![]() |
Alonso and Hamilton
I'll bet there are abour four F1 teams scouring kart races for 10 year olds to sign up for long term development. It'll be like the development Canada does in hockey - from midgets to NHL.
from Autosport - interesting comments from 4 time WDC Prost. "Four-time champion Prost, who had a spectacular falling-out with teammate Ayrton Senna in 1988 and 1989 when McLaren dominated the sport, reckons the situation could hurt the team. "I think now having two equal cars within the same team is a mistake. In the end it will hurt them because it generates too much tension," Prost told El Pais newspaper in an interview on Monday. Prost also believes Hamilton, leading the championship by ten points after two consecutive wins, is benefiting from the time spent in McLaren's simulator. "The simulator has reached an amazing perfection, it's even capable of simulating weather conditions, the rain, the wet asphalt, everything," the Frenchman added. "And Hamilton has worked with the simulator a lot more than Alonso, and his driving style is very smooth, less rough than the Spaniard. I think that's why for McLaren is easier to set up the car for Hamilton's style." Fifty-two year-old Prost, who retired from the sport in 1993, admitted he is not happy with Formula One's current status, and he believes too much technology is ruining the racing. "Now it's not the same. Back in my days, the driver was more important than the car; now, it's technology first and then the driver's hands," Prost said. "The cars are so equally matched because of the limitations and the technological advances that make overtaking so hard. "The races are decided in the pits. The strategies are decisive in Formula One, the only thing that the teams can't take into account is driving errors." |
Re: Alonso and Hamilton
Quote:
|
The look Alonso gave to the camera after huging Hamilton (after they got out of the cars) is priceless. For driver error, Alonso's little 1 second wheel off cost him the opportunity of a win. So regardless of who pitted first, Alonso would have been second.
In regards to making F1 more interesting, personally I think they should remove the technological limits and allow the teams to go nuts with what ever money they can get. Then have something like 4 classes (think ALMS) so there is a large amount of passing lapped traffic. Also remove the blue flag, and force the lead cars to have to pass the slower ones. You will have plenty of action, lots of chances for human error, and performance/budget levels which allow for new teams to enter the series. |
You mean like remove the Traction Control in 2008?
Gonna be interesting next year fellas. |
I completely disagree with this: "I think now having two equal cars within the same team is a mistake. In the end it will hurt them because it generates too much tension..."
Competition breeds performance. If one guy is designated first string and the other second, there is no real competition. Heck, the most exciting moment of the race was when Alonso attempted to pass Hamilton. Had this been any other series, they would have traded places multiple times. |
So is Prost saying Hamilton has no natural talent? That all his ability is simulated because it was supposedly achieved with a simulator? :rolleyes:
BTW: in addition to the traction control being eliminated, I thought I heard something about the sequential gearbox also being done away with for a more traditional manual. You can have all the tech in the world, and still have a lousy race car. Toyota is proof of that. |
Quote:
Alonso is worried because he has a up and coming world class driver in a car AS FAST AS HIS in the same team, and this is not what he bargained for when signing on with McLaren. |
If that's the case, tough *****, Alonso. There's always NASCAR.
|
Funny how we can read the same thing and come up with totally different opinions...
I read above that Prost is French so his opinion does not count ? Okay... But he's also 4 times world champion and has more driving talent in his pinkie than all the posters on this thread, so that gives his opinion some weight ;-) In his days, he had to fight Piquet, Mansell, Senna and others for the crown.. And I think he's specifically alluding to the fact that modern F1 do so much for the drivers (traction control, paddle shifter, etc) that a less experienced rookie (with talent, no doubt) is not really at much of a disadvantage compared to a 2 times WC like Alonso... Also bear in mind he lived though the nasty Senna-prost Era at McLaren with 2 World championships being decided by drivers pushing the other in the gravel trap, so he knows how nasty it can turn inside McLaren, Ron Dennis has not proven yet that he can manage 2 great drivers simultaneously!! I happen to agree that it will turn nasty soon... But as long as they don't take each other out, it's great fun to watch the resurgence of McLaren, and the incredible talent of Hamilton giving Fernando fits... Don;t rule him out though, the guy beat Schumi, he's resilient ! I think Prost is spot on, it smells like a remake of Prost-Senna runaway fight... And I think he's spot on the fact that today's F1s do too much, can't wait for next year with no Traction control... And I'd reintroduce a clutch pedal too ;-) |
Quote:
|
Losing the TCS next year is gonna' be awesome.
|
Quote:
I think Ron Dennis handled those two superstars pretty well, but as devils advocate, Lauda was on his way out and Prost was on his way up. I'd like to see F1 remove the wings completely. Undertray can be free, no moving parts (sliding skirts, etc) no barge boards or winglets. Get rid of the 13 inch wheels, 15 or larger for the back. 13's have no connection with modern tire technology, inasmuch as it relates to road cars. How are they going to control TCU? I heard talk about common ECM, but I can't imagine Mercedes or Renault allowing that. Common sense left the F1 circus decades ago. Just my 2 cents |
Personally, I'm waiting for the inevitable fireworks on-track. There will come a time, sooner than later I believe, when one of those two will lose his cool and they'll both be out. It'll be Prost-Senna all over again.
