Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Wanna go fast (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1077448-wanna-go-fast.html)

masraum 11-06-2020 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 11092101)
Every aviation nut really hopes the US military has something so advance the SR-71 is slow by comparison. One of our customers was a SR-71 pilot and had to get special permission from the Air Force for his son to take a photo of him taking off on his last mission.

He said it they were cooking along fast he could not touch the dash area close to the skin of the SR-71 as it was so hot it would burn him through the gloves. The overall length of the SR-71 would grow several inches when hot.

I just find it hard to believe anything can move through the air so fast that in can go cross country in 30 minutes. The laws of physics are laws that can't be broken.

I honestly hope we have aircraft of that performance. Maybe they have tiles like the space shuttle did to withstand the heat of moving through the air. I really hope we have those aircraft.

X43 UAV - reported as having already gone Mach7, and the next test is going to be Mach 10.

flipper35 11-06-2020 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Embraer (Post 11091620)
Within the last 10 years I was a controller at LA Center. I have since moved on to another facility. I worked U2s daily...as they descended BACK into controlled airspace, which was always fun. It was neat talking to the pilot on discrete tac frequency, especially since with his positive pressure suit, he sounded like an astronaut on the radio. When I keyed up, my transmissions would broadcast on several frequencies, tac/uhf/vhf, so every other pilot in my airspace would hear what I was saying to him....but they couldn't hear what he was saying to me. When I'd say "Upon descending back into Class A airspace, would you like to enter the complex at altitude or would you like an enroute descent?" ....about every pilot on frequency would key up and ask what kind of aircraft I was talking to. Of course, mum was the word. It was always great fun. Sometimes it was U2s. Sometimes it wasn't. They would always report their altitude to us as something in coded language ....depending on the week (it was constantly changing...we had a TS panel we had to access beside our scope which gave the key to what which altitude corresponded to what code they told us they were at. These codes were changed all of the time, so we would have to reference that to verify his altitude.

We also had a supersonic corridor that traversed my airspace, as an extension of the Edwards complex. It was routine to see experimental aircraft coming in and out of Groom Lake that were most definitely exceeding (by a large margin) Mach 3 in block altitudes of FL550-590. This was circa 2013-2014. In strange bit of black project humor....they would file their flight plan with bogus AC types listed. IE: XXX as the type. Or sometimes something goofy like an F-4 or F-5. Or a T-38. F-16's would be supersonically flying chase, and the "F5" would walk away at well more than twice the speed they were at.

If you've spent any time in Palmdale, you'd be used to hearing sonic booms in the morning. Still happens over the Mojave desert.

I remember back when the F117 was still black and they had one coming in at night after testing and an F16 was told to watch for an A7 (the cover story was avionics testing on the A7) and the F16 said he had the traffic in sight and it was no F'ing A7.

masraum 11-06-2020 07:31 AM

<iframe width="720" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gWGLAAYdbbc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

GH85Carrera 11-06-2020 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 11092136)
X43 UAV - reported as having already gone Mach7, and the next test is going to be Mach 10.

OK, so a UAV is more like a missile if no human is on board. With no life support to worry about the rules are a lot easier to attain the speed. No easy at all, nut easier. If the interior gets to 200 degrees, no big deal. And a lot of mass is eliminated with no life support or controls or windshield.

masraum 11-06-2020 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 11092143)
OK, so a UAV is more like a missile if no human is on board. With no life support to worry about the rules are a lot easier to attain the speed. No easy at all, nut easier. If the interior gets to 200 degrees, no big deal. And a lot of mass is eliminated with no life support or controls or windshield.

Right, everything that I've seen/read on the subject says that they've stopped the manned super high speed stuff because it is too dangerous. Granted, I don't think the govt tells us everything, and we don't need to know everything.

masraum 11-06-2020 07:58 AM

Probably 7-8 years ago, there was another company doing a thing southeast of Houston where for $5k, you and a buddy would go up in a couple of planes with pilots. You were able to dog fight each other with you flying (being directed by the pilots). I wasn't able to find the same thing, but this looks similar and offers more options. They are all prop propelled planes. The other thing used planes that were actually contemporary military aircraft in some countries. I wanted to do it, but never got around to it. Maybe some day.

https://www.skycombatace.com/

flipper35 11-06-2020 08:01 AM

I have looked at that place seriously a couple times. That would be a hoot to do air combat in those planes.

TxGerman 11-06-2020 08:28 AM

Dog Fight!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 11092179)
Probably 7-8 years ago, there was another company doing a thing southeast of Houston where for $5k, you and a buddy would go up in a couple of planes with pilots. You were able to dog fight each other with you flying (being directed by the pilots). I wasn't able to find the same thing, but this looks similar and offers more options. They are all prop propelled planes. The other thing used planes that were actually contemporary military aircraft in some countries. I wanted to do it, but never got around to it. Maybe some day.

https://www.skycombatace.com/

WOW, just added that to my bucket list!

john70t 11-06-2020 10:08 AM

The thing about the Extra 300/330...they are designed to be spun out of control. They are like a video game. Point in a direction and go. There are videos of them hovering straight up in place a few feet over ground while spinning. Hard to go wrong there.

