widgeon13 |
04-15-2006 01:48 PM |
A few more thoughts:
The majority of the windfall came during increasing oil prices, we're being led to believe that is the result of good business decisions. A good amount of that money comes from stock options exercised while the stock price was going up, why was the price going up, because we were paying higher fuel prices.
Raymond is not the only benefactor, many other executives have similar benefits although not as lucrative but still worth millions. And it's not restricted to the oil companies only. Multiply this by 400 - 500 and you have the kind of benefit packages that are prevalent in most public corporations. Not all being delivered on an annual basis but the potential is there for the payout in any given year.
I find it difficult to understand how it is ethical to pay somone more money than they might spend in 50 lifetimes and think that this is rational thinking.
Corporations will justify this as necessary to get and retain quality executives, that is simply the party line in the "old boys club". if you read any company proxy statements you will see that all these folks are scratching each others backs when they put together these packages. Shareholders will challenge these pay scales but the corporate boards most always vote them down for the above reason.
The sad thing is that it gets increasingly worse every year.
I agree with on ramp, it is a form of terrroism and we have no defense against this enemy.
|