Pelican Parts Forums
Page 2 of 2 « Prev 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   2.2T upgrade (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/987030-2-2t-upgrade.html)

Rosco_NZ 04-02-2019 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by targa72e (Post 9921680)
you can run any 2.2 or 2.4 P&C combo as piston pin is in same location. The difference in stroke was accommodated in the rods. t,e,s, pistons differ in compression ration and clearance in valve pockets. S pistons are forged. 2.2 compression will be stock with 66mm crank. 2.4 with 66MM crank will be about a 1/2 point lower and 2.2 with 70.4mm crank will be about 1/2 point higher. Port size relates more with cam selection. If using E cams you don't need to do anything with ports (T and E were same). Will probably need to rework carbs for new configuration for best power.



john


My ‘72 TE had 29mm inlet ports vs 32 for E I think

Babuski76 04-03-2019 07:06 AM
Richey did you use the 10.5:1 pistons and a 0.5 mm shim to get down to 9.5:1? where you using the standart T head?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richey (Post 10405973)
From my experience the Wossner pistons were not actually 10.5 to 1 . I think I only needed to add .5 mm of cylinder base shimming to get a ratio of 9.5 to 1 . You must of course do the math . Wossner has the dome volume specs , my 84.5 mm piston was
29.4 cc .

Richey 04-03-2019 06:31 PM
I used the 10.5 to 1 pistons and added a .5mm shim . I had S heads but all heads have the same volume . I think the issue will be a ratio of 9.5 to 1 with T cams . The actual CR will be too high .

Babuski76 04-04-2019 01:28 AM
Thanks Richey.
for what I understand is that if I use the T heads, E cam, the Wössner 10.5:1 pistons a 0.5 shim
the 85mm S cylinders, E cam. the CR will be 9.5:1, which will make it posible to use single plug. Does it have some side effects to use the 0.5 shim?

Richey 04-04-2019 07:35 PM
Yes , this is want I did with no side affects . Every engine is a little different , so take measurements and do the calcs for your application .

Babuski76 04-05-2019 02:01 AM
Thank you very much. It seems to be the simpel solution and not having the pistons machined, to meet the 9.5:1 CR.
Does any have a guide to do the CR calculations?

911Tfan 04-11-2019 09:06 AM
Do any of you guys know a good zenith rebuilder?

Rosco_NZ 04-13-2019 01:21 AM
He’s using a 66mm crank with 10.5:1 pistons so final CR will be around 10:1 .. add spigot land spacers as required to bring down further. High compression 2.5E should be a sweet engine!

Babuski76 04-14-2019 11:35 AM
Rosco. Do you mean that with the 0.5 shim the 66 crank and the 10.5:1 I will end up with around 10.1:1? And dont know the spigot land spacers, can you elaborate a bit?
Thanks Rasmus QUOTE=Rosco_NZ;10425453]He’s using a 66mm crank with 10.5:1 pistons so final CR will be around 10:1 .. add spigot land spacers as required to bring down further. High compression 2.5E should be a sweet engine![/QUOTE]


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 PM.
Page 2 of 2 « Prev 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.