![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
|
What do you know about Jeep Wranglers?
Saw one yesterday that had a canoe tied to the top bars, three bikes attached to the hitch, big a$$ tires, pretty cool and rugged. I heard Jeeps aren't too reliable though. I'd like to hear from Wrangler owners if this is true. May get one someday.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
before pcars, all i did was jeeps ( i still own a jeep scrambler that i am gonna restore). honestly, your description above sounds like a poseur mobile. on on my backcountry outings with friends, i always seemed to be the most disadvantaged of the group when it came to storage, and carrying things. there just isnt enough cargo/passenger space. one canoe, and three bikes will need some equipement to go along with it. i will assume three passengers, so they didnt have much room. but they have plenty of offroad ability. bay area 4x4's dont see much dirt.
i went canoe shopping this weekend. i will probably, strap it to the forester.
__________________
poof! gone |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
IMO, they are very archaic in design, get utterly horrible gas mileage and are very uncomfortable. Seems the aerodynamics are similar to putting a sheet of plywood up, vertically, on the front of a modern car.
However, they can get where most other 4 wheelers cannot.
__________________
Warren & Ron, may you rest in Peace. |
||
![]() |
|
Seldom Seen Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Posts: 3,584
|
I have a wrangler. Sub 15 mpg, cramped, bouncy uncomfortable ride, lots of road noise, etc. But, it can go almost anywhere and is unbeatable in the snow, which is why I have it.
__________________
Why do things that happen to white trash always happen to me? Got nachos? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Seldom Seen Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Posts: 3,584
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Go with a LandCruiser. It'll outrun a Heep any day of the week.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There is nothing to be learned from the second kick of a mule" - Mark Twain |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
|
Quote:
I'm thinking I'd use a Jeep for biking, canoeing, camping and going to the snow but will probably not, if ever, use 4X4 much. Oh yeah and to pose. Last edited by cantdrv55; 07-05-2005 at 09:59 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Having four wheeled a number of Toyota pickups over the years in the company of various Jeeps, one thing that seems to be a recurring theme is that Jeeps don't have nearly the "design margin" that Toyotas have. In other words, modify them somewhat and you're going to find the weakest link in a hurry.
They are great off road vehicles, though. If you keep it relatively stock (and only go on trails that a relatively stock Jeep can traverse) I think you'd be happy with one. The Landcruiser suggestion is a good one (especially an FJ40), but they have gotten waaay too expensive, IMO. Mike
__________________
Mike 1976 Euro 911 3.2 w/10.3 compression & SSIs 22/29 torsions, 22/22 adjustable sways, Carrera brakes |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
naw, that is just like driving around for weeks, with the autoX number still shoepolished on the windows. but he aint posing. he is using the vehicle, and that gets some respect. leaving all that mess on a truck just makes for more work later. and it isnt nice driving on the roads periodically dropping dirt clods to fly up on the nice porsche following you.
bottomline, a jeep isnt the best vehicle if you need to move people and cargo. it may be one of the worst.
__________________
poof! gone |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,199
|
I've had a '91 Wrangler for about 11 years. Have had two CJ's (a 5 and a 7) previous to that.
PROS: You can go almost anywhere. The short wheel base, tight turning radius also makes city driving a breeze as you fit almost anywhere. Very capable 4WD system. Good amount of HP and Torque for size/weight of vehicle. Pre-'97 models are very utilitarian, pull the carpet, pull the drain plugs and hose down the inside. 4.0L models from '91-'95 are MUCH better than the 4.2L carburated engines used from '87-'90. Top down driving with no doors is the best. You have a targa, so you're used to the wind noise. Abundance of aftermarket accesories / reasonable cost of parts CONS: No security with the soft top. Leave something in it, tops gets cut or unzipped and your stuff is gone. Short wheelbase is reason for ride quality, some say the '97 and newer are better due to coil springs. I prefer my Old Man Emu set-up. Moderate gas mileage. 4.0 with less than aggressive driving can get up to about 18mpg. Lack of cargo space. Hitch rack or cargo rack on top will help, but not eliminate the problem. Straight 6 is very strong and reliable. (That being said I replaced the trans in mine at 90K due to bad synchros and then spun a main bearing at 118K, still wouldn't trade it for anything. I used and abused this thing and take the heat for the failures) '97 and newer models have become more 'cushy' some love it, some hate it. Drive a couple, top up and top down. You'll know within minutes if it is for you or not..... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
|
Great info deanp, thanks.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,199
|
No problem. If you have any more specific questions about a particular vehicle just ask. I know mine pretty much inside and out and they didn't change much mechanically over a period of several years.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,230
|
I don't know if you're shopping new or used, but I just read somewhere that the Wrangler is due for what sounded like a major upgrade. There must be a Jeep dot com that would know?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,951
|
Yeah, I was looking around for a Jeep forum but haven't come across a good one yet.
|
||
![]() |
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,594
|
Try Jeepsunlimited.com
My wife's driver is a 1998 TJ Wrangler w/33" tires. She loves it. Rarely drives the 912 I bought her. Its off-road capability is amazing. It's on-road manners are less than Porsche-like. Ya gotta drive it with the top & doors off. On dirt. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Here's a site with forums for just about any vehicle: http://www.automotiveforums.com/message_board/
Wrangler: http://www.automotiveforums.com/f250-wrangler.html
__________________
Warren & Ron, may you rest in Peace. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 323
|
IMHO, You should decide what your going to use it for? I have a Grand Cherokee on long arms and two Toyota FJ 40's, The first thing to go will be the Dana 35 rear axle if your running more than 32 inch tires, a great upgrade is the Ford 8.8, same width and with minor modification will bolt right up, If your looking to do some trail rides the Jeep will be fine, if your looking to do the Rubicon you may want to look at the Toyota.
__________________
78 SC all over the shop 74 911 Stock |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,199
|
Have to agree there, on-road manners are certainly not Porsche-like. However with the right group of people it is equally 'family' like and there is a bond so to speak. And yes, there is a Jeep wave hierarchy.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There is nothing to be learned from the second kick of a mule" - Mark Twain |
||
![]() |
|