Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   2.0 head comparison (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/281228-2-0-head-comparison.html)

shbop 05-05-2006 09:46 PM

2.0 head comparison
 
Can anyone tell me about the 69' 2.0 T heads. Specifically if the combustion area is the same as 66' 2.0. I've recently acquired a set of 69's and I'm considering whether or not to put them on my 66' 2.0 re-build. I'm using 81mm JE's @ 9.5:1. Weber's for induction. I realize I'm not building a rocket-ship here, but the larger valve heads have me thinking. Thanks in advance for any help!

jluetjen 05-06-2006 04:03 AM

I believe (working from memory) that the '69T heads will have bigger valves then the 66 heads. These will provide a performance improvement. As far as the dome shape, I believe that it's pretty much the same.

shbop 05-06-2006 06:44 AM

John, Thanks for the reply. Do you think it's worth the effort? The ports are the same size on both:32 But the 69' has larger valves: 42/38 vs. 39/35

Henry Schmidt 05-06-2006 01:06 PM

BIGGER VALVE ARE WORTH THE EFFORT.

Go ahead and port the heads a little (35 or so) , even if they end up larger than the intake manifold.

If you still have the original 66 911 (Solex) cams they love to breath.

shbop 05-06-2006 04:03 PM

That's what I was hoping to hear. Thanks Henry!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.