car will run on good quality euro 95 RON fuel. Furthermore, some upgrades seem obvious: heads port matched to inlet and exhaust manifolds SSI heat exchangers with 2 in 1 OEM muffler Mallory coil, cd and Magnecor leads 964 cam profile Carrera tensioners ARP hardware higher-spec valvetrain Now I have worked it down to the following possibilities: 1. LN Engineering refurbishing of original cylinders 95mm with new Nikasil plating, JE pistons CIS dome, CR 9.5:1 2. Cylinder upgrade, Nickies 95mm, JE pistons CIS dome, CR 9.5:1 3. Big bore to 3.2 with Nickies 98mm, JE pistons CIS dome, CR 9.5:1, heads camfered 4. Twin plug 3.2 with Nickies 98mm, JE pistons wedge dome, CR 10.5:1, heads camfered + machined for second plug, distributor converted to twinplug I would love to have some advice on which option would give the most driveable, (fuel)efficient, cool running, enjoyable, powerful and sweet engine? Now of course there is a price difference between these four options. Which option would be the best investment? Thanks! PS: undoubtedly I failed to see other possibilities, such as going for Carrera 3.2 heads or backdate the heating etc., switch to EFI etc, please feel free to bring these to attention too. Thanks very much! Last edited by daddycool; 04-22-2006 at 03:08 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 181
|
I wouldn't look at these options as investments. The real question is how much do you want to spend?
Once you do the SSI's and set of 964 cams (or web cam 20-21, which is even a little more aggressive), the performance improvements start to get subtle unless you ditch the CIS. Since you're starting from a '78 euro, you're starting from a good base (big port heads, decent fuel distributor, etc.). The big choice for you is the P/C - do you want to spend the extra $$$ and go for the 98mm, which will give you another 7% or so horsepower. This would be a lot more costly for you than reusing your cylinders (assuming they're Nikasil) with 9.5 JE pistons. If you have Alusil and need to replace cylinders anyway, 98's are a no-brainer. Good luck - let us know how it goes!
__________________
1978 911sc Targa (Sold ![]() 2005 BMW X5 3.0i 2000 BMW 528iT (5 spd, sport) 2000 BMW 323Ci conv. (4 sale) 1987 Corvette Callaway Twin-Turbo Conv |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oahu
Posts: 2,303
|
Just curious. If he had decided to ditch the CIS, and go with natural aspiration, how would it have effected your comments on cam selection? Keeping in mind, "reliable daily driver". Thanks!
__________________
Jon |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rotterdam, NL
Posts: 2
|
Thanks for your replies!
Perhaps a little more explanation is in order. At first I wanted to buy a new mid-size car but decided life's too short to drive in boring cars... So I decided to buy and rebuild the 911 SC instead. I like the in-between look of the SC with the impact bumpers but still chrome and the ATS wheels. So I have a good budget, it's just that I'm not sure how much I need to spend on the engine rebuild to get to the desired result, hence my post. It's easy to spend as much as possible but I just want a great daily driver. And I'm a perfectionist so I want to be sure I picked the right configuartion, with your help... The rest of the car will be great, brakes and suspension upped to Carrera 3.2 spec, rebuild 915 transaxle, nice new interior etc. So, do I need twin plugging? Do I need the larger displacement? The car will be driven both in slow commuting traffic as on fast weekend trips to more desirable locations. Again thanks for your input! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 181
|
Jon, regarding the cams. I'm certainly no expert in that area; so, take what I say with a grain of salt. If you're ditching CIS in favor of carbs, you can run much hotter cams. However, hotter cams bring more power up high in the RPM range, but you'll suffer down low, which is where you want your power in a daily driver. Unless you're going for all-out, no-compromise horsepower, CIS is just fine.
In doing mine, I've opted to keep the CIS and have a set of 20-21 cams ready to go in. It's not a daily driver, but I didn't want to lose the flexibility that comes with the SC motor. daddycool, if you haven't already done so, I'd go drive an '84 to '86 carrera and see how you like the speed. An SC with minor mods (SSI's and cam) will be as fast or a little faster than a stock carrera. If that's not enough for you, then you know you need to think about more displacement, carbs, etc.
