"...(at least according to recent al qaeda interceptions)..."

Are you recieving these with your tin foil hat?

Zawahiri to Zarqawi (intercept October 14th):

"The brothers informed me that you suggested to them sending some assistance. Our situation since Abu al-Faraj is good by the grace of God, but many of the lines have been cut off. Because of this, we need a payment while new lines are being opened. So, if you're capable of sending a payment of approximately one hundred thousand, we'll be very grateful to you."

*snip*

""However, despite all of this, I say to you: that we are in a battle, and that more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media .... And we can kill the captives by bullet. That would achieve that which is sought after without exposing ourselves to the questions and answering to doubts. We don't need this."


Thank Allah the Islamofascists have American media.

You mean we can intercept these transmissions and not triangulate the positions?

Did you make those up?

Is ignorance truly bliss?...I suppose it is.

CNN - Zarqawi/Zawahiri intercept

Thanks for link. So why can't we find these guys if we can intercept letters?

Obviously pure unadulterated incompetence...We are talking Bush here.

Okay if you say so.

But it seems to me, this might have been by accident and not an intended intercept. Why else would we not have been able to follow the post?

So to summarise your argument, it is the evil liberal press' fault for concentrating on the sensationalist story at the expense of the other stuff, not the Republican's fault for focussing on that story at the expense of the other stuff?

Can't you just introduce a little objectivity into your life?

(edit) Oh yeah, "Did I mention burn alive the Christians in Waco?" - so Branch Davidians are ok, but Catholics aren't. :rolleyes: