How many agree w/ sentencing??
 

She Faced 30 Years for Helping Imprisoned Client Communicate With Followers
By LARRY NEUMEISTER, AP

NEW YORK (Oct. 17) - A civil rights lawyer who has defended militant civil rights activists and anti-war radicals was sentenced Monday to nearly 2 1/2 years in prison - far less than the 30 years prosecutors wanted - for helping an imprisoned terrorist cleric communicate with his followers on the outside.

This should make for some interesting discussion?

Dr Kevorkian of the legal system.

If I were the judge she'd be making little rocks out of big rocks for about 20 years. Her partner in the crime got 24 years.

She got off easy and has the audacity to appeal it. I would love to see her serve 20-30.

Yeah, that crime is soooooo much worse than molesting a child, rape, or any of the other range of haneous crimes where the perps get off with a slap on the wrist...

No one said it was.

Ummm, posters above reference terms of 20-30 years, hence my comparison for a "slap on the wrist" for crimes which are much seemingly worse than "helping an imprisoned terrorist cleric communicate with his followers on the outside".


That's all...... Feeling cynical this morning... :)

I'm sure we all disagree with light sentences in those case as well.

Yep. :)

The judge is an a**hole.:mad: That "woman" :rolleyes:is a total piece of *****. Always has been, always will.

Hopefully her 28 months will be filled with misery and typical prison "affection" by her fellow inmates.

She happily claims she can do that time standing on her head. Lets see how she stands on her head while shes getting violated by some large bull dyke. F#*kin lowlife!

they should disbar her now too...makes that expensive law degree useless

She was disbarred yrs ago for unethical practices

oh..my bad

You guys are being way too judgemental. Did you ever consider her FEELINGS?? Maybe she was distraught by the death of her kitty cat, maybe she was secretly in love with the blind Sheikh Rachman (or however you spell his name).

Come on, where's the love for a poor misguided liberal civil rights attorney who assisted terrorists? You guys are a bunch of mouthbreathing Bushist commie bastards.

Thanks for setting us straight, Rick. I didn't know about her kitty. I feel lousy, having said the awful things I said. :cool:

Re: How many agree w/ sentencing??
 

The facts in the case are that she was to become a federal government poster child for intimidating defense attorney's by the Bush II regime. This regime will do anything, no matter how vile and illegal, to do what they want to America.

She wasn't guilty of any of the charges brought against her.

did she sent out anything from the blind shake?
I heard she just read a letter to him

the guy who got screwed in this mess was the interpreter
who didnot want to spy on the people who paid him

Ah, there is the haiku from the representative liberal who wants to defend her. It was only a matter of time.

P.S. A "blind shake" is what happens when you wack off too much. A "blind sheikh" would be what we are talking about.

If she was passing jihad instructions to abdul and mohammed, then throw away the key and get a pass to the front in the chair scheduling.
If she was following up on obtaining defense evidence/witnesses related to the case, which ANY legit attorney has a right to do, then yes, the sentancing was politically motivated and wrong.

Was the cleric a US citizen? Who were the contacts and subject?
Previous dis-barrment doesn't bode well for her, but "everything in the world is classified" doesn't give the gov. any creedence as well.
Too little info.

in my opinion the only way she should be allowed to stay out of prison is if she pays her debt to society by stepping into the now empty shoes of mother teresa. as long as you are helping the least helped people, you get to stay on the outside of the walls.don't want to do it .....serve all your time. standing on your head or otherwise.
i would also offer the same type of arrangement to the enron and worldcom guys,et.al.

more neo- & theo-conned BS

no defence IF she passed info out from the blind dude
and it had any connection to terror from me
or in anyother way helped in terrorest action
BUT news said she read a letter to him
that DIDNOT relate to terror
just an againts the rules letter
so I ask a question was there any real terror violation
or just a rules violation as that matters very much as to the sentence receved

''wanking'' has no relation to any health problems
and is a heathy thing to do unlike belife in fairytales that
forbid such actions and lie about the results