|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 285
|
OT: 911 vs. 944
The Canidates:
-1973 911S. -1983 944. I take it I am more manuevarble (Sp?) but slower 0-60 and 1/4 mile times...? Does anyone know how it'd be from 40-100 or 60-100? |
||
09-08-2001, 03:36 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: independence ks
Posts: 219
|
I got to drive a 911 once, and it felt like it was slower at lower rpms and lower speeds. I had to rev it higher to get the power to kick in. and the throttle response was a bit slower, in fact i killed the engine twice before i got it out of the parking lot. But I've heard that they are really in their element at higher speeds and will definitely out perform our cars in that respect. Like on a race track.
|
||
|
09-08-2001, 03:41 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 82
|
I think I'd give it to the 911 on both counts.. 0-60 in the mid 6s, 190hp, 159lb-ft, 2300lbs.
------------------ '86 951 Graphite Metallic/Tan |
||
|
09-08-2001, 03:52 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 1,132
|
it wouldn't even be close
------------------ Erick 86 951 http://www.pelicanparts.com/cgi-bin/pmpre/pm.cgi?action=display&login=aka_951 |
||
|
09-08-2001, 07:36 PM
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 285
|
Hrm, if I get that rimmer, I'll have to run it at 7PSi and check out my 1/4 times ;D
|
||
|
09-08-2001, 07:50 PM
|
|
