| legion |
04-16-2016 05:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Usmellgass2?
(Post 3329956)
I don't see it as a stupid decision making process. He was probably shocked that he didn't sail this right through the legal system, because it is common practice. It takes place ivery day in cases ranging from private land use, traffic code, on up to cases like Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians. I remember like it was yesterday when Janet Reno claimed she was defending the children when she burned them all alive. This is the face of Fascism.
|
This. Every month or two, someone is set free in who was convicted of a crime decades ago in Chicago. Some evidence the convicted has been asking for finally gets looked at. I've heard of people being in prison for 20, 30, even 50 years before exoneration. This is why the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Unfortunately, in most courtrooms, this usually devolves into "they must be prosecuting this person for a good reason"--and the prosecutor gets their conviction.
|