Dear Mr NeoCon

[MikeCT]

In my last letter, I claimed that I urge you to join me in my quest to fight jealous survivalists, and that claim is even more true now. Let me begin by saying that documents written by Mr. NeoCon's chums typically include the line, "It is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that NeoCon should be even slightly inconvenienced", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that unlike NeoCon, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- he were not actually responsible for trying to bamboozle people into believing that his decisions are based on reason, then I'd stop saying that I feel no more personal hatred for NeoCon than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. Looking at it on the bright side, NeoCon sometimes uses the word "consubstantiationist" when describing his ultimata. Beware! This is a buzzword designed for emotional response. Is there a chance that he isn't primitive, stolid, and nettlesome? From what I've seen, I doubt it.

Whenever anyone states the obvious -- that according to him, anyone who points this out is guilty of spreading lies, smears, and misoneism -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "What is his secret agenda?" To turn that question around, whatever happened to community standards? People often ask me that question. It's a difficult question to answer, however, because the querist generally wants a simple, concise answer. He doesn't want to hear a long, drawn-out explanation about how we must try our level best to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that I am not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that his coadjutors often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. In contrast, one of history's clearest lessons is that relative even to nativism-prone hippies, NeoCon is more excitable, more violent, less sexually restrained, more impulsive, more prone to crime, less altruistic, less inclined to follow rules, and less cooperative. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: His position that he has his moral compass in tact is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. As will become apparent some day, his tracts are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of fogyism.

NeoCon's argument that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct is hopelessly flawed and entirely circuitous. On the surface, it would seem merely that the union of theory and practice, in NeoCon's hands, becomes a union of pomposity and animalism. But the truth is that NeoCon doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. I feel that he has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. NeoCon obviously has none, or he wouldn't batten on the credulity of the ignorant. It would be a crying shame to let dour, brutal sluggards concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.

I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, NeoCon is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead. I once told him that words cannot convey the hurt and despair that I and so many others feel for those who were personally attacked by NeoCon. How did NeoCon respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that a maladroit spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to take advantage of a rare opportunity to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. It's that simple. This march into self-pitying defeatism is not happening by mere chance. It is not, as many sick, unreasonable sinister-types insist, the result of the natural, inevitable course of things. It is happening as a direct result of NeoCon's effete wisecracks.

What this underlines, I think, is that time cannot change NeoCon's behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which NeoCon can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. When I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Life is too short to have to put up with NeoCon." If you think about it, you'll see his point. Okay, I admit that he is not interested in a true and honest improvement of social conditions, but rather in a way to distract people from serious analysis of the situation. But he pompously claims that censorship could benefit us. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. I would like to close by saying that in plain language, Mr. NeoCon's confreres have been trained, organized, and motivated to send the wrong message to children.

hahaha http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

[azasadny]

whatever...

[Burnin' oil]

I was going to ask someone to summarize but Art seems to have taken care of it . . .

[creaturecat]

didn't take long for your point to be proven MikeCT - 2 posts right on the Neocon money - I predict foul language,personal insults and belittlement around the corner........

[fintstone]

???

[MikeCT]

If you don't try out the link I think you miss the joke.

I have some very startling, very radical -- some might say witless -- insights into Azasadny's latest solutions. There are a number of reasons Azasadny isn't telling us as to why he wants to goad dour nymphomaniacs into hurling epithets at his enemies. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that mankind needs to do more to condemn his hypocrisy. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that the main dissensus between me and Azasadny is that I believe that Azasadny's press releases are sheer idiocy. He, on the other hand, contends that his methods of interpretation prevent smallpox. Already, some antisocial, twisted bimbos have begun to lower our standard of living, and with terrifying and tragic results. What memoranda will follow from their camp is anyone's guess.

It takes more than a mass of ill-bred bestial-types to name and shame Azasadny's worshippers for their censorious acts of absenteeism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to spread awareness of the boisterous nature of Azasadny's teachings. However much Azasadny may deny it, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. He easily impresses his proxies using big words like "uncontradictableness". I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: His expostulations are a mixture of baleful self-righteousness and jackbooted duplicity. Sorry for babbling so much, but failure to analyze the moonstruck -- and what one can term only vile -- underpinnings of Azasadny's histrionics will pigeonhole people into predetermined categories.

[dd74]

Well, I just got through with a big nasty neocon thread yesterday, and here another starts. Since then (yesterday), I've concluded "neocon" is a movement, not an individual. Like Members Only jackets - they were a movement, and not at all individual.

[dd74]

Originally posted by MikeCT
If you don't try out the link I think you miss the joke.

I have some very startling, very radical -- some might say witless -- insights into Azasadny's latest solutions. There are a number of reasons Azasadny isn't telling us as to why he wants to goad dour nymphomaniacs into hurling epithets at his enemies. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that mankind needs to do more to condemn his hypocrisy. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that the main dissensus between me and Azasadny is that I believe that Azasadny's press releases are sheer idiocy. He, on the other hand, contends that his methods of interpretation prevent smallpox. Already, some antisocial, twisted bimbos have begun to lower our standard of living, and with terrifying and tragic results. What memoranda will follow from their camp is anyone's guess.

It takes more than a mass of ill-bred bestial-types to name and shame Azasadny's worshippers for their censorious acts of absenteeism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to spread awareness of the boisterous nature of Azasadny's teachings. However much Azasadny may deny it, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. He easily impresses his proxies using big words like "uncontradictableness". I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: His expostulations are a mixture of baleful self-righteousness and jackbooted duplicity. Sorry for babbling so much, but failure to analyze the moonstruck -- and what one can term only vile -- underpinnings of Azasadny's histrionics will pigeonhole people into predetermined categories.

Damn! And here I am, twenty-five years after the fact, still thinking "nanoo-nanoo" is deep phraseology.

[fintstone]

And the left have the nerve to claim that southerners deserted the party. The liberals deserted to a different reality.

[MikeCT]

Originally posted by dd74
Damn! And here I am, twenty-five years after the fact, still thinking "nanoo-nanoo" is deep phraseology.

it is!!

[dd74]

Originally posted by MikeCT
it is!!

[fintstone]

Originally posted by SoCal911SC
/whilst rapping on some skulls/

It's a JOKE, people! A joke!

This is what I am referring to...not the silly calculator:

"didn't take long for your point to be proven MikeCT - 2 posts right on the Neocon money - I predict foul language,personal insults and belittlement around the corner........"

[RoninLB]

We should all involve the world in big hugs and kisses then everything and everybody will be happy.

[RANDY P]

Nice link!

[CarreraCab]

Damn!! I guess I had a few too many Jim Beam Manhattans with dinner tonight, I'll try this post tomorrow ? WTF? Doug