Consumer Confidence ignored by the left

[Mulhollanddose]

Consumer confidence in the economy's prospects improved in early April even as gasoline prices and borrowing costs marched higher.

The RBC CASH (Consumer Attitudes and Spending by Household) Index, based on results from the international polling firm Ipsos, showed confidence at 89.4 in early April, up from March's 86.2. The new reading also was better than a year ago, when consumer confidence clocked in at 84.5.

"It's a positive sign," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

Overall, consumers are in a generally good frame of mind, economists said.

"I think we can take heart in the fact that even with all the worries _ about energy prices, higher interest rates and a slowing housing market _ confidence moved higher," said economist Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.

Analysts track consumer confidence for clues about consumers' willingness to spend, an important force shaping the country's economic health.



AssociatedProgressives

[chibone_914]

Of course they want to avoid the positive news like the plague. It's things like this that is counter-productive to their cause. (futile at best)

[TheMentat]

I'm not sure that consumer confidence is being deliberately ignored by the left. Perhaps the left just doesn't see that consumer confidence is an excellent indicator of long term economic health, especially when accompanied by a negative personal savings rate.

Its kinda like the way the left (and many other rational conservatives) just doesn't see all the long term benefits of the current administration's massive deficit spending.

[Jamie79SC]

I don't know why the consumer confidence index is reported at all, good or bad.

edited for typo

[Jim Richards]

not to worry mul, you're ignored by the left, center and all but the extreme right.

[hunter914]

Nul, why do you rely on the Royal Bank of Canada's CASH index? Is this part of your Commie Socialist Agenda?

Anyway, since you do, thought you'd like to see the first page of the survey analytics. You can download the survey here:

http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/rbc-cash-index.html

see right column, Topline results. Anyway, here's the first page. Please tell us all what you think of these numbers:

[Mulhollanddose]

Why when Bush inherits Clinton's recession, it is Bush's recession, but when Bush's policies obviously turn around an economic disaster it is diminished and marginalized?

What happened to the Clinton years, when nothing but the economy mattered?...No crime or level of Presidential corruption was an issue, it was "the economy stupid."

[deathpunk dan]

Mul, you are closer to Tokyo Rose than a real patriot. I used to want to find you and pummel your sorry ass, now I just laugh at you. You are a sad person.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by hunter914
see right column, Topline results. Anyway, here's the first page. Please tell us all what you think of these numbers:

I think that the incessant economic negativity from the media is, by design, making people feel insecure about the economic future. However, the people are behaving like the economy is good and their actions are the real indicators of their confidence. The disconnect of actions from sentiments can only be explained by media bias and orchestrated intent to destroy consumer confidence.

No one of credibility would argue that the economy is smoking, however, if you consumed the news you would barely know it (FoxNews would give you a more accurate perception).

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by deathpunk dan
Mul, you are closer to Tokyo Rose than a real patriot. I used to want to find you and pummel your sorry ass, now I just laugh at you. You are a sad person.

Whenever you would like to come out to La La Land...We have great Spanish speaking ICUs.

[TheMentat]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Why when Bush inherits Clinton's recession, it is Bush's recession, but when Bush's policies obviously turn around an economic disaster it is diminished and marginalized?

What happened to the Clinton years, when nothing but the economy mattered?...No crime or level of Presidential corruption was an issue, it was "the economy stupid."

Don't be such a crybaby...

Many well regarded economists (including the Fed Chairman) warned of the "Irrational Exuberance" in equity markets during that time, and of the resulting slowdown in consumer spending that would occur should markets correct.

How did Bush's policies turn around an economic disaster?

[hunter914]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I think that the incessant economic negativity from the media is, by design, making people feel insecure about the economic future. However, the people are behaving like the economy is good and their actions are the real indicators of their confidence. The disconnect of actions from sentiments can only be explained by media bias and orchestrated intent to destroy consumer confidence.

