Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 71
2.2 L to 2.54 L Engine Conversion

I have a 70 911 E which is about to be converted into a larger engine size. I have a std/std 70.4 crank w/rods, cams reground to 1966 Solex specs, a stock refurbished mfi system, access to good cast iron cylinders which are intended to be fitted with J&E 87.5mm pistons with a 9.5:1 compression ratio, and stock 2.2 heads with 32mm ports. There is also an experienced engine builder and machine shop doing the work with over 30 years of Porsche building experience, largely in the racing circuit. We agree that the cast iron cylinders are quite stable given that the cylinders and fins are cast as one piece. At possible issue is the cylinder wall thickness (.0042 In.) especially at the spigot where the piston makes the turn on its wrist pin, the concern being that the small amount of piston rattle in this area might eventually lead to a fissure over the course of normally driven mileage. Does anyone have a comment or experience with this conversion other than using the very expensive L&N 87.5mm cylinders? There was a 2.5 L racing class of cars in the 1970's using cast iron cylinders with 86.8mm bores, but they may have had larger cylinders requiring spigot enlargements (not sure), however I would be interested in acquring these cylinders if they were larger. All comments would be appreciated.

Walt

Old 08-03-2011, 04:52 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
304065's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,569
Walt, no doubt you recognize my user name so I will get you started and then the real experts will chime in. First of all WELCOME to our forum, great to have you here.

Conventional wisdom is that a 1mm overbore is the max for both the Birals and Cast-Iron. The longer stroke (70.4) will have greater rod angularity. The JE will have zero offset to the piston pin. Factory pistons have a small offset, see here Piston pin offset

What is the concern here about using Nikasil 89s like the ST? Boring the spigots for a true 2,7? The price of the JE pistons is the same, I assume you have external oil cooling?

2,5 was achieved back in the day a couple ways- short stroke or long stroke
short stroke 89x66, 2464cc, with 38cc dome gets you 12,3 to 1 at 1.0mm deck
long stroke 86.8x70.4, 2500cc, 38cc dome gets you 12,6
__________________
'66 911 #304065 Irischgruen
‘96 993 Carrera 2 Polarsilber
'81 R65
Ex-'71 911 PCA C-Stock Club Racer #806 (Sold 5/15/13)
Ex-'88 Carrera (Sold 3/29/02)
Ex-'91 Carrera 2 Cabriolet (Sold 8/20/04)
Ex-'89 944 Turbo S (Sold 8/21/20)

Last edited by 304065; 08-04-2011 at 03:32 AM..
Old 08-03-2011, 05:03 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
3 restos WIP = psycho
 
kenikh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Exit 17
Posts: 7,665
Nickies can support 87.5mm. Birals cannot. The grain structure of the alloy in the machined Nickies is tough as bails.

__________________

- 1965 911
- 1969 911S
- 1980 911SC Targa
- 1979 930
Old 08-06-2011, 11:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.