Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Which would you rather have? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1037829-would-you-rather-have.html)

Shaun @ Tru6 08-19-2019 04:51 PM

Which would you rather have?
 
2000 Boxster S or a 2002 996 C4S?

pwd72s 08-19-2019 05:05 PM

None of the above.

Macroni 08-19-2019 05:08 PM

996 for the additional space minimally

Dan J 08-19-2019 05:08 PM

Boxster all day long and twice on Sunday Not even close
How you doing Shaun?

Por_sha911 08-19-2019 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pwd72s (Post 10564013)
None of the above.

or more choices

Shaun @ Tru6 08-19-2019 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan J (Post 10564015)
Boxster all day long and twice on Sunday Not even close
How you doing Shaun?

Hey Dan, doing great! Have a new, awesome assistant that will change everything. I'll send you a note tomorrow.

onewhippedpuppy 08-19-2019 06:36 PM

I voted 986S but both are excellent. I tend to see the C4S as a poser 996TT without the power but I’m sure they are fun cars and look great. I just like the tossable Boxster.

masraum 08-19-2019 07:11 PM

When I bought my car, I drove several boxsters and caymans and even a 2001 996tt. I was surprised that the 2001 996tt felt boring. And it didn't feel that fast either. I'm sure it's faster than my 2008 Boxster S, but my car is a lot more fun and engaging to drive.

Tobra 08-19-2019 07:34 PM

Boxster S


You can buy a sedan or a wagon if you need space

Bill Douglas 08-19-2019 07:44 PM

A Boxster S because it's not a 996.

cantdrv55 08-19-2019 10:20 PM

The 2000 S but I have one so I’m biased. I’ve never driven a C4S but they’re good looking. Are they even in the same price range?

scottmandue 08-19-2019 10:27 PM

I voted 996 because rag tops are overrated :p

tabs 08-19-2019 11:29 PM

Is this Thread a Social experiment or something?

A930Rocket 08-20-2019 12:07 AM

On looks alone, I have to go with the 996 C4S.

Of course, I’ve never sat in or driven one either.

sc_rufctr 08-20-2019 12:35 AM

996 all the way. It's the most under valued 911 to date!
Boxters are cheaper and they also feel cheaper IMO.

Have you driven a good 996? They are a brilliant drive... It's an old car now but they certainly don't feel old.

fastfredracing 08-20-2019 03:33 AM

996

GH85Carrera 08-20-2019 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sc_rufctr (Post 10564308)
996 all the way. It's the most under valued 911 to date!
Boxters are cheaper and they also feel cheaper IMO.

Have you driven a good 996? They are a brilliant drive... It's an old car now but they certainly don't feel old.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fastfredracing (Post 10564344)
996

996 for me. I drove a 914 for 26 years. I have had all the convertible time I want for a lifetime. I want a coupe. And I would skip the weight of the 4 wheel drive system, and go with a 2 wheel drive model.

So bottom line neither, a slightly different coupe.

Nickshu 08-20-2019 05:26 AM

https://youtu.be/j4wCYLTy-6w

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j4wCYLTy-6w" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

masraum 08-20-2019 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 10564402)
996 for me. I drove a 914 for 26 years. I have had all the convertible time I want for a lifetime. I want a coupe. And I would skip the weight of the 4 wheel drive system, and go with a 2 wheel drive model.

So bottom line neither, a slightly different coupe.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1566308056.jpg

Nevergrowup 08-20-2019 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sc_rufctr (Post 10564308)
996 all the way. It's the most under valued 911 to date!
Boxters are cheaper and they also feel cheaper IMO.

Have you driven a good 996? They are a brilliant drive... It's an old car now but they certainly don't feel old.

Felt cheaper? How? Aren’t the interiors exactly the same, except for two more gauges in the 996 cluster? Haven’t driven a 996 myself, so I don’t know... but that’s what I’ve read.

masraum 08-20-2019 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevergrowup (Post 10564428)
Felt cheaper? How? Aren’t the interiors exactly the same, except for two more gauges in the 996 cluster? Haven’t driven a 996 myself, so I don’t know... but that’s what I’ve read.

I think I've seen that it's possible to backdate the instrument cluster, but I'm not positive.

sammyg2 08-20-2019 09:20 AM

I heard a boxer is not a real porch .....

Nevergrowup 08-20-2019 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 10564477)
I think I've seen that it's possible to backdate the instrument cluster, but I'm not positive.

I know it’s possible to fit a 5 gauge 996 cluster in the 986, and do some wiring/programming to make it work. But I thought that was all that differs between say a 1999 986 and a 1999 996. Interior-wise, of course, sans the back seats.

smokintr6 08-20-2019 10:17 AM

I voted boxster, would have voted neither if the option existed.

09 and up seems to be the only boxster cayman worth owning unless you like scored cylinders.

onewhippedpuppy 08-20-2019 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 10564420)

I took the same approach! Beautiful car btw, I love the RS60.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevergrowup (Post 10564428)
Felt cheaper? How? Aren’t the interiors exactly the same, except for two more gauges in the 996 cluster? Haven’t driven a 996 myself, so I don’t know... but that’s what I’ve read.

They are almost 100% identical. Most parts interchange. The only thing that could feel cheaper are options between cars. Seats, dash, door panels, trim pieces, all the same.

jhynesrockmtn 08-20-2019 02:07 PM

I have had a 2001 Boxster S and now own a 2004 C4S coupe. I'd vote C4S but loved the Boxster. For me the Gen 1 Boxster was a bit too small in terms of interior room for my frame or I'd probably still have it. I needed another inch or so of seat travel. Longer term I'll likely get a 2009+ Boxster or 911 Cabrio as I miss having a soft top for our climate. The full leather on the C4S makes the interior feel much higher end.

onewhippedpuppy 08-20-2019 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhynesrockmtn (Post 10564942)
I have had a 2001 Boxster S and now own a 2004 C4S coupe. I'd vote C4S but loved the Boxster. For me the Gen 1 Boxster was a bit too small in terms of interior room for my frame or I'd probably still have it. I needed another inch or so of seat travel. Longer term I'll likely get a 2009+ Boxster or 911 Cabrio as I miss having a soft top for our climate. The full leather on the C4S makes the interior feel much higher end.

Full leather is definitely more luxurious but you could get it with a Boxster too. Mine has it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.