![]() |
Quote:
Came right across my property to the East. I watched it for well over 10 minutes.....she just kept going and going. Incredible swirls coming off her at times. Just a perfect night for a launch! |
Space & rocket launch thread
While Mrs Bugs n I were enjoying the fruits of my summer labor in our new hot tub, got to see the what I thought was a Starlink deployment of more satellites. Only the second time I’ve seen this, and her first. Also saw the ISS pass overhead, a handful of regular satelights, a shooting star and the milky way. In all a good 20 minutes after spending all day working a drainage culvert.
After looking at the SpaceX site, it was a rideshare launch with multiple deployments, not Starlink sats. https://spacenews.com/spacex-launches-ninth-dedicated-rideshare-mission/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
T-minus 16 minutes........
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5z0IBHQKHpk" title="Watch live: SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket to launch 23 Starlink satellites from Cape Canaveral" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> Watch live coverage as SpaceX launches a Falcon 9 rocket with second-generation Starlink internet satellites. Liftoff from pad 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station is scheduled during a launch window that opens at 11:20 p.m. EST (0420 UTC) tonight. The first-stage booster will land on the drone ship 'Just Read the Instructions' in the Atlantic Ocean. This will be the 87th orbital launch of 2023 for SpaceX. |
Watch live coverage as SpaceX launches a Falcon 9 rocket with 23 second-generation Starlink internet satellites. Liftoff from pad 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station is scheduled for 11:41 p.m. EST (0441 UTC) tonight. The first-stage booster will land on the drone ship 'Just Read the Instructions' about eight and a half minutes into the flight. The Starlink 6-33 mission will be the 90th SpaceX orbital launch of 2023.
Our live coverage from Cape Canaveral, with commentary by Will Robinson-Smith, will begin about an hour before launch. <iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tWFG4J78XYQ" title="Watch live: SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches from Cape Canaveral with 23 Starlink satellites" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
We had another one this morning. Used to be 2 or 3 launches a year. Now we're at 2 a month. They are fun to watch. I was on base for a few years ago. That was an experience.
https://www.noozhawk.com/spacex-launch-marks-west-coasts-20th-starlink-mission-of-2023/ |
Quote:
Not sure if this one gets off tonight......bit windy out...... <iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6qe8c9jnQWU" title="Watch live: SpaceX launches Starlink satellite from Cape Canaveral on Falcon 9 rocket" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
|
Amazing night launch.....woohoo! So cool when we have some clouds! One of these days I'll get a decent enough camera to get some good pics.
Couple buds of mine here do this and I'm sure will be posting theirs on FB so I'll look for them and post tomorrow...... |
Falcon heavy launch....and some heavy window rattling going on!
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wnfddhDuWDE" title="Watch live: SpaceX Falcon Heavy launches secretive X-37B military spaceplane" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
|
Thanks for posting this Baz.
|
Watch live coverage as the United Launch Alliance Vulcan Centaur rocket will launches on its inaugural flight with the Peregrine commercial robotic lunar lander for Astrobotic. Peregrine will carry multiple experiments, scientific instruments, and tech demo payloads for NASA and other customers.
Liftoff from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station is scheduled for 2:18 a.m. EST (0718 UTC) at the opening of a 45-minute launch window. Rocket set to release remains of 330 people, including George Washington, JFK and ‘Star Trek’ cast into space: ‘Permanent memorial’ Watch Vulcan rocket launch private Peregrine moon lander on debut mission early Jan. 8 First US moon landing in decades to launch Just over 1 hour away....... <iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gHUJ3m_xEb0" title="Watch live: ULA's Vulcan rocket, carrying lunar lander, launches for the first time" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Launch went off as planned.........glad I stayed up for it!
More here: <iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gWaI3H1NKlQ" title="US successfully launches first moon landing mission in decades | Morning in America" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Sounds like that Lunar Lander is in trouble now and can't keep its solar array to the sun. An "Anomaly" has happened
|
Quote:
Update 12:45 p.m ET: Astrobotic has issued an update on the anomaly its Peregrine lunar lander experienced. "We have successfully re-established communications with Peregrine after the known communication blackout. The team's improvised maneuver was successful in reorienting Peregrine's solar array towards the sun." The lander is now charging its battery. Astrobotic continues to investigate the cause of the anomaly, which it believes to be a "failure within the propulsion system" aboard Peregrine. https://www.space.com/private-astrobotic-peregrine-moon-lander-suffers-anomaly |
We got one scheduled for tomorrow from Vandenberg. It's been postponed a number of times.
Latest update is that they are expecting to launch about one a week in 2024. https://www.edhat.com/news/rocket-launches-from-vandenberg-to-increase-this-year/ |
With this weather system it's going to be dicey at best I would bet.
|
I'm curious - A few of these commercial start-ups have invested a lot to fly cargo and crews to the international space station. I think private operators getting into the business is great.
The ISS is supposed to be decommissioned in 2030. Where will these private companies fly to then? |
|
|
|
|
Live coverage from NASA's Kennedy Space Center as a new crew prepares for launch to the International Space Station aboard the SpaceX Dragon capsule Endeavour. Liftoff from pad 39A, atop a Falcon 9 rocket, is scheduled for Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:53 p.m. EST (0353 UTC Monday).
