|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,980
|
There are now 4 Starbucks in my little town of 28,000 people and ...
a 5th one on the way. The four existing are within 2 miles of each other.
The town leaders and some residents are up in arms about these "big box business" and have set limits on how many they'll allow in the future. They'd rather have vacant retail/office spaces, of which there are numerous, than have big business open up on our main street. The town I live in bills itself as a "Main Street USA" kind of town so we've had a moratorium on new residences, apartment complexes, master planned communities for decades now. Problem is, our downtown is dead when compared to similar sized communities. Great thing is we have no traffic unlike Walnut Creek, Lafayette, etc. I have no problem with Starbucks. I would've preferred a Peet's Coffee and Noah's Bagels though. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
The town where I went to college had about 7,000 non-student residents, and maybe 300 students. No chains were allowed to set up inside the a certain zone -- maybe 7 blocks by 5 blocks. That restriction didn't seem to hamper business much. There was one private coffee shop, many restaurants, gift shops, touristy things, a couple of small clothing stores.
I think Main Street USA has its place, and we should try to maintain that in the very center of the city. But it doesn't hold further out, especially if there's not a built in clientele of students walking around every day. Putting moratorium on new residences strikes me as stupid. If you want business, you need people. Keeping the city authentic is as simple as setting up zoning laws on how the new buildings must look.
__________________
1987 325 eta |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,868
|
__________________
Downshift |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,980
|
That's funny.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Just read Trump's new book.
Did you all know that there are more starbucks in China then the US.
__________________
1967 911R "Clone" Race Car 2.0 & 2.5 Twin Plug 1984 Mercedes 500 SEC 1991 Mercedes 420 SEL 1992 Ford F-350 Dually 28' Pace Trailer |
||
|
|
|
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,611
|
Only five, for 28,000 people?
In Seattle, that would cause a riot! Every intersection in Seattle must have a minimum of two Starbucks locations. City code. The other two corners are reserved for independant espresso stands. Some intersections have a Starbucks on three corners. they have been grandfathered in. And every one of them has people lined up waiting. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,611
|
I'd explain it further, but I gotta go find some coffee.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I read an article in WSJ last week, and there is a corner in San Francisco that does have one on 3 corners of an intersection, and they looked at doing the 4th corner, but it wasn't feasible, but not due to foot traffic.
Believe it's Mission and 4th. e
__________________
http://www.autoforeignservices.com/ 57 Speedster, (4) 67S coupe's, (2) 67S targas, 68L Rally car etc. etc. |
||
|
|
|
|
A Man of Wealth and Taste
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Out there somewhere beyond the doors of perception
Posts: 51,063
|
Just think of all the gasoline I save by not having to wait my turn in the drivthrough lane. I get my daily excercise by walking to get my coffee..all the way to the kitchen and back...whew I'm exhausted think I need a pick me up joe.
__________________
Copyright "Some Observer" |
||
|
|
|