Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   The real Katrina timeline (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/239912-real-katrina-timeline.html)

MichiganMat 09-09-2005 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 928ram

As for the "staged photo op", it's an out and out lie, you'll have to trust me.

OHHH, OK. Obviously, if you say it is then it must be so. And let me guess: the "town hall" meetings that GW holds once a month are all legit too, right? Just regular folks from around town I bet. And the fake news reports that came out, and the paid off news anchors, they were legit too.

I get it now, how silly of me.

Shaun @ Tru6 09-09-2005 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MichiganMat
OHHH, OK. Obviously, if you say it is then it must be so. And let me guess: the "town hall" meetings that GW holds once a month are all legit too, right? Just regular folks from around town I bet. And the fake news reports that came out, and the paid off news anchors, they were legit too.

I get it now, how silly of me.

While I don't want to believe in a staged photo op, I've got to admit that the admin has quite a lot of experience (as listed above) in this sort of thing.

Those town hall meetings are a national disgrace and really gall me.

techweenie 09-09-2005 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 928ram
Tech, did you read what I posted? Those are 2 examples, how about Sen Landrieu's rant about levee work being a "photo op"? I've seen hundreds of live shots of the work being done on the levee; sometimes there was a Cat pushing dirt, sometimes there were helicopters dropping sandbags, sometimes nothing was moving at all. You don't think it was a stretch for her to call it a "photo op"?

USS Bataan; big ship, all navigational aids were destroyed by the storm, debris in the water and in the shipping channels. No where did I say that it wasn't underutilized, in fact, with it's capabilities I doubt all it's abilities could be fully utilized in any situation. The ship simple couldn't get in close enough to make it a viable hospital, so instead doctors & equip were placed on the ground where they could do help in a more timely manner (along with other of the ship's personel and capabilities) and the ship itself was move to where it could be more fully used (remember NO wasn't the only area hit). Thus, imlying that they "didn't" use it in NO is a bit dishonest when they "couldn't".

As for the "staged photo op", it's an out and out lie, you'll have to trust me.

Like I stated before, if you want to put out a piece and add some slant to it, fine, but there comes a point where the slant becomes untruth and call the credibility of the whole doc into question. At least for me.

First, thank you for expanding your answers. I really appreciate a sincire dialog (it's painfully rare here).

Sorry, I did not see a rant about a levee 'photo op.' Not sure who was involved.

My understanding of the Bataan situation was that they were running helicopter rescues but not bringing rescuees to the ship. I find that puzzling. Unless it was fear of bringing a terrorist on board, why would they leave all those doctors and beds idle?

In regard to the president, if you'll recall, the initial 'flyover' last Wednesday was explained as 'an on site visit would be too disruptive.' And there's some truth in that, in that no aircraft can be anywhere near the president for the period of time he's visiting.

Similarly, in the Coast Guard photo op, crew was gathered (see them in the background) and helos were in their hangars. Were they there for maintenance? Refueling? Could those activities proceed while W was there? I think not. You obviously believe otherwise.

Yesterday's firefighter photo op was staged with Atlanta firemen who were flown to the photo op site before being allowed to do actual work -- at another site. That 'rolled up sleeves' shot is just flat embarrassing. Did he bring his chainsaw? Was he going to clear brush?

So my problem with all this is that W did the right thing on Wednesday, and has done the wrong thing by showing up and stopping rescue efforts ever since. How should/could he have done better? By setting up an actual command post at the periphery of the damage and 'photo op-ing' in conversation with some of the people in charge of the 14 government agencies that are tripping all over each other.

legion 09-09-2005 08:13 AM

Name a president in the last 50 years who did town hall meetings differently?

techweenie 09-09-2005 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by legion
Name a president in the last 50 years who did town hall meetings differently?
Every one of them.

Shaun @ Tru6 09-09-2005 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 928ram
Sure Shaun,

Take the USS Bataan as a half-truth. "Virtually Unused" cries that link, yet the article it links to says "underused" True? Sort of, they suggest that the ship "wasn't" fully utilized when in fact it "couldn't" be fully utilized in the NO area thus it was move off MS where it could (and did/does) use more of it's full capabilities. The article also fell short of reporting all of the missions that the Bataan did do in the NO area as well as leaving enough info out to suggest the hospital capabilities were being used as a warehouse when in fact mostly devoid of aircraft, the hanger deck was indeed being used to transfer supplies to the needy.

Lies? Let me cut and paste this:

10 AM — PRESIDENT BUSH STAGES PHOTO-OP “BRIEFING”: Coast Guard helicopters and crew diverted to act as backdrop for President Bush’s photo-op.

Simply untrue.

Lacks credibility. If they want to publish something and add a slant to it, fine, but if your going to lie at all the whole article is in question including any parts that are true.


Thanks for this description of the Bataan, much appreciated.

So given Mark's original post here, seems like a lot of lies on all sides going around on this subject.

techweenie 09-09-2005 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
Thanks for this description of the Bataan, much appreciated.

So given Mark's original post here, seems like a lot of lies on all sides going around on this subject.

I think we've seen an interesting phenomenon this past week. A press corps completely dependent upon pre-packaged and stage-managed information has had to turn into a group of journalists.

And as such, they've given us bits and pieces of the story, but left out key underpinnings, allowing false accusations to fill the void. It appears Lt. Gen. Honore arrived in NO on Thursday, Sept 1. He seems a pretty capable, hands-on guy, but it took him a couple of days to wrestle everyone into line. DoD reports he began gathering his command together on Friday the 26th.

So I suppose the question is, who was in charge from Sunday the 28th through Wednesday the 31st? We know Gov. Blanco requested FEMA take the lead in coordinating agencies on Saturday the 27th, because the white house acknowledged and agreed with the request. So what happened next?

928ram 09-09-2005 10:26 AM

Tech, on not using the beds/facilities aboard the Bataan; all channel markers were destroyed and bouys were sunk or displaced, it's 90 miles from NO to the Gulf and shipping channels. I'd have to put a guess on it as I couldn't find any location data, but that size ship coudn't have been any closer than 150 mile, probably more. Even at 90 miles (slightly shorter as the crow flies) the air time would have cut seriously into numbers that could be transported and treated.

Coast Guard pic was at ATC (Aviation Training Center) Mobile, those helos were "in the shop" so to speak. And you'll notice the flight suits on some of those guys; these guys have to follow down time and maintanance schedules too. Yes, I do have an "in" at the Coast Guard, and the fellows standing around were mostly off-duty ( some obviously on-duty fixing the helos) and invited to show up in uniform for Bush's arrival-strictly optional.

Firefighters photo-op, I don't know, that's just what politicians do. I wouldn't dissmiss that they were given the option to pose with the Prez and accepted, look how many Coasties showed up after working back to back 12-18 hr days.

Guys, I really don't know what to think with all this information flying around. You can't let yourself believe one report because it's what you want to hear, nor can you dismiss another because it isn't. I try to remember back to what was being broadcast as the storm happened (on generator and local news) and the 1st day that followed as the the info right then seemed more pure in a news sense.

While we didn't get hit so hard here, Mobile and Mobile county got slammed, esp. by the storm surge. The recovery hasn't been flawless here, but it's been very smooth and ahead of schedule in many cases. This is in part because of the lesser impact but also because the authorities and govt. here take these things very seriously and work together as one unit.

When I look at the way things have gone in NO, I wonder if "blame" is the wrong word, but instead accept that fact that people sometimes fall short or fail even when giving all they can. After every hurricane someone always says "you can never be fully prepared". Maybe we've done the best we can do this time. I for one don't know, I guess we'll have to wait for the investigation(s) results.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.