Aboard the Crew 8 mission are NASA astronauts Matthew Dominick, commander; Michael Barratt, pilot; and Jeanette Epps, mission specialist; as well as Roscosmos cosmonaut Alexander Grebenkin. They are embarking on a six-month tour of duty aboard the orbiting outpost. The crew will head to the launch pad around 7:40 p.m. EST (0040 UTC) to board the SpaceX Dragon capsule. Commentary will be provided by Will Robinson-Smith from the Spaceflight Now news bureau at the Kennedy Space Center Press Site. <iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pdyis00_Mww" title="Watch live: SpaceX and NASA launch crew to the space station" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
That was a good one! :)
|
Here are the official causes of the 2nd Starship flight.
Thinking of the dynamics of all these things happening @ 28,000 mph is fascinating stuff. https://spacenews.com/faa-closes-investigation-into-second-starship-test-flight/ |
Heads up for the west coaster's here, there's supposed to be a launch out of VB this afternoon at @2PM.
I'm hoping the clouds are sparse enough we might see it down here in the OC. |
This is a cool, unique perspective, https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci/space-capsule-reentry-video.html
|
Quote:
1 filter getting plugged on 1 engine, and it results in LOS. there are 33 in the first stage, and 6 in the second. how many of you would roll the dice? i have no doubt that with enough money and time, starship could work. but why bother when we already have SLS that actually works, and has already put artemis in lunar orbit? |
|
Thanks for the link.
We'll probably get cloud cover but might luck out. |
T minus 18 minutes......
Watch live coverage as SpaceX launches a Falcon 9 rocket with 23 second-generation Starlink internet satellites. Liftoff from pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center is scheduled for 9:25 p.m. EDT (0125 UTC) on Wednesday, Mar. 13. The first-stage booster, making its 19th flight, will land on the drone ship 'A Shortfall of Gravitas about eight and a half minutes into the flight. The mission, designated Starlink 6-43, will be the 25th Falcon 9 launch of the year. <iframe width="720" height="405" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dte8ohF3enM" title="Watch Live: SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches 23 Starlink satellites from Florida" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Last night's Falcon 9 (Starlink 6-44) here in Florida (previous post) was delayed until tonight.
Starship Orbital Flight Test 3 however went up this AM at Starbase, Boca Chica Beach, Texas....... <iframe width="718" height="404" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NWM1NQ1tZEU" title="LIVE: SpaceX attempts third Starship launch" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> EDIT: Signal lost on the booster landing....said not all the raptor engines fired and they lost the booster.....at 1100 KMPH & 0 altitude on the telemetry not surprising. Stay tuned.... |
My Dad was in wiring engineering and test for the Saturn V. I remember building balsa wood models of the lander, and having a 3' tall toy Sat V. Stunning how far we've come in 50 years.
|
Quote:
this strategy of launching before working out the basic bugs is really failing them. they had major fuel leaks in the second launch too. no reason to a lunch a half a billion dollars before you get the hose clamps to seal. no one cares if you can open the doors (lol), if you have holes in the thing and fuel leaking out everywhere so you can't stay on course. its really quite pathetic, esp when NASA already has orbited the moon with artemis 1 on the SLS. and dont kid yourself, this isnt musk burning his own money up, we paid 3 billion for starship, and its largely gone (over 2 billion spent already), and have nothing to show for it. a fantastic waste of resources. maybe the raptor engines are useful to someone later on ... |
|
Quote:
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/03/thursdays-starship-flight-provided-a-glimpse-into-a-future-of-abundant-access-to-space/ I am not really a fan of Musk, but SpaceX is doing a pretty good job at throwing test articles up there and making progress on each launch. As they say, Space is hard. |
Quote:
but like, its not there, and it wont be there untill they launch it dozens of more times. i mean stuff they claimed to have sorted out, still didnt work. like the first stage just you know, not landing. if the first stage doesn't land, MOST of the cost savings isnt there. who cares if the empty tin can of a shell lands and can be reused if the 33 raptor engines hit the ocean at mach 2? that was the expensive part, and the part that they claimed works great. and the empty tin can still didnt land either. the thing with SLS is it works. and its largely already paid for. so any comparison for future costs, is just not true. starship doesn't work, and wont work, and be safe for humans, for dozens of launches. so far, while SLS is expensive, it does a thing. starship is going to be even more expensive to develop, and still doesnt do the thing. so it has a zero return. none. zero. space is hard. thats why software program management doesnt work for its development. you dont launch with known problems, and then wonder why it didnt work and call it a success. |
Analysis has shown the two of the three engines on the heavy booster didn't sustain operation to simulate a soft landing on the ocean surface and it broke up because of that.
That beast was under control until that time. The comparison of capabilities fully justifies what is being done. The ROI is real. https://www.inverse.com/innovation/sls-vs-starship |
Would be good to see an updated analysis of ROI. That article is from March 2022.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website