Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Who Should The US Invade next? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/266575-who-should-us-invade-next.html)

dd74 02-15-2006 10:31 AM

Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Obviously, by hint of the persons interviewed, the U.S. should invade the U.S. public school system. :rolleyes:

tabs 02-15-2006 10:35 AM

Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dd74
Obviously, by hint of the persons interviewed, the U.S. should invade the U.S. public school system. :rolleyes:
And U think Iraq is a Mess!!!Just wait till you hit the Schools..

scottmandue 02-15-2006 11:32 AM

sarcasm on

He11 yeah, bomb America... then we can spend billions rebuilding our economy and restoring democracy!

Porsche-O-Phile 02-15-2006 12:05 PM

California could easily survive without the rest of the U.S.

The rest of the U.S. probably wouldn't do so well without CA. ;)



I do like the idea of attacking D.C. though. Without warning. With nukes. Actually we should use neutron bombs (kill all the people, leave the buildings). I've always liked D.C. architecture for some reason. . .

johncj8989 02-15-2006 12:13 PM

Invade Detroit and take over the Big Three.

Deschodt 02-15-2006 12:48 PM

I vote Venezuela... They actually might be grateful to be rid of Chavez, they got oil, and are a lot closer to the conUS. ;-)

fastpat 02-15-2006 12:51 PM

Re: Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by tabs
And U think Iraq is a Mess!!!Just wait till you hit the Schools..
Not schools, government schools which are little more than little sociofascist propaganda camps.

Mulhollanddose 02-15-2006 01:19 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by fastpat
Not schools, government schools which are little more than little sociofascist propaganda camps.
There is hope for you...just when I write you off for aiding and abetting the liberal enemy.

stuartj 02-15-2006 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevepaa
They also split Australia into North and South Korea.
All your base are belong to us.

Those arent pollsters. That is "The Chaser", or CNNNN, Australian political satirists. Read the tickers running across the screen. They do a nice job on Fox.

Chaser are in the news at the moment becasue they submitted this cartoon by cartoonist Michael Luenig to the Iranian newspaper running a competition to test Western free speech. The cartoon has been withdrawn, aplogies issued etc.

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/sto...60502_s5f1.gif

They are indeed very naughty boys. From the real CNN today:

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/13/cartoons.australia.ap/

fastpat 02-15-2006 02:05 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
There is hope for you...just when I write you off for aiding and abetting the liberal enemy.
Mul-berry, how many times must I remind you that as a neo-con YOU are a liberal.

You may not be a Kennedy or Kerry liberal, but you're definitely a Bush and McCain liberal.

To the core.

Mulhollanddose 02-15-2006 02:21 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by fastpat
Mul-berry, how many times must I remind you that as a neo-con YOU are a liberal.

You may not be a Kennedy or Kerry liberal, but you're definitely a Bush and McCain liberal.

To the core.

Somewhat of an overstatement methinks, especially given Bush is to the right of McCain and I decidedly to the right of Bush policy coddling the communists...which doesn't negate the fact that you do nothing other than assure the most left candidate gets elected. In your current manifestation you have aligned yourself with the enemy of your enemy, who is not your friend.

fastpat 02-15-2006 02:29 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who Should The US Invade next?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Somewhat of an overstatement methinks, especially given Bush is to the right of McCain and I decidedly to the right of Bush policy coddling the communists...which doesn't negate the fact that you do nothing other than assure the most left candidate gets elected. In your current manifestation you have aligned yourself with the enemy of your enemy, who is not your friend.
I will not abandon a position because others take it up. Opposing the Bush'ists is not a liberal position, because Bush is a liberal.

Opposition to Bush is a libertarian and conservative position. If Bush's activities elect a Democrat, it's hardly rational to lay that at the feet of those that told him not to go where he went.

nostatic 02-15-2006 02:32 PM

Costa Rica - good surf.

Maybe Bali, but too many terrorists. Fiji instead.

fastpat 02-15-2006 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nostatic
Costa Rica - good surf.

Maybe Bali, but too many terrorists. Fiji instead.

Enjoy, send us an electronic post card.

911pcars 02-16-2006 12:48 AM

Not sure you guys realize it, but you've been discussing bombing and invading countries and US cities. That's terrorist talk in many govt. bureaucrats' minds.

I bet the NSA has a bead (or a record) on every one of your email messages, phones too. BTW, let us know if you get audited by the IRS next year. And don't forget to send the forum a technical inquiry from one of those facilities in Siberia. We'll miss you, but only for awhile, or someone will assume your user name and avatar and no one will be the wiser.

:)
Sherwood

ckissick 02-16-2006 07:49 AM

The interviewer appeared to have an Aussie accent, and aside from the Sri Lanka girl, everyone put their flag on Australia, whether they thought it was Iran, France, or Korea. Staged? People can't be that stupid. Can they?

techweenie 02-16-2006 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ckissick
The interviewer appeared to have an Aussie accent, and aside from the Sri Lanka girl, everyone put their flag on Australia, whether they thought it was Iran, France, or Korea. Staged? People can't be that stupid. Can they?
I believe the map had Australia labeled variously as Iran and Korea in some of those takes. And yes, people can be that stupid. Look who's in the white house.

rcecale 02-16-2006 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by techweenie
And yes, people can be that stupid. Look who's in the white house.
He beat YOU guys.....TWICE!!! :eek:

Randy ;)

Mulhollanddose 02-16-2006 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rcecale
He beat YOU guys.....TWICE!!! :eek:

Randy ;)

That is with a hostile press working against him and for Gore and Kerry...Who is the monkey's uncle?

BTW...Kerry and Gore were frauds and less intelligent based on collegiate testing.

stuartj 02-16-2006 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rcecale
He beat YOU guys.....TWICE!!! :eek:

Randy ;)

I believe that is techweenies point, rcecale.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.