Bob Hancock |
01-16-2005 01:06 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by jclark
>Nice bike but......I just don't get it.
I havta agree - rode one ( well, a 2003 Adventure ) and found it to be tippy, loosey goosey feeling, and very disconnected from the motor - no confidence here. It had knobbies and spoke wheels.
That being said, the guy who owns it, also owns my ass when we ride on tight technical roads - I need a larger wider two lane to pass...
I rather have my S.
jeff
...well, it *looks* cooler...
|
Jeff....while I have never ridden a 2003 adventure with knobbies, I really understand your perception as far as how differently these two bikes handle. When I brought home the GS I was amazed at how easy it is to turn it.....just takes a bit. You can actually "throw it around" quite easily. Well, I rode it for about 1400 miles, leaving the S in the garage. Yesterday I checked the S over....air pressure...stuff like that and took it out for a 150 mile ride. I didn't get out of my neighborhood before I stopped, got off, and checked to see if the front was flat! I was thinking....this thing steers like a truck...something's wrong (and this after about 35,000 miles on two S's.) Well....nothing was wrong, I rode for 3 hours and thoroughly enjoyed the S. Point is....these are really two different kinds of bikes. I think I'll ride the S for a week or so...let my muscle memory forget how the GS feels and see if it's alarming.
One more note....the S in a turn requires you to "keep it turning"....keep pressure on the bars. The GS doesn't. Put it in the turn....relax...have a ham sandwich....straighten it up when you're thru. I do like this feature better.
THe S on the other hand is dead nuts happy and stable at 100-120, while the GS seems to get a little light in the front. 80-90 are all day happy on the GS although it has the power needed for more, but the S will run faster and not get nervous.
Blah blah blah....fwiw.
|