No one of credibility would argue that the economy is smoking, however, if you consumed the news you would barely know it (FoxNews would give you a more accurate perception).

Please post 5 news stories backing up your assertion that the media portrays the economy negatively.

But you've chosen to ignore the question Traitor. Read the question, then look at the response.

go back to China, you are not wanted here.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by TheMentat
How did Bush's policies turn around an economic disaster?

Economics 101...Something the left and their media presstitutes seem to forget and shove down the memory hole at every opportunity.

[hunter914]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I think that the incessant economic negativity from the media is, by design, making people feel insecure about the economic future. However, the people are behaving like the economy is good and their actions are the real indicators of their confidence. The disconnect of actions from sentiments can only be explained by media bias and orchestrated intent to destroy consumer confidence.

No one of credibility would argue that the economy is smoking, however, if you consumed the news you would barely know it (FoxNews would give you a more accurate perception).

I thought the Right was about taking PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY???!!!

You are a master at the BLAME GAME!

Traitor.

[TheMentat]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Economics 101...Something the left and their media presstitutes seem to forget and shove down the memory hole at every opportunity.

could you be more specific? I don't think you know...

What policy of Bush's helped right the economic ship (other than lowering interest rates and hoping for the best)

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by hunter914
Please post 5 news stories backing up your assertion that the media portrays the economy negatively.

Media Research Center (MRC) examined the year 2005, specifically how ABC, NBC and CBS covered employment news. In 2005, the economy created 2 million jobs. According to the MRC, however, more than 50 percent of the stories involved job losses rather than gains.

Professor John Lott, economist and resident scholar at American Enterprise Institute, and Kevin A. Hassett, the Institute's director of economic policy studies, examined, among other things, newspapers' economic political bias as reflected by their headlines: "We found that newspaper headlines reporting economic news on unemployment, gross domestic product (GDP), retail sales, and durable goods tended to be much more frequently negative when a Republican was in the White House. And this was true even after accounting for the economic numbers on which the stories were based and how those numbers were changing over time."



HumanEvents (cause you can't trust the left media)

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by TheMentat
could you be more specific? I don't think you know...

I'll give you two hints: 1) The Democrats said that they were only for the "richest 1%", and 2) tried very very hard to stop them because they knew they would be effective.

[Mulhollanddose]

Tax cuts stimulate the economy and increase government revenues.

[hunter914]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Media Research Center (MRC) examined the year 2005, specifically how ABC, NBC and CBS covered employment news. In 2005, the economy created 2 million jobs. According to the MRC, however, more than 50 percent of the stories involved job losses rather than gains.

Professor John Lott, economist and resident scholar at American Enterprise Institute, and Kevin A. Hassett, the Institute's director of economic policy studies, examined, among other things, newspapers' economic political bias as reflected by their headlines: "We found that newspaper headlines reporting economic news on unemployment, gross domestic product (GDP), retail sales, and durable goods tended to be much more frequently negative when a Republican was in the White House. And this was true even after accounting for the economic numbers on which the stories were based and how those numbers were changing over time."

[/URL]

You post 1 right wing apologist study from a right wing apologist web site and you think that's doing a good job at responding to my request?

Our expectations are not as low as yours Nul. Do your homework boy. Come back when you have 5 stories from CNN, etc. that portray the economy negatively.

It's all about personal responsibility. Look into that some time.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by hunter914
You post 1 right wing apologist study from a right wing apologist web site and you think that's doing a good job at responding to my request?

Our expectations are not as low as yours Nul. Do your homework boy. Come back when you have 5 stories from CNN, etc. that portray the economy negatively.

It's all about personal responsibility. Look into that some time.

What a ridiculous request. Even with such a ridiculous request the right wing apologist website (infinitely more trustworthy than the falsely objective MSM) sites several examples of this bias.

All one needs do is open their eyes, or turn on the news, and the bias stinks like a freshly squashed skunk...Denying this reality only suggests an incapacity on your part to discern the obvious.