![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
I was wondering if any of you has switched to /65 and what was the result.
I did it on other bikes and I always found improvements; mainly quicker response. Cool |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Belleville, ONtario, Canada
Posts: 1,146
|
I haven't tried a lower aspect tire, but it makes sense that lowering the front makes for a faster steering bike because you've effectively steepened the head angle, also less sidewall means less flex in transverse loading.
Same effect without reducing ground clearance is acheived by raising the rear via a shorter paralever link.
__________________
Rapt Black '99 R1100S Mojave Beige '02 VW Golf TDI |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 928
|
Going to a shorter tire will do three things that raising the rear won't do.
1. It will reduce the weight at the outside of the gyroscope that is the front wheel/tire assembly. This will quicken the steering and be more noticeable the higher the speed. 2. Lower profile front tires are usually slightly narrower than the higher profile front tire of the same width. This will change the steering characteristic when leaned over since the contact patch is closer to the centerline of the tire, this is generally better for neutral steering. 3. The slightly smaller outside diameter of the tire means that the brakes will have slightly more leverage (same brake rotor diameter, smaller tire diameter=more braking power). I have run 120/70 and 120/60 and prefer the feel of the 120/60 in every condition I have ridden in. Eron |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Riverside, CA, USA
Posts: 164
|
One more advantage will be the greater ease of bending the wheel! Isn't that great?! Then you can buy some great aftermarket wheels. You have to bend the old ones to get the new ones if you are married.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 928
|
Quote:
Eron |
||
![]() |
|
No Info on (t)his member
|
Well I bent both front and rear using 70's...
I will go for 60's on track-only wheels in future. jeff $1300ish later... |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't doubt what you are saying, but if a 120/60 is so much better, why do BMW fit a 120/70?
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Riverside, CA, USA
Posts: 164
|
I think because BMW got rid of Jaq. Nassar before he did something like that. He went to Ford and did wonderful things there for the tire dept.
These wheels are way to soft for 60's for street use. This is coming from someone who has made two sets of the BMW round wheels into BMW square wheels. By the way the round ones rolls much nicer and vibrate alot less, I don't know why but thats just the way it is. |
||
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have to say I have always prefered round wheels. So are you saying that you wouldn't recommend a swap to 120/60 for street use.
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Belleville, ONtario, Canada
Posts: 1,146
|
I like my wheels round too, but so far I haven't had any problems with "bending" them. However in light of the problems others have had I'd be very wary of making any significant departures from the factory spec to sidewall height or tire pressures.
__________________
Rapt Black '99 R1100S Mojave Beige '02 VW Golf TDI |
||
![]() |
|