![]() |
Any fun guesses post testing? Looks close *behind* Redbull, between Ferrari, Mercedes and McLaren. Seems not all were running all that hard engine wise and focusing on testing long runs on C3 compound used for the first race. So the ranking is flattering for Ferrari but nah.
The new "RB", aka Toro rosso aka alpha tauri could be above all the rest from what I saw... My main surprise was Aston, not as fast as expected... |
A question for Captain: Why not make F1 cars smaller? We see the comparative diagrams of how cars have gotten so much larger over the years. But what if the regulations forced the cars to be smaller? Wouldn't that somewhat decrease their speeds (smaller cross-sectional area, but offset by less aero surfaces & less tire)? Smaller size should make passing on the increasing number of street courses easier, right? Or would driver safety suffer due to less crash protection? Or does the FIA/Formula 1 not really care?
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Looks like the powertrain takes up quite a bit of length. The long front overhang being the other issue. I think you hit the nail with driver safety. |
Quote:
https://www.racefans.net/2020/05/27/f1s-minimum-car-weight-to-rise-again-in-2021-and-2022/ https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/why-are-f1-cars-so-big/ I'm not a big fan of today's supersized F1 cars Since I started back in the V10 era, designing a F1 car design is now infinetly more complicated and more detailed which directly conflicts against reducing weight or the size Reducing weight is near impossible, reducing size will compromise safety and over taking New aero rules coming include active aero so more weight/complexity and new V6 hybrid era will be more weight due to larger battery To make everything smaller, lighter simpler is not really an option unless F1 went to NA 4 cylinder ICE's, smaller wheels, fueled pit stops or shorter races, slower speeds and reduced driver safety |
Its scary to think of what Newey might be able to do with active aero.
It would be fascinating to see the all the ideas he has and the process of getting them onto the car. |
Quote:
So write the rules to try to deliberately oppose that. Is there no way to create the regulations to make the cars simpler with the goal/intended consequence of making them smaller (without compromising safety) and perhaps slower? Were the cars back in the V10 days so much less safe than those of today? Is the racing more exciting now than back then? Forget this power unit garbage (is it really pushing trickle-down technology into road cars?) and additional active aero (won't that just make them faster, like active suspension?). Allow refueling. Even those inbred hicks in NASCAR seem to be able to refill their racecars without setting themselves on fire every weekend--and they've got a lot more cars and a lot more races to do so over the course of a season. Or would the teams and fans then complain about F1 cars not reflecting the pinnacle of motorsports technology? Or am I an Andretti with no understanding of what it takes to make an F1 car? |
Part of the issue is the F1 push for green. They want the complicated engine, electric system, and heat recovery system for the carbon neutral push.
|
Quote:
UK Ministry of Defense thinks so too as they are on a big recruitment drive for top level motorsport experienced folk F1 is the pinnacle of motorsport technology but at the same time has to be relevant to future roadcar technology This is why the tyre/wheel size was increased from 13" and the new 2026 PU rules are 50% battery and 50% ICE using sustainable fuels with active aero. MGU-H ie turbo electric motor and active variable intake trumpets will both be obsolete, considered too complicated/costly for road cars F1 is quite good at making the complicated more complicated but teams have to do this to stay competitive Had breakfast with an F1 team CTO this morning and we both agree from 2026 will be the start of a PU war I've worked through F1 tyre, aero/chassis, spend as much as you have wars but not done a PU war yet so very much looking forward to it Future FIA development PU freeze plan seems well thought out, both battery and ICE new for 2026, frozen until 2028 when a new battery can be introduced and spec frozen for 2yrs, then 2029 a new ICE can be introduced and spec.frozen for 2yrs Along side this I know the FIA have plans to reduce the minimum weight and size of cars Not sure if it will make the racing anymore exciting but think it's pointing F1 in the right direction |
On another note just got through the latest season of Drive to Survive on Netflix, really well done showing all the drama of last year, my wife even enjoyed it
This year should be really interesting! |
Quote:
We were there supporting the US/UK work related to the Continuous at Sea Deterrent (Trident SLBM systems). It was funny to contrast his (go fast and change as quickly as possible/necessary!) and my (different is bad, better is different therefore better is bad) core professions. What a strange world to _not_ be striving to do things exactly as they were 40y ago... Progress rather than engineering archaeology. As interesting as Whitehall and as charming(?) as Reading/Aldermaston/Burghfield are, it would have been cool to take one of those trips to see the F1 machine. Perhaps the Nuclear Weapons Industrial Complex should champion a racing league of "brand new" cars built just as they were in 1982? |
So, did I read this right? Thur Practice, Fri Quali, and race on Saturday?
for the first two races? |
|
^That is very cool. The pilot needs to work on braking though.
