![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 283
|
Powergain for 911T 2.0 with 'S' pistons 'S' cams 46mm carbs and twin ignition
Hi guys,
How much power could you expect from stock 911T 2.0 with the following mods: 911T crank 911S Pistons 911S Cams 46mm carbs Twin ignition Dual pipe exhaust Engine has chain tensioners upgrade, upgraded fuel pump etc. Cheers, n. Last edited by TargaFlorio; 07-21-2006 at 01:32 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
For this example, I'm assuming 2.0T heads since you didn't mention them.
So the operative factors are: - 2.0S Pistons and Cam mean that basically the best that you can hope for is 2.0S performance. - 2.0T heads have smaller ports then 2.0S heads (and in some cases smaller valves too). The end result is that this combination won't have quite as much at the top end (say 6500 RPM - 7500 RPM) as a 2.0S, but will be comparable to a little bit stronger from 4000 RPM up through 6500 RPM. THis is because the ports won't be able to flow the required amount of mixture at peak RPM. But it's not all bad since the smaller ports will improve the performance at low to mid-rev's. Porsche used engines similar to this in the late 60's as rally spec motors. As far as the other stuff... - 46 mm carbs: Overkill and way too much flow for what the ports can support. You'd do a lot better with 40 mm carbs. Even if this were a vintage race motor, the 46's would most likely be too big. - Twin ignition: This will help the part throttle and low rev running quite a bit. Since the peak HP is constrainted more by airflow rather then by ignition, I doubt that it will do much for you there. - Dual Pipe Exhaust: Noticeably more noice, but I doubt that you'll find much HP there. That's my $0.02. If Henry Schmidt or Steve Weiner disagree with me -- my money is on them! PS: Welcome Aboard! ![]()
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 283
|
Cheers John.
I forgot the mention the valves, the heads would carry the bigger 'S' valves. And yes, the exhaust is for the aural delight. Cheers, n. |
||
![]() |
|
3 restos WIP = psycho
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Exit 17
Posts: 7,665
|
So this just sounds like an S replica motor with twin plugs. Probably 175HP, but the 46mm carbs would nuke your drivability. 40mm would be much more appropriate. You might be able to get a little more power with headers, too.
__________________
- 1965 911 - 1969 911S - 1980 911SC Targa - 1979 930 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 283
|
Ok, that makes sense.
Thanks for all your answers. Cheers, n. |
||
![]() |
|