I like this kind of tension on one team. It'll be fun to watch. ;) |
Quote:
|
I meant one of them (or both) will take both of them out of a race, just like Prost and Senna did to each other to decide a championship - twice.
|
Some interesting takes on Prost's quote. Sometimes the better car or better fuel strategy or better tire strategy wins - not necessarily the better driver. Prost's point is not Hamilton is untalented - clearly he's a freak of nature and an amazing driver. I take Prost to mean - "here's another angle to consider when measuring Hamilton's debut season".
Hamilton has been groomed for ten plus years - its a perfect storm of talent and training. It's not that they don't have identical cars. They don't. F1 cars aren't set up the same - they are set up according for each driver. Different design choices reinforces different driving styles. I think he's right about team drivers competing against each other, tho. That's one of the reasons Schumacher / Ferrari was so dominant. Everything was in support of the number one. No diluting of engineering and preparation within the team. Team wise, it makes a lot of sense and I still don't understand why Mac and Williams have this thing about drivers fighting each other within the same team. Seems a waste of resources. Makes for some exciting seasons, tho. With regard to technology in F1 versus driver input. I'm all for technology and advancement. I just think the balance between engineering/money and driver has leaned to far away from driving skill. It only makes sense for manufacturers wanting to have maximum impact per dollar spent. I'd just prefer to see the technological input be regulated more towards mechanical grip and less towards aero grip. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Off season broadcasts of Austrailian racing plus some reruns or synopsis versions of some of the series racing (like the SCCA Runoffs) is a lot more fun to watch. |
The second, third, fourth cars are exponentially cheaper after you R&D and build the first one. Teams run multiple cars for multiple data points - especially in practice - each car can run different programs and work towards a consensus on race setup and strategy. It's also a requirement for each constructor in F1.
|
And let's not forget that Mc Laren (and others, like WIlliams) value the constructor's championship over the driver's ! So 2 cars finishing intact is better than both drivers taking each other out... It's coming though, I know it... Alonso is gonna make a pass stick on hamilton who will close the door and boom... Or vice versa ;-)
Cue pissed off Ron Dennis, smiling Massa, and muttering raikonen "ImsohappyIfinishedsecondbutpleasesomebodygivemeas trondrinknow"... |
Put them all in matching karts and Hamilton would still win. He is incredible and I am pretty sure he is quicker than anyone.
Remember when Senna, a young newcomer raced in a Mercedes 190 series and he beat everyone! Jim Clark was the same. Give him anything and he will beat everyone... Prost is one to talk. He came up via the EFL drivers challenge and now he thinks that cars are too advance. I think he took over the FW14 from Nigel and that was pretty easy then. When he was racing for Ferrari he was always in the middle of the pack... Hate it when people compare different era of sports. Yes Kareem would have killed Shaq.... Who knows.... |
Yet another take on the Hamilton and Alonso relationship - (autosport)
"Alonso has rubbished suggestions that he is unhappy the team allow both drivers full access to each other's data. It was Alonso's information from Friday practice at Indianapolis that helped Hamilton make a step forward in his pace, especially in the track's middle sector, from Saturday. "The team does a good job in that aspect," said Alonso. "Since he is new in the category and he doesn't know the tracks, on Fridays he gets all the data from my car and my laps so he knows the circuit better and knows where the time is found." I think the summer season will be hot! hot! hot! |
I think Alonso might be happier at my favorite team - Ferrari! ;)
|
You never know, the latest silly season rumor has Kimi to Toyota for huge dollars and Alonso to Ferrari!
|
HAS HAMMIE MADE A MISTAKE YET??
even a minor one? I like F A but he blew one corner 4 times in canada and had a minor off at indy while his team mate just drives smooth and fast without putting a wheel wrong if that keeps up we will have a new rookie champ the best thing about this year is kimmie fans shuting up about the great iceman as it looks like he is melting a little I just wish the frogs and honda would return to being a threat to win |
>HAS HAMMIE MADE A MISTAKE YET??
even a minor one? Yes, he hit the walls are monaco 5 or 6 times... He was lucky the car did not break. But admittedly, he's impressively mistake-free for a rookie ! I still think Alonso will fight back - let's not forget that at most tracks, Alonso's setup and data is of great help to Hamilton ! I would not bury the twice WC yet... But it sure is fun to watch the kid kick his butt ! The "frogs" - the mostly british team running an italian and finnish driver - apparently have made another step up duting testing this week, we shall see... I still think someone other than Fisichella might get more out of the car - Kova is starting to show some form finally ! No hope for Honda though, super aguri passed them for pete's sake ! |
nota - I was thinking the same thing, not only did FA have some "offs" he almost collected a few cars on his way back on. How he has not taken out Hamilton so far is beyond be with his heroic and lucky entrances back onto the track sideways with traffic around him.
I still think Kimi is an amazing driver, he had good pace last week, just a poor start and that cost him a podium finish. I am getting tired of saying "next week" over and over though. |
How he didn't take someone out on that Turn #1 incident where he cut the corner is beyond me. At first glance it looks like a bigtime reckless move, although there might have been an issue with car momentum and not being able to turn/slow down enough on the grass as he was careening over it. Even if so, it's attributable to driver error, not mechanical problems or a big conspiracy theory involving British mechanics favoring British drivers.
FA is talented, but he needs to remember where he