Not really having to use the principles such as trading speed vs altitude is not really 'flying' though, but yeah I seriously want and have yet to pass out from Gs also.

flipper35 11-06-2020 10:13 AM

I have only seen Wayne Handly hover a plane and that crashed years ago. Any links?

john70t 11-06-2020 10:21 AM

Extra300 Low Hover Practice 2-19-2014
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pW8jf7wAick" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

john70t 11-06-2020 10:23 AM

Extra 300 Tail Touch Hover 3-9-2014
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TnCgXH9U5jk" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

EDIT: Oh stupid me! These are large radio controlled models.....
I thought it had been done in real life.

Wagstaff and Kapanina make it look so easy.

masraum 11-06-2020 10:39 AM

The place that I was looking at years ago, I think used something different.

Found it, this is what they used to use at the place that was here, but is now in Orange County

Air Combat USA
Quote:

SIAI Marchetti SF-260

The SF-260 was designed by the Italian Dott Ing. Stelio Frati: SF stands for SIAI Marchetti (builder) and Frati; 260 denotes the hp. The aircraft was certified in April 1966. Twenty-seven Air Forces fly approximatley 1000 SF 260’s and the USAF has considered the aircraft for its new EFS (Enhanced Flight Screener). Less than 100 (some new, some ex-military) have been imported to the U.S. Others have been used as fighter trainers by NATO forces.

We selected our aircraft with realism in mind. The Marchetti SF260 is a combat ready fighter/trainer. This amazing, fully aerobatic, high-performance aircraft is capable of withstanding the high G, three dimensional, aerobatic environment of the aerial combat arena. We are the only company in the industry to use these aircraft exclusively on our nationwide tour of the United States.

Embraer 11-06-2020 11:16 AM

WB-57 Canberra.....worked these guys in 2011-12 as they flew above FL550 up and down California. They were "SAMP" flights.....collecting data on potential radiation emanating from the Fukushima disaster.

Heel n Toe 11-06-2020 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 11092136)
X43 UAV - reported as having already gone Mach7, and the next test is going to be Mach 10.

This is supposedly "an artist's rendition" or some such thang.

Imagine wheels and tires on it and it's a 2043 F1 car.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1604693993.jpg

GH85Carrera 11-06-2020 11:41 AM

So the title of the thread is not even right if it is just a UAV. Having a really really fast model airplane does not count if no human is inside of it.

greglepore 11-06-2020 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Embraer (Post 11091714)
Before the Rosebowl in 2012, a B2 did the flyover. There were actually two B2's that day over SoCal. DOOM11 and DOOM12. I worked them in holding before I gave the descent on one of them to SoCal Tracon. One stayed at altitude and loitered.

I worked White Knight once, the Scaled Composites SpaceShipOne carrier. That was pretty cool.

We worked SOFIA all of the time, callsign "NASA747"....which is the NASA 747 telescope aircraft. I knew one of the pilots and he offered to let me ride along. I didn't want to hang out on a 747 for 10+ hours. In hindsight, it would have been a cool "this one time...." experience to tell people about.

The Blue Angels train in El Centro during the winter...we'd work them all the time. Of course, we'd work the Thunderbirds all of the time too.

Also...lots of fast things would come from the Pacific Ocean and make their way towards China Lake.

....and well before my time....potentially one of the most catastrophic aviation accidents occurred when an F16 nose dived from FL280 and crashed JUST outside LA Center. If the center would have been hit, besides the controller deaths, there would have been cascading repercussions.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-03-23-me-542-story.html

sorry for the hijack...love talking about my time at ZLA.

Great read. Went to pee and sent the bird into an uncontrolled roll...bet that was quite the board of inquiry.

javadog 11-06-2020 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 11092101)
Every aviation nut really hopes the US military has something so advance the SR-71 is slow by comparison. One of our customers was a SR-71 pilot and had to get special permission from the Air Force for his son to take a photo of him taking off on his last mission.

He said it they were cooking along fast he could not touch the dash area close to the skin of the SR-71 as it was so hot it would burn him through the gloves. The overall length of the SR-71 would grow several inches when hot.

I just find it hard to believe anything can move through the air so fast that in can go cross country in 30 minutes. The laws of physics are laws that can't be broken.

I honestly hope we have aircraft of that performance. Maybe they have tiles like the space shuttle did to withstand the heat of moving through the air. I really hope we have those aircraft.

We don't have any manned aircraft that will outdo the SR71. It's top speed was a little higher than claimed, as was it's service ceiling. I spent an hour on the phone with Brian Shul a few years ago and lets say they always had something in reserve if they really needed to get the hell out of dodge.

We do have an AF jet that's faster than the published specs but it uses fuel at such a rate it can't go that far at it's top speed. You wouldn't believe it's fuel burn rate.

Glen, I hope you got to see the SR71 that flew into OKC in the late 80's, for a stopover on it's way to the east coast for museum duty.

GH85Carrera 11-06-2020 07:18 PM

Yep, I was at the air show and watched it fly over and land. Looked at it up close. It was awesome.

javadog 11-07-2020 06:47 AM

Yeah, I attended that as well. Came back the next day to watch it depart. Can't remember where it was... OKC airport? Vance? Don't think it was at Tinker...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.