Besides...the blond in the story was "hot"...so it couldn't have been CC...now could it?...Unless, of course, one was whipped?

Or were they? Hmmm...

Awwww right: I'm extending the first olive branch. I've gotten over my - ummm - menopause about this. So how about everyone else get over theirs?

The shelf life of this argument is like sushi - do not digest after a day's display.

So...how 'bout it? I'm getting really bored here...

I have a question for you Skip. Even if someone had referred to a female poster here as a dumb blonde...In some cases, it might just be a accurate description. But, how would that :
1. Be sexual?
Or
2. Be worse than these remarks? I don’t remember anyone’s panties in a wad about these remarks:
------------------------------------------------
quote:

I love how every time you respond, it includes 'straight from Rush' neo con attack speak. Its of course meaningless. But for drones such as yourself, it has a nice absolute tone that makes you think you are making a point. Your not.

I am tired of being nice to, and attempting argue with you in a logical manner. If you seriously believe the stuff that you write, then either your an idiot, or one scary ass blindly hateful person. In either instance, I am done with it. So the next time you write, "These liberal personal attacks.....", well yes, I will be attacking you personally. Because your a bad person.

quote:

LOL. Funny, I was just out in working in the yard, when it crossed my mind that flinstone is actually some Boston gay liberal just egging us on. It seems more plausible than the existance of such a cartoonish neo con lunatic. Its almost like the Simpsons writers sat down and created a composite character with every aspect of a Karl Rove wet dream included, and gave the character the name 'flintstone'.

quote:

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
LOL Flint, your moronism knows no bounds, and it's across so many levels. Which medical textbooks are you in again? Are you really a thalidomide baby?

Originally posted by Shaun 84 Targa
*******.

quote:

Originally posted by speeder
The quotation marks indicate that I was quoting HIM, you assclown. Jesus.

quote:

Originally posted by speeder
You get the assclown award for today, all of the rest of you guys can hang it up until tomorrow.

------------------------------------------------

fint- You've not understood I word I've said.

But, to answer your questions...

#1. It isn't. The "dumb blond story" (later to be referred as "DBS") was in no way sexual in nature.
#2. It isn't. It is in no way worse than what you quoted, or worse than VOLUMES of other posts I've seen on this board.

My panties got in a wad because she asked for it to stop. And it didn't. (edit- not the "DBS", but all the sex crap)
And, I would do the same for you (though I doubt you'd need or appreciate it).

- Skip

Switzerland is lovely this time of year...ahhhhhhhhhh

http://switzerland.isyours.com/image...-berg-cows.jpg

okay seriously :cool: not to beat a dead cow, but fints point w.... oh crap, now someones going to say I called troll-chit a COW.

On the contrary, I understand far too well what you said. It just doesn't add up. Once again...If that was the case, please explain....why she did not attack the fellows who made the sexual remark (nor did you)...but rather attacked those who did not. In fact, you posted that the only post you remembered was mine (and even then your memory was incorrect). Clearly the part that she found offensive was the attack on the content of her inane posts, which are fair game. Not the innuendo...which she provoked with her own comments. In fact, even as she called out for it to stop...She continued to make insulting remarks to those who were only commenting on what was fair game. As long as she did so...she apparently wanted it to continue. She was acting like a child who wanted the parents to break up the fight..but every time you turned to walk away she would smack you again....and cry for help.
Her posts were lame and I felt that she was let off too easy considering their obvious lack of merit. Then when challenged...she played the "oh, help me...I am the poor female that these guys are attacking" card.
I am not saying that I was not hard on her...only that it was no tougher than i would be on anyone else....and I usually pull my punches. Note..when Nostatic initially "cleaned up" the board after the posts...he,,,very fairly considering we are often at odds...did not erase a single one of mine. What does that tell you?

Now I am not reconsidering anything I said or running from it...or condemning what others said...Even though I personally would not use the same words. As far as I am concerned, when a person constantly makes sex talk..they should not be suprised that others do also. All I would like...is that you and others who choose to quote me...do so accurately.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
[B]Switzerland is lovely this time of year...ahhhhhhhhhh

Those cows just told me that you were using sexual innuendo about them in you post...and they want you to stop now.....before they strap one on and come looking for your sweet cheeks...MOOOOO!

Actually, not the first. I distinctly remember one member in particular who tried repeatedly (as only he can) to get everyone to "... all just drop the whole CC issue. No more accusations. No more defenses. We all just agree to let it die the death it deserves."

hmmmm, who could it have been? I'm quite sure he was devilishly handsome with a keen intellect.
:D

- Skip

a goat 'll do that.



:cool:

Oh, I know, I know . . the same guy who started this c-c-continuation thread?


. . .what do I win? :cool:

It is easy to hold out an olive branch when you are not the one getting kicked in the shins. It is more difficult to keep from making unfounded accusations......followed by condescension when confronted with it.....apparently

So you were not referring to CC with the "dumb blond who looks good at closing time, etc...", remark??

Liar.

What I know about being a man is telling the truth, standing behind my statements, and admitting when I am wrong and apologizing. Including, (but not limited to), on this BBS. I really doubt that you were even offended by any of the posts that you just quoted, I think that you save them on your computer somewhere to display w/ some false aggrievment. You are an absolutely dishonest debater IMO, you remind me of the Rush Limbaugh instance of calling Chelsea Clinton "the WH dog" and then pretending that it was a mistake instead of owning up to it.

What is it w/ some right-wingers and disrespecting women? And not all RWers, witness Mulholland. BTW, he is an absolute gentleman in the real world, and does not ask women what their politics are beforehand. Some of you guys need etiquette lessons.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fintstone
[B] I think you are confusing me with a Washington farm animal f#$$%^+ liberal...or G9Shaun :D

Yodel, yodel, yodel...Yo-dee-lay-eeeee-mooooo

http://switzerland.isyours.com/image...-pasturing.jpg

I did not call CC a dumb blond. Whether she is or not is certainly debatable. You, however, have never hesitated to take the low road on this forum or call another poster the first foul name that popped into your head when they outwitted you...which is most of the time. As always, you and the truth are complete strangers.

You've got to admit... SmileWavy

Yeah...I always thought that was Hillary.

Skip - it's a dying attempt. Fact is, CC can defend herself - not that she needs any. She knows the mettle of the men who attacked her two nights ago, and probably isn't all too concerned with it at this moment. After all, she did win: the thread was pulled, though there were some who had enough foresight to copy it for whatever reason before it was cleansed and finally erased. But yes, you were first to call a stop to the abuse, and when your post, I thought 'Now that's one helluva stand-up guy.'

Personally, I've gotten into it with CC myself, and she fights very fair with many facts to back it up - not cut and paste, or disingenuous commentary filled with sarcasm.

You and I acted meritoriously, I believe. However, I don't think we'll get anywhere with those connected to that thread who felt and continue to feel a need to instigate, attack, and truly add nothing but their own misogynistic and masculine inadequacies to a person who in the first place never set out to dishonor what little honor the attackers had from the outset.

But, of course, what does any of this mean when it is written from one guy who is an "ass clown" to another guy who is "whipped." :D