Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   Pulled head studs on fresh 3.3 build (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/874604-pulled-head-studs-fresh-3-3-build.html)

gumba 07-13-2015 10:28 AM

Pulled head studs on fresh 3.3 build
 
Just finished a complete rebuild on a 3.3 turbo motor. Did the 20 minute break in @2,000 rpm with no issues, and let the motor cool over night. Drained the oil next day, adjusted the valves and re torqued the heads to 36 lbs. Two of the studs won't torque down, so I'm assuming they are starting to pull out of the case. The rest of the studs either held the original torque, or were within a couple of pounds. I used ARP head studs and installed with red locktite.

What are my repair options? I would like to either install, or have a machine shop install time certs or helicoils in all 12 stud holes. Hopefully (and this could be wishful thinking)this could be done to the short block without splitting the case.

The motor is a '79 3.3 stock bottom end, and stock 7:1 p&c's.

cabmandone 07-13-2015 10:47 AM

Most seem to favor case savers over timesert from the research I did. I installed a timesert in my engine by myself without splitting the case. I used timesert because they offered a kit with bit, tap and everything else necessary. I leveled the block on a drill press and then checked to make sure the bit was square to the block. It really wasn't that hard but I only had to do 1 and I was NERVOUS doing that one.

Btw, the thing that worried me most was I didn't remove the rods and that made plugging the holes a bit difficult. I pushed paper towels down into the bores then used Gorilla duct tape to seal the holes and around the rods that were up. I then used Gorilla duct tape to cover the rods that stuck above the bores. Since I did my own, I had my son there with a shop vac sucking up the shavings as I drilled the hole.

Henry Schmidt 07-13-2015 11:32 AM

CaseSaver for sure and I would rethink the 36 pound torque number.
They are steel studs and because of the difference in expansion rates the clamping force will increase with heat. 28 to 32 lb would be my recommendation. The issue with ARP bolts in the past is that they tend to loosen after heat cycles so there may be times when you will need to re-torque your head studs.

gumba 07-13-2015 11:37 AM

Thanks. Any particular brand or kit of case savers?

gumba 07-13-2015 12:07 PM

I was looking at this time-cert kit. Universal m10x1.25 head bolt kit #6250

Henry Schmidt 07-13-2015 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gumba (Post 8708729)
I was looking at this time-cert kit. Universal m10x1.25 head bolt kit #6250

First the head stud threads in the case are 10x1.50mm.

The Timesert is structurally weaker than the CaseSaver. Powdered metal / sintered metal casting vs. solid steel. The design of the CaseSaver uses courser threads which translates to better holding power in a soft metal like aluminum or magnesium.
As far as I know, no one is offering a kit. The CaseSaver below is 14x2.0mm od and 10x1.50mm id.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1436821329.jpg

gumba 07-13-2015 02:28 PM

Thanks for the clarification. So a m14 x 2.0 tap, 15/32" drill bit and some type of jig to locate the hole.

Henry Schmidt 07-13-2015 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gumba (Post 8708924)
Thanks for the clarification. So a m14 x 2.0 tap, 15/32" drill bit and some type of jig to locate the hole.

yes
We use a mill but in lieu of that at home, a jig will be important. Even a slight variance in drilling leave you with "porcupine stud syndrome" Studs going in every direction. This can make cylinder installation incredibly tedious if not impossible.

gumba 07-13-2015 04:14 PM

Can you tell me the center to center head stud spacing. I have a mill and can make a 2.250" thick jig.

chris_seven 07-16-2015 12:01 AM

It all sounds a bit too close for comfort.

All things being equal a change from 32 lbsft to 36 lbsft torque will only increase the static preload by around 12.5%.

This well within the expected scatter in the relationship between torque and static preload - typically 30% and should have been taken into account at the design stage.

The increase in force on the thread caused by expansion will add directly to the static preload and this will further reduce the percentage difference between the preload values due to the difference between the two torque values to less than 5%.

I would worry if small differences at this level are significant as if this were the case we should be seeing many more failures that seem to be reported.

I would certainly look for other causes as this doesn't seem to be an issue due to studs and the arithmetic says that there may be another issue which has caused an excessive static preload.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.