![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: berkshire uk
Posts: 1,697
|
Mileage test’s
Mileage test’s
A good reason for not speeding ! Forget speed cameras, forget getting pulled by the police. Your pocket is what you should be worried about. Now a while ago I asked some questions related to MPG and I got some different answers. Anyway I thought I’d put it to the test in as scientific way as possible. My test followed the following conditions: 1> Vehicle, Vaux Astra 1.4 Estate. 2> Engine in good condition. 3> Traffic: 90% Motorway and some mild traffic 4> Weight: Unladed, only driver 5> Tyres: checked before tests in 3 pressures i> NORMAL (29 front 26 rear) ii> PLUS (30 front 36 rear) iii> MAXIMUM (30 front 43 rear) 6> Fuel: 44 litres, measured by, allowing the tank to hit the red light then brimming to 44 litres, then running till tank hits red light 7> Speeds: i> ANY = initial test, any speed, flooring it when I could, no upper speed liomit ii> SPEED LIMIT = keeping to the speed limit of the relevant road. iii> 3000RPM= not allowing the car to rev higher than 3k rpms iv> ANY (not)= as ANY but not exceeding 70mph v> +10mph = no higher than 10 MPH higher than the speed limit of the given road. 8> Days: how many days my full tank lasted (driving days!) OK so download my spreadsheet to see the figures. http://www.playback.demon.co.uk/petrol.xls The list is sorted by best MPG to the worst. The best was “keeping to the speed limit”, the worst +10mph. Thoughts: I found that whilst the majority of people “allowed” me to keep to the speed limit there were a few who were real prats. One was a BUS driver in Greenford, who tailgated me at night with headlights on full beam. A lot of people appeared to speed up to me, then slowed down and kept a good distance and lowered there speed to mine (usually on 30mph roads). I found that generally tyre pressure did not effect MPG, though some books seemed to suggest it would. The best I got was 39MPG the worst 34MPG. (Vauxhall figures were not too far off 44MPG@56, 35MPG@75) Parkers get a lot closer to these figures though ! However the car is very under powered and I think the 1.6 version in the same body would give better MPG, especially as I do mainly motorway driving. I think the idea is that the more your foot is down more petrol you are burning, even though you may get there quicker, it still does not save you. I think a good medium is not over revving the engine and keeping to a maximum of 3000RPM. Oh yeah average costs of running the car was £5/day £25/week (petrol)
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------- The fear of God is the begining of wisdom <>< NotJustPorsche Subscribe: notjustporsche-subscribe@yahoogroups.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: dfw tx
Posts: 3,957
|
My Wife's Avalon has a control system that monitors avg Mileage, trip times, etc. Driving across Arizona, I was able to do some of those types of tests, and will confirm your findings. 80mph yielded a best of about 27mpg, while 70mph would do just over 30mpg.
I found it interesting that using the Cruise Control would give me about 1mpg improvement, even though I thought I was light on the pedal. I would think tire pressures below 24psi would cut into mileage significantly.
__________________
72 914 2056: 74 9146 2.2: 76 914 2.0 |
||
![]() |
|