![]() |
Fully threaded head studs - what are they?
In the process of tearing my engine down. I have the heads off, but not the cylinders yet. Best I can tell, the whole stud is threaded? I wasn't expecting that. Any idea what iteration of head studs I might have? I'm pretty sure they were replaced at some point in the engine's life.
Todd |
I believe that would be 993 Dilivar. Which is a good thing.
|
yup, off the 993 models.
|
So, definitely reusable? I was hoping to have the case tumbled to clean it up. Maybe just hot tank it then?
Todd |
Actually 993 twin turbo. Regular 993 are all 24 steel studs.
Steve Weiner is a big proponent of these 993TT studs for performance usage. They're the latest and greatest iteration of Diilvar studs and that's supposed to be a good thing. |
These are the good ones, used on 993RS and 993tt
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1362088663.jpg |
Looking through some paperwork that came with the car. Looks like these used to be part number 93010117002. Superseded with part number in the pic above.
Todd |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i1087.photobucket.com/albums/...Bcasestuds.jpg |
Still good, or recommendation would be to replace them?
Todd |
Quote:
I put the .52's in my rebuild (2002) before the prices went through the roof. No problems with them ever. |
Actually the Dilivar stud that is 930.101.170.02 was the smooth style only threaded at the ends. The 911 turbo engines have always had all 24 studs in dilivar flavor. That 930 part number is currently superseded by the 993 all-thread ending in .53
The all-thread appears to have arrived with the 965 3.6 turbo engine around 1993-1994. They used 12 of the regular 930 dilivars and 12 of the all thread (ending in .51). A noteworthy aside here is that the 964 engines (even the 965 3.3 turbo) used 930 dilivar studs for all 24 studs. Then the 993 comes along and the regular 993 gets steel studs p/n 993.101.171.02 (now superseded to .03 which is also steel). I have these 993 steel studs on my "race" engine, which I bought from Pelican last year. Then the 993RS and 993TT come along and they get all-thread dilivars for all 24 studs. Weird how the dilivar usage hops around on these engines, isn't it? We might be interested to know what the 996TT uses, since that engine is based on an air cooled case. It uses 24 studs that are p/n 996.101.172.70, which coincidentally are the same studs the GT3 uses. They're fairly cheap @ only $17 each. So they must be steel? I suspect the water cooling negated the need to install the dilivar studs. |
Damn - cheapest I can find them is $38/ea. $900 for 24...doh! Pelican Stock
|
Makes the Supertec studs a bonafide bargain, doesn't it? :D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Todd |
The subject of head studs has been debated in this forum for many years and prices just seem to keep on increasing.
Standard steel studs are around $400 a set with nuts and washers. Good Quality aftermarket studs seem to average at around $650 a set The latest 993 Dilavar parts are $1500 without nuts and washers. All of this for a stud with a torque of 24-25 lbsft. Grade 8.8 bolts can be safely torqued to 34 lbsft so I wonder why we need to use ultra-high strength super alloys that were developed for the hot sections of Gas Turbines when simple bolts will probably do the job. 4 feet of a Grade 8.8 All thread has a cost of about $4 and would make 6 studs so 24 studs would be less that $20. Seems quite good value. Grade 10.9 all thread is about twice the price an even so cost would be less than $50 per engine. Seems like quite a good saving :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dilavar expands around 50% more than ferritic/martensitic steels and and they don't lose preload - at least until they break. The description used by our Host for 993 studs is as follows: 993 - fully threaded, DILAVAR, 911/911 Turbo (1965-98) I was trying to have a discussion on why we all believe the more exotic the material the 'better' the stud when in fact the application is not particularly demanding in terms of metallurgy. My old 500cc (Single) Velocette Venom Thruxton used to produce around 45 BHP which is equivalent to 270BHP from a 3.0 litre and it had 4 really cheap studs that were nothing special. Manx Nortoms produced around 55BHP in 1963 (330 BHP equivalent) and again used 4 x simple studs. Today with all of the modern advances we seem to need $1000 of high end Precipitation Hardening Superalloys to do the same job that was done in the Sixties with materials that were not much better than mild steel. I guess this is what we call progress. :D |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website