cabmandone |
02-16-2025 04:40 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by masraum
(Post 12411891)
My guess is that the bank, in an effort to make customers happy has refunded money despite the fact that they can and probably should have let the customer take their lumps. So the bank, is doing this to keep customers happy under the guise of "we're protecting you", but it's really protecting itself.
|
The bank has to protect itself because people would be bashing banks if they said "well... sucks to be you" Easy to find negative reviews is a powerful tool. And seldom does the person making that negative review look at their own actions that might have led to a negative outcome.
For example: I bought some rechargeable batteries for my cellular trial cameras. Many reviews said they don't work in the camera. I got mine and sure enough they didn't work. I left a one star review. I then changed it to a five star explaining that it was user error, not the battery. The battery did not come with instructions for making a battery type change in settings. A simple change in the camera setup and the batteries worked fine.
A lot of people aren't willing to own up to their mistakes and put blame where the blame might not belong.
I once gave back my profit on a machine to a customer who filled his machine with fuel that did not have anti gel in it. The fuel gelled causing the high pressure pump to operate without an lubrication and it burned up. I drove a four hour round trip to troubleshoot, paid for a tech to confirm my suspicion and the customer still wanted more. At that point I told him "look at your invoice. You'll see As Is with no warranty expressed or implied. Be thankful I'm doing what I am." He quickly changed his tune
|