I'm surprised the audio was as good as it was. |
Quote:
|
|
Christian Horner will continue as team principle and the investigation/case closed . On to Bahrain .
|
He's either been cleared, someone has been paid off or he's survived an internal attack
Bet this is how he's feeling today... http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1709137203.jpg |
It’s ON!
Glued to the TV again this year as we get underway. It’s going to be a good year! |
After watching FP1/FP2 today I think RB and Ferrari are holding back on turning the engines up . Mercedes have pace but are their engines turned up ? VCarb look decent and so does Williams . Piastri had pace Lando was way off . Hulk had good pace Kmag not so much . Sauber Stake and Alpine not looking good . Summary: don't know anything yet :D
|
FP2 was interesting and gave hope, temporarily, but...
The long runs were more revealing. Max was hitting laps within a 10th of a second lap after lap with one elbow out the door, with a nice gap over anyone else. As ever it's likely to be an interesting fight...for second and third. Me, I love underdogs and the new Alpine road car, so I picked them as my team for a bit. Dead last. My curse strikes again. |
Quote:
|
good thing has and Alpine are checking all of the boxes that Andretti couldn't lol
|
Great qualifying, good job by NH in the Haas
Now can we get this Horner stuff cleaned up prior to the race please, either fire him or show the evidence. RB not saying anything is not a good look for them. |
Yeah good quali, but I hate to say it, looks like Deja Vu all over again.
Seems nothing much has changed except for Damon Hill's new jacket. |
Quote:
Set a goal and achieve it, is better than "we'll see" like Gunther did. |
Quote:
|
I think it's fair to acknowledge MAX as a driver. The redbull is a good car but look at Perez again, 6th !!! Looks like it could be a fun season if Max does not take off tomorrow at race pace.
At least there is some hope - a lucky development break like MacLaren last year and boom ? Ottmar must be laughing his ass off.. My team is dead last as expected... Ouch. Ironic for a brand that makes the lightest sports car on sale ! |
Quote:
The new guy is just babysitting it. Next year we'll see what he can do. |
Quote:
Rearrange these words for the reason why both cars are dead last Arrogance Interfering Incompotent French Makes me both angry and sad to see what's happened to a once mighty, multiple world championship winning team :(:mad: Everyone at Enstone deserves better which is why I hope Andretti buy their entry and run it as a F1 team should be run :cool: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Same as it ever was…
You can’t tell me it’s just a good driver and aerodynamics for Max, 31 seconds ahead after 16 laps, come on! |
Maybe they should grid them in reverse order next race just so there's some racing to watch as they go up through the field.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just read now, the Technical Director Matt Harman and Head of Aero Dirk de Beer both resigned earlier this year and leave the team this April In just over 6 months the team has fired or lost their team principle, sporting director, CTO, technical director, head of aero, production manager, strategic advisor, and legal head All extremely good at their jobs with decades of being successful in F1 while winning many F1 championships New team principle has 2 years of F1 experience, 17 months of that being CEO of Alpine F1 engines |
Did you all notice Adrian Newey never stops smiling ? That's how they do it.
Max could stop for a snack and still win. Could get a Ham sandwich and a cuppa, and not spill a drop. Anyway I'm routin' for K Mag here on in. |
Sargeant passed Riccairdo. There is hope for the young American.
Amended: nope. Gonna be a long season if you’re not a Red Bull fan. |
^^^ :rolleyes:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1709410077.png |
Max and RB are just superior there is no question about that . I am glad to see Sainz do well and go for it . Good for him . I think the Haas chassis is much better than last years . Logan better start updating his resume .
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website