__________________
1978 911sc Targa (Sold ![]() 2005 BMW X5 3.0i 2000 BMW 528iT (5 spd, sport) 2000 BMW 323Ci conv. (4 sale) 1987 Corvette Callaway Twin-Turbo Conv |
||
![]() |
|
up-fixing der car(ma)
|
Think EFI conversion + nice used (K27?) Turbo......
![]() BUT, if you really want to stay N/A and keep it simple: SSIs, 2 in 1 out muffler, 964 cams, standard valve springs (it sounds like it's not going to have the poop revved out of it every 10 seconds so I would try to minimize wear/pressure within the valve train by using stock springs) Good luck! Scott
__________________
Scott Kinder kindersport @ gmail.com Last edited by YTNUKLR; 04-24-2006 at 02:14 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: trumpistan
Posts: 9,885
|
How about the SSI's and 2 in 1 out muffler, 964 cams, along with the stock '80 up P/C's. That extra point in CR was good for 25 HP, wasn't it? Would that be worth the bucks?
__________________
Brandolini’s Law: It takes hours more time, research, and writing to debunk misinformation than it takes to spread it. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 640
|
If you were to spend on the 80-83 P&Cs, might as well go to 98mm.
__________________
-Brian |
||
![]() |
|
user & abuser
|
hey!
4 years ago i was in a simlar state..well kinda...anyways... i had a mag 2.7L, i added a set of JE P&C's to take it up to 3L, with a CR of 9.81:1. I was told this is as high as u can go without twin plugging. if u go more displacment, or higher CR, twin plugging is nessecary. the car also ran with SSI's and a magnaflow two in 1 out muffle, and my fuel distributer was upgarded (flowed?) up to euro specs (yours)..... i also upped the valve springs and had a custom grind cam.. (longer lift S), believe they were called evo 2 S's...w/e....anyways...it makes really good power...though kidna high up...and it is very very loud. now....on the other hand...there is no replacement for displacement, ( forced induction has reliablity problems) and upping to 98mm P&C's will have a nice effect, and removed the chance of poor re-finished of your current nikkies. anyways...make sure to post a bunch of pictures. that what we like
__________________
vini vidi vici |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: trumpistan
Posts: 9,885
|
Quote:
__________________
Brandolini’s Law: It takes hours more time, research, and writing to debunk misinformation than it takes to spread it. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 640
|
3.2 P&C can be run with stock CIS no problem. Some machining is necessary if you use stock. If you use Henry's QSC/JE setup, for example, they will bolt right on without chamfering the heads.
__________________
-Brian |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: trumpistan
Posts: 9,885
|
Thanks, Brian!
__________________
Brandolini’s Law: It takes hours more time, research, and writing to debunk misinformation than it takes to spread it. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
Really interested since I have a 79 Euro 3.0 and like daddycool am also considering upgrading to later (e.g., 95mm or 3.2/ 98mm) pistons, while retaining stock CIS (ala Euro fuel dizzy, larger airbox, etc.). Would I have to obtain new cylinders, rings, etc., with this setup? BTW, I already have John Dougherty''s 964 Cams, 1.75" headers, and Ben's (mb911) 2 in 2 out SS 911R style muffler.
__________________
73 Porsche 911 2.8 RSR Tribute Viper Green 84 Porsche 928 S Project car 84 Porsche 930 / 73 2.8 RSR backdate project car 06 Porsche Cayman S 09 Porsche Cayenne Turbo S - |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 181
|
Just search for "supertec qsc" and you'll find info on pics on his setup. Henry offers an aftermarket piston, cylinder, ring setup in multiple displacements and compression ratios - pretty much anything you could want to tailor to your needs.
__________________
1978 911sc Targa (Sold ![]() 2005 BMW X5 3.0i 2000 BMW 528iT (5 spd, sport) 2000 BMW 323Ci conv. (4 sale) 1987 Corvette Callaway Twin-Turbo Conv |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 11
|
Can someone tell me what difference there will be between a 2 IN,1 OUT and a 2 IN,2 OUT exhaust system?Need to replace the muffler and got some performance headers I want to install on a 79Sc.
|
||
![]() |
|