Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Space X Starship Explodes (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1138560-space-x-starship-explodes.html)

masraum 04-20-2023 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevej37 (Post 11978927)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HV2UoWhV7qs" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...54/156/700.png

https://imgk.timesnownews.com/story/...,h-300,fo-auto

unclebilly 04-20-2023 02:33 PM

thereby proving for the 87655th time that the earth is flat…

LEAKYSEALS951 04-20-2023 02:39 PM

Did anybody get reminded of an led flashight when they saw the new engine layout firing from below?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1682030316.jpg

stevej37 04-20-2023 03:00 PM

^^^ Yes...it looked like a third of them hadn't fired up.
Off-brand spark plugs??

LEAKYSEALS951 04-20-2023 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevej37 (Post 11978960)
^^^ Yes...it looked like a third of them hadn't fired up.
Off-brand spark plugs??

Yeah, I spent the whole drive home after work trying to figure out how the remaining gimbles would cant the thrust to compensate. :D
I think it was in more trouble than it appeared. That it got so far is pretty darn amazing. Personally, I thought the weight of it all would cause a structural collapse right on the pad.

I'm bummed I will have to wait several months for a follow up shot! :)

Hats off to Space X.

stevej37 04-20-2023 05:19 PM

I've always had excellent results with NGK plugs.
I'll bet they used Autolites.

Jeff Alton 04-20-2023 09:09 PM

So a total failure/screw up that they try to spin into a win because it "cleared the tower"? OK....

KNS 04-21-2023 03:41 AM

Boca Chica, TX
 
About a year ago I checked out (on Google Maps) a satellite view of the sleepy little gulf coast community of Boca Chica, TX where Space X has their new launch facility. While the satellite image at that time was probably a couple years old it was just a sleepy little coastal village with a couple dozen homes and nothing more.

Looking at Google Maps now you can see the massive new Space X complex and the launch pad just down the road. The little community is still there adjacent the facility but I noticed, on Google street view of Weems St, half the homes have Teslas parked in the driveways. I wonder if Musk simply bought out all the homeowners.

Edit: I guess Space X did buy out a lot of the community:

https://nypost.com/2023/02/18/residents-of-musks-texas-space-city-rip-billionaire-for-destroying-quiet-beach-town/

beepbeep 04-21-2023 04:05 AM

It was a success.

It is twice as powerful as Saturn V.
They have five more built, with additional improvement.
It cleared the tower.
They learned a ton....for example a need to have proper flame trench. I reckon most engines failed due to debris damage.


What I found most impressive is that whole stack survived multiple somersaults...ith stages still docked together! Also, it kept going up with multiple engines out. That thing is built like proverbial brick house.

Old space laughed 10 years ago at hist Falcon prototype. Now he has market cornered and ULA/Boeing/Arianespace are surviving on goverment dole and playing catch up. Falcon 9 has 95% of the market.

Seahawk 04-21-2023 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KNS (Post 11979320)
Looking at Google Maps now you can see the massive new Space X complex and the launch pad just down the road.

I never thought to look. That is interesting.

Bob Kontak 04-21-2023 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrochex (Post 11978753)
Twice the thrust of the Saturn V, yikes!

Saturn V thrust was 7.6 million pounds and they ramped it up to 9.0 million for launching Skylab.

KFC911 04-21-2023 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Kontak (Post 11979334)
Saturn V thrust was 7.6 million pounds and they ramped it up to 9.0 million for launching Skylab.

I saw the Saturn V that Neil rode being tested on the launch pad back in July of '69...

It was a BIG cucumber :D!

Tervuren 04-21-2023 04:40 AM

From my experiences in a game called BeamNG Drive, the forces of a long object doing somersaults can be quite destructive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beepbeep (Post 11979326)
What I found most impressive is that whole stack survived multiple somersaults...ith stages still docked together! Also, it kept going up with multiple engines out. That thing is built like proverbial brick house.


beepbeep 04-21-2023 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Kontak (Post 11979334)
Saturn V thrust was 7.6 million pounds and they ramped it up to 9.0 million for launching Skylab.

Per Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship

Maximum thrust: Tf16,700,000 lbf :eek:

masraum 04-21-2023 05:02 AM

<iframe width="720" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FrGu1MLqIFE" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

flatbutt 04-21-2023 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beepbeep (Post 11979326)
.....
They learned a ton....for example a need to have proper flame trench. I reckon most engines failed due to debris damage.
.......

That surprised me. NASA learned that lesson early on and it is well documented.

beepbeep 04-21-2023 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flatbutt (Post 11979379)
That surprised me. NASA learned that lesson early on and it is well documented.

If you look at the replay you can see huge swathes of concrete being blown away like tumbleweed. That can't be good for engines. At the same time. High water table at Bocachicka is apparently making it very difficult to dig.

beepbeep 04-21-2023 05:41 AM

P.S. I just read that there are no separation charges...Starship needs booster to "flip" it away...and it must be hard to do if you loose so many engines. I see proper flame trench and redesigned separation coming.

But as many large vehicles, it is mighty fault tolerant.

masraum 04-21-2023 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flatbutt (Post 11979379)
That surprised me. NASA learned that lesson early on and it is well documented.

Right. Why they thought "meh, we don't need that" is a little surprising. I suspect there's someone at SpaceX thinking "I freakin' told you", and someone else is thinking "I hope no one remember that I told them it was unnecessary." THe funny thing is that I'm picturing the guy that said "we don't need that" as Musk himself. LOL

Pazuzu 04-21-2023 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KNS (Post 11979320)
About a year ago I checked out (on Google Maps) a satellite view of the sleepy little gulf coast community of Boca Chica, TX where Space X has their new launch facility. While the satellite image at that time was probably a couple years old it was just a sleepy little coastal village with a couple dozen homes and nothing more. ]

About 2 years ago, before they started really resting the Starships, a local guy drove down there and basically drove through the gates, right up to a short fence. He could nearly reach over and touch one of the starships sitting there waiting for testing.

The point of his article was that right *then*, you could basically stand next to history because SpaceX was so lasse faire about everything. He mentioned that once the first starship was going to be tested, everything would change, they'd become very by-the-books, and you'd never have that opportunity again.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.