![]() |
I have a question for you surveyors. Are property line distances measured as the crow flies? ie, in a straight line regardless of terrain elevation changes?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
In survey you just use miles, feet, tenths and hundredths of a foot so it's pretty easy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Poor CAD discipline has ruined the industry. CAD makes it very easy to do a bad job. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Quote:
Seems Frank felt you should learn proper drafting and design on a board before getting on a computer. I came from a traditional drafting background learned on a table using lead and ink. It is hard to teach that on a screen. My argument that cadd is better is the fact that if you let it do its job, it will make your easier and there will be no mistakes. What his BIL was doing was idiodic, he was making errors where there should be none. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
Back in my yoot I was working on a new construction job installing a steam turbine and generator and was using a transit to shoot in the elevation of the sole plates to within a few thousandths of an inch.
The pipe fitter foreman asked if I could shoot the elevations of some piping supports, I looked at the print and said to what tolerance? He said huh? I said how precise do you need it? He said oh we need em dead nuts, within 1/4" |
Quote:
Wright died 10 - 15 years BEFORE architectural CAD existed. There was NO CAD when he was alive. |
Quote:
I never stopped to think about when he died or if there was cadd then, it made sense to me, it reminded me of how Adriane Newey designs his cars on paper before committing them to cadd. Maybe it was more of the philosophy of the school rather than Franks wishes. I did find it interesting and agreed nonetheless. |
Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959)
|
Quote:
Maybe that was the gist of what I remember from the tour, sorry, I am not Kachi, I just ramble some **** out sometimes and carry on the conversation without doing 10 hours of internet research prior to my comments. |
I see dimensions like that all the time building houses. Nothing is that accurate when framing.
I didn’t read all the posts, but why are survey dimensions is feet and 10ths of a foot? Is it just easier than fractions? I can see that. Quote:
|
I can tell you that our civil engineer's surveys are accurate to a tenth of a foot. I've been building stuff with him since 1992, and we have built projects that cover a few thousand linear feet.
Civil engineering surveys are always in decimals out to .01 foot. But if you think that is confusing, try reading a topo map or a grading plan, haha! |
Quote:
|
Here is a shot in Alaska, when the helicopter flew in here we scared off a bear, it left a a pile for me there. I don't remember how high this was but it seems like a couple thousand feet up. I turned angles and measured distances sometime over four miles. One of the points was four thousand feet up with just enough room for the helicopter to hover a bit and let me unload the gear. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764335.jpg
|
Quote:
In reality, his stuff is crazy accurate. All of the subs say his stuff fits better than most, which is nice when you're working with multiple easements. That's when it gets scary, or with multiple utilities. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764158.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764132.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764190.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764593.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764614.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1551764624.jpg |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website