Wayne 962 |
05-13-2021 09:51 AM |
Here's a clip from Bloomberg today:
Quote:
The Tesla chief executive officer’s latest tweet left some crypto proponents befuddled. It’s odd that the company would reject Bitcoin as a method of payment while still retaining its holdings, said Vijay Ayyar, head of Asia Pacific at crypto exchange Luno Pte in Singapore. “It doesn’t add up,” Ayyar said.
Also unclear is why Musk decided to act now. The massive electrical cost associated with Bitcoin mining has long been criticized by detractors and held up as a reason why mainstream institutions will ultimately reject the asset class. Whatever his motivations, Musk’s latest pronouncement is likely to be welcomed by Bitcoin skeptics.
“Cryptos are heading for a world of pain,” Peter Berezin, chief global strategist at BCA Research in Montreal, wrote in a recent report with colleagues. “ESG concerns will force companies to step back from their newfound infatuation with these magic beans.”
|
In case anyone hasn't figured this out yet, I'm not a fan of Bitcoin, or other high-energy-consuming crypto currencies. As I stated earlier in this thread, I think that Bitcoin is version 1.0.0 of crypto. It's dang good, and other than the energy usage, fork issues and block size limitations, it's not bad for a first start. But I think it's doomed due to these limitations.
Version two needs to have a timed-element to blockchain mining. Right now, it's just a brute force race to see who can decode the fastest. That encourages power consumption. If mining were somewhat more randomly dispersed (using timestamps), then one would set up miners to wait, and then be awarded transaction points / processing payments somewhat randomly. It would turn the market into more transactional based - where the miners would be distributed payments to process instead of racing to process like the current system. Again, a good version 1.0.0, but as it stands right now, it's somewhat broken (in my opinion).
-Wayne
|