Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Revising History (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/230469-revising-history.html)

fintstone 07-10-2005 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
*******.
LOL!!!That is funny coming from a grown man who specializes in little girl clothing and accessories. I guess if it makes you feel better about your inadequacies.....but don't expect me to lower myself to that level.

Shaun @ Tru6 07-10-2005 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stuartj
Play the ball, not the man.
He makes up the rules as he goes along in his very own dilusional world, there's no playing with him. Give him a fact and he ignores or refutes actual, irrefutable facts. Coupled with a very real and demonstrated ignorance about the world. How many autobiographies are actually written by the subject? Very few. There are almost always 2 names to any given autobiography.

fintstone 07-10-2005 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stuartj
Play the ball, not the man.
Another good one Victor! I am impressed....But of course he knows that it will not work...when one has no game...one is forced to take more desperate measures.....and sometimes they soil themselves.

Shaun @ Tru6 07-10-2005 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
LOL!!!That is funny coming from a grown man who specializes in little girl clothing and accessories. I guess if it makes you feel better about your inadequacies.....but don't expect me to lower myself to that level.
*******!

fintstone 07-10-2005 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
He makes up the rules as he goes along in his very own dilusional world, there's no playing with him. Give him a fact and he ignores or refutes actual, irrefutable facts. Coupled with a very real and demonstrated ignorance about the world. How many autobiographies are actually written by the subject? Very few. There are almost always 2 names to any given autobiography.
Lefties question things as simple as jobs I have had, where I live, countries I have visited, what my education is, If I am a Thalidomide baby, etc... every day here and expect me to prove otherwise...yet they expect me to take their word that they have a secret friend...that they cannot divulge...who has exclusive intimate knowledge of the Ollie North and the writing of his autobiography.....just trust me LOL.....HaHaHa

fintstone 07-10-2005 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
*******!
LOL, LOL, LOL

Shaun @ Tru6 07-10-2005 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
Lefties question things as simple as jobs I have had, where I live, countries I have visited, what my education is, If I am a Thalidomide baby, etc... every day here and expect me to prove otherwise...yet they expect me to take their word that they have a secret friend...that they cannot divulge...who has exclusive intimate knowledge of the Ollie North and the writing of his autobiography.....just trust me LOL.....HaHaHa
No one here questions your education! It is readily apparent.

stuartj 07-10-2005 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
Lefties question things as simple as jobs I have had, where I live, countries I have visited, what my education is, If I am a Thalidomide baby, etc... every day here and expect me to prove otherwise...yet they expect me to take their word that they have a secret friend...that they cannot divulge...who has exclusive intimate knowledge of the Ollie North and the writing of his autobiography.....just trust me LOL.....HaHaHa
If its any consolation fint, my opinion of you is based entirely on your comprehensive grasp of the facts and your inciteful analysis of same.

Shaun @ Tru6 07-10-2005 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stuartj
If its any consolation fint, my opinion of you is based entirely on your comprehensive grasp of the facts and your inciteful analysis of same.
he's not going to get that.

fintstone 07-10-2005 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stuartj
If its any consolation fint, my opinion of you is based entirely on your comprehensive grasp of the facts and your inciteful analysis of same.
Another zinger! You acquit yourself well tonight Stu....but I am not playing....Your buddy's Thalidomide remark sorta put a damper on things. Perhaps he is too young to remember or too callous to care.

stuartj 07-10-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
but I am not playing....Your buddy's Thalidomide remark sorta put a damper on things.

"In another PP thread today, it was stated by a liberal that the media were not part of the "far left." The implication is that they are somehow close to moderate."

Regarding your opening contention. I put to you that there is no "far left" in the United States. None.

What passes for the "left" in the US only looks that way because of the rabidness of the Right. Most of the "leftist" voices I read here are very quite centrist. "Liberal media" like CNN and ABC just looks like more American propoganda from outside .....Hard to tell from FOX really.

fintstone 07-10-2005 09:11 PM

I guess it would depend on how you define left or right. I do not use a multinational scale. I look at what I consider mainstream in middle USA as centrist or moderate....far left of that is "far left." Far right of that is "far right."
By the way, I really enjoyed a recent visit to northern part of your country. It was quite beautiful.

CamB 07-10-2005 09:38 PM

Yeah, but Fint isn't that a flawed way of doing it?

By that measure, you would have been on the left in Nazi Germany (I don't think I've ever brought up Nazi in an argument, and I think I might just have lost).

Or, the "liberal" media would be considered ultra conservative if you lived in the Netherlands.

It is what it is - somewhere in the middle (they actually have to have a different version of CNN internationally as the US version is a bit too right).

fintstone 07-10-2005 10:00 PM

I guess that is just the libertarian in me....I really don't care much about the politics elsewhere....I have enough problems figuring them out here with all the liberal disinformation.

CamB 07-10-2005 10:11 PM

How do you know it isn't conservative disinformation making you believe that the liberal information is, in fact, disinformation?

And I'm being serious, despite the doubletalk. The media is powerful - we would both acknowledge that - and you know you watch Fox (considered worthy of a documentary by liberals on its biasedness, although this raises the question as to whether a documentary on the disinformation of Fox is in fact disinformation itself).

Anyway, where was I going with this? Oh yeah - you still can't consider the media to have a liberal bias just because it is more liberal than you.

Moneyguy1 07-10-2005 10:16 PM

fint: We ALL would like to think of ourselves as moderate and in the majority. Fact of the matter is that some of us (me included) are not.

Measuring anything in personal terms is misleading at best and delusional at worst. If you ARE right of center, be proud of it and admit it. It is not a sin.

fintstone 07-10-2005 10:20 PM

I will consider it conservative disinformation when I see beyond a doubt that they are lying...as I have seen time again with the democrats. Once again, I consider it far left based on my observation of what constitutes the mainstream of the USA. Although I am widely traveled, i do not consider myself an expert on politics elsewhere. Apparently my observations are more accurate than most liberals who post here who were so sure that Kerry would win by a landslide that they were trying to take bets right before the election.

CamB 07-10-2005 10:24 PM

Well, they didn't have their fingers on the electoral pulse, because it was always gonna be close.

You don't really have to be well travelled. All you need to know is that every english speaking country, plus all of Western Europe, has a government to the left of yours.

(edit) Actually, you've raised an interesting point - you refer to seeing conservative media "lying".

The reason that its interesting is because of the constant battle to redefine the truth. Two items could have the same degree of truth to them but come out of the media washer entirely differently.

Fox has a well known reputation for dressing up Administration talking points as news (and hence "truth"). Does truth need the other side of "fair and balanced"?

fintstone 07-10-2005 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
fint: We ALL would like to think of ourselves as moderate and in the majority. Fact of the matter is that some of us (me included) are not.

Measuring anything in personal terms is misleading at best and delusional at worst. If you ARE right of center, be proud of it and admit it. It is not a sin.

While I would agree that I am slightly right of the exact center.....I feel that I am close enough to the center on most issues that I would certainly be grouped as a moderate if the categories were Far Left, Moderate, and Far Right. It just depends on how many times you divide the pie....but such labels mean nothing anyways.

fintstone 07-10-2005 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamB
Well, they didn't have their fingers on the electoral pulse, because it was always gonna be close.

You don't really have to be well travelled. All you need to know is that every english speaking country, plus all of Western Europe, has a government to the left of yours.

Well, I imagine they will learn the folly of their ways eventually.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.