|
you get what you pay for. I have been an architect for over 40 years. Provide a client a reasonable fee to do a complete project and most want it for 10% of the real number. So you get what you get, a 10% job or someone who knows 10%v of what they need to know. Potential client was stated their project scope which would have cost north of $800k to build. Gave them a favorable fee. They went with the cheaper person and have now spent well over $200k making it right. Whose to blame? Client for being unrealistic or contractor who did not understand the full scope?
Check references, interview more than one and figure out who you can live with for a year. |
New twist: I asked for further clarification in writing of what is included.
What is NOT included is structural engineering and energy consultant and design fees. So .... I'm going to think about it ... Competition is a good thing but what I'm hearing is, everybody and their dog in So Cal is into home improvement right now so people in that biddness have the luxury of prioritizing what projects they take on. Nothing wrong with that, but maybe this can be a next year or the year after thing. We'll see what the next guy says. |
Quote:
In my career as an engineer in an industrial setting, every time I have had an architect as the lead, it was trouble. Layout of equipment, routing of utilities, unique structural requirements, material and product flow seemed to take a back seat to a pleasing setting. In the commercial setting, I have had better luck but still it was always a struggle to get some of the more engineered (mostly structural and mechanical) parts right. As noted elsewhere in this thread, make sure you are getting what you need. For me, in an industrial setting negotiating code compliance with the AHJ, requires extensive knowledge of you process needs, basis of published codes requirements and a willingness to negotiate with the AHJ. Again I know there are knowledgeable ones out there but they are outnumbered by the ones who dismiss the engineering as a secondary effort. |
Waiting for a slowdown would be a good idea, not sure when that will be though.
One other thing to look out for is a reasonable quote and then lots of costly add on's. The quote I received for the structural engineering for this house was about $3k, similar to others, pretty straight forward ICF build, but once we started pouring concrete the engineers bills started rolling, nothing on the plans were changed, ended up closer to $10k, and not really possible to change engineers part way through. |
Quote:
(perhaps due soley to owner maintenance. IDK.) His other buildings are exceptional. I start looking for what is upstairs every time I see those modern "open-space" first floors with huge ceilings and heavy floors above.. The architect is put into a peculiar position when the the client says "I want it this way, make it happen." |
That happens more than you might think!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think what you’re referring could be summarized as there are designers and there are architects. The problems come when designers put too much stock in their own credentials and insist that their detailing is correct or sufficient when in reality it’s neither. The most successful projects I’ve been on had a great designer, a great architect (different firm), great sub-consultants and most importantly a very knowledgeable client who understands what a successful project needs and is willing to pay for it. |
One thing I have to say is residential construction is a mess without much rules to stick to. This I mean, guys grew up in the trenches can do it all not matter what it looks like at the end of the day. A bunch of hackers, same for those small time architects too. In a commercial or larger project settings, its a bit different. There are consequences. Lots of residential guys will just take a small lost and walk away until the get sue and still, nothing really happens. Its hard to find clients are willing to pay for good solid work or design. The real pros aren't interested in dealing with home homers. There's much better money to be made elsewhere on the larger jobs. With that said, there are a hand full of guys that are involved in residential side of the business that are real pros and do care but I found most aren't willing to pay for that service because the bottom feeders had trained them with their bottom feeding pricing. The illegals add to that and made it even worst. I thank goodness daily for those who screw the home owners. When I walk in, I am treated like royalty.
|
That’s true for architects too. A lot (like me) won’t touch residential work. Fickle, overly-opinionated, cheap owners, bottom-of-the-barrel contractors, etc. make it a “not worth it” game. Sure there are a few (very few) good jobs out there with good clients who can provide some really fun design opportunity but the high-end residential design field is absolutely saturated with designers all chasing those unicorns.
I’m perfectly content to do my “boring” government and commercial clients. They generally have reasonable budgets and pay on time even if I don’t get to play FLW too often. The challenges of pulling a team together to get something done on a big job is rewarding and satisfying too. |
Quote:
I say this WRT a simple addition, not a glass house. You must have some kind of complicated roof tie-in to trigger that kind of cost. |
It looks like this problem is solved, I have a more reasonable quote that I am planning to approve.
For reference, here's an aerial view of what we're looking at. IMO It's not really that big of a deal. Originally I thought it could all be done for under $60k, that may end up being low by $10 or 20k. Kalifornia :rolleyes: The red section is the proposed room addition. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1597765383.jpg there is a breezeway now, so the roof section above it will have to be removed and rebuilt for a larger footprint. Good news is, 2 of the 4 walls are existing. Bad news: the existing slab will need to be ripped up and replaced with a new slab with better reinforcements for earthquakes and such. And the new roof ties into existing. That's where most of the cost is. Interesting enough, there's a similar house a few blocks away that had this modification done to it and it was up for sale a few months ago. It sold in a weekend for what I considered crazy money, but the deal fell through and it went back on the market for a lower price and no one wants to touch it now. Rumors are the modifications were never permitted and might have to be redone. |
Quote:
|
I thought for 6k, that should include energy calc, and the engineering. My opinion is that, have the architect handle it all instead of looking for engineers on your own. Much easier on your sanity.
|
Sanity?
Does that cost extra? BTW the wife says I'm just bored and looking for something to do. Might be a little truth in that. |
That house should be an easy fix if that's case. It may not have to be redone but proof the depth of footing and the framing is correct. Most of the time, the inspector may not even require the ceiling or roof ripped up. I like those, cheap but its risk you take. Worst case it to remove drywall, and fix bar wire job. Demo out the slab to proof there's sufficient rebar in it.
|
Quote:
[signed and inspected and authorized] Just in case the local inspector decides to have a bad hair day. |
One thing about connecting 2 structures that are only connected by an existing breezeway is the continuation of side wall sheathing. Your house may not be of an age where the exterior walls are covered by shear panel. Now it will be by at least 4 feet in each direction with additional hold downs installed over new beefed up footings.
And since that is a garage that you are connecting, the fire codes involved in the garage part will be substantial. So, IOW, when you get the plans, you will see the impact on the existing structures. Their will be as much work going into existing as their will be new. It's crazy. A few years ago my son wanted to add on to a 2 bed house near me. I told him to sell and move to a bigger house (4 bed) instead, which he did. He is way more ahead equity-wise on his current house than he would have been had he spent the money to add on. |
There has been a slow and inexorable march towards retroactive code application in recent years. With each revision of the IBC it gets a little harder to touch “only” an addition and exempt / grandfather the main building... more and more things on the existing structure keep getting pulled in - accessibility upgrades, structural analysis, energy compliance... we’re fast heading to a point where it’s not worth doing additions and makes more sense to just demo and build anew. From a safety standpoint that makes sense and probably is the goal but economically (and artistically) its a steep price.
The longer one waits the harder it’ll be to make an addition or retrofit worthwhile... I imagine in 15-20 years it’ll be all but impossible. |
Were's George (the Architect) when you need him?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website