Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   "Conviction" versus "Obstinance" - let's settle this. (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/339512-conviction-versus-obstinance-lets-settle.html)

Porsche-O-Phile 04-04-2007 01:42 PM

"Conviction" versus "Obstinance" - let's settle this.
 
So many of the political threads on here come down to the following series of questions:

When should a politician/elected representative take a stand against his/her constituency? Is this ever appropriate?

When an elected official does take a position on an issue that is in dramatic contrast to the opinion of his/her constituency, at what point does this stop being "conviction in one's beliefs" and start being "bull-headed obstinance"?

Finally, looking at the number of problems created/perpetuated by "career politicians" and bureaucrats, does anyone else believe that perhaps it's time to concede failure of the "representative democracy" form of government and instead try to push for a governmental model that's more directly democratic?

Discuss. Hopefully this will make for some interesting debate.

nostatic 04-04-2007 01:56 PM

you're a poopy head

scottmandue 04-04-2007 01:58 PM

Re: "Conviction" versus "Obstinance" - let's settle this.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Porsche-O-Phile

When should a politician/elected representative take a stand against his/her constituency? Is this ever appropriate?

When an elected official does take a position on an issue that is in dramatic contrast to the opinion of his/her constituency, at what point does this stop being "conviction in one's beliefs" and start being "bull-headed obstinance"?


With the general public being such a grab bag of opinions how can a representative know what their constituencies opinion is? Take California or Oregon for example, both presumed to be liberal states by many people however with lots of conservatives residents.

I suppose we could go with the idea that representative should stick to the policies they backed to get elected... but whoa... that's just crazy talk!

scottmandue 04-04-2007 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nostatic
you're a poopy head
You super double poopy head to infinity!

Porsche-O-Phile 04-04-2007 02:04 PM

Well your mother eats kitty litter!

Icemaster 04-04-2007 06:25 PM

Darts

on-ramp 04-04-2007 06:37 PM

so have we settled it yet?

Tim Hancock 04-04-2007 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Icemaster
Darts
Hopefully not as in Butt

nostatic 04-04-2007 06:46 PM

butt

Lothar 04-04-2007 07:17 PM

It is always in the best interest of career politicians to claim to have made progress with respect to various problems.

It is never in the best interest of career politicians to claim to have actually solved problems.

Solved problems provide no further opportunity to tax, regulate or legislate, the means by which politicians steal more money, power and influence from hard-working Americans.

Icemaster 04-05-2007 02:36 PM

Leave my butt out of this.

the 04-05-2007 03:02 PM

This one is easy.

If a politician takes a position in dramatic contrast to YOUR opinion, that is conviction.

If a politician takes a position in dramatic contrast to MY opinion, that is obstinance.

imcarthur 04-05-2007 03:34 PM

Finally . . .

A political thread that doesn't make me want my click back.

Oan


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.