|  | 
| 
 Re-Torquing Heads after Rebuild I know I'm asking permission here for a shortcut, which is not recommended, but I'll make my question either way to gauge the response on seriousness of my actions... :)  Last week I opened up the valve covers to do a valve adjust. There was a top end done about 10k miles ago, and this was overdue as a second valve adjust (did one at ~1k, but got clicky again soon thereafter). There was a bit of an oil leak from the 1-3 cyl bank, and so I decided to check the head stud torque specs... sure enough the nuts/studs were about 5-10lbs shy of 23.5lbs specification. The 4-6 bank were all in spec. Now, for the shortcut...I didn't remove the rockers to get to studs/nuts #1-8 in the head diagram for torquing order (as specified in Bruce Anderson's rebuild book), but went ahead with retorquing studs #9-18 in order and pattern recommended. This means that the outside nuts/studs are in spec but the inside 8 could be undertorqued...but the perimeter nuts/studs are tight. Will this be problematic? Any experience on this approach? | 
| 
 Are you torquing the head nuts (10mm) Allen or the cam carrier 8 mm nuts? Bruce | 
| 
 The head nuts (10mm) and Allen bolt heads - of which there are 18 total as specified in the cross torquing pattern for the heads. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Er, um.  Yes.  The cam carrier bolts...just went back and looked again at the diagram with caption, and I evidently misread what I was tightening...so I actually just retorqued the cam carrier bolts. :o   I must have gotten in a hurry and read right past it, not to mention not even taking notice of why the pattern of 'studs' was so haphazard and numerous... eek.  :eek: Good news is that they were loose and I retorqued them but about 1.5lbs shy of spec.  Also good news is that this is a first step before tightening the head studs.  Guess I will be trying again next time I have the covers off.... Question remains, if the cam carriers are not retorqued with the inner nuts but only those accessable with the rockers in place, am I looking at issues...i suppose less serious given these are not head studs :confused: | 
| 
 Well, the torque spec for those is 18 ft-lb so they were ok to start with and you over tightened the ones you could reach.  I'd just leave it alone at this point. | 
| 
 I actually might be inclined to fix it. ..you want the cam to run true in the center of that thing. I wouldn't want a mix match of torque throughout.  Could be over kill but the last top end I did we followed Waynes book using lock tite under the cylinders. The loctite set unevenly and the cam locker up tighter than a drum when we bolted the carrier down....so they are somewhat sensitive to variation. I'm not a pro builder like others on the board,  so it's good to solicit other opinions. | 
| 
 I actually might be inclined to fix it. ..you want the cam to run true in the center of that thing. I wouldn't want a mix match of torque throughout.  Could be over kill but the last top end I did we followed Waynes book using lock tite under the cylinders. The loctite set unevenly and the cam locked up tighter than a drum when we bolted the carrier down....so they are somewhat sensitive to variation. I'm not a pro builder like others on the board,  so it's good to solicit other opinions. | 
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 AM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
	
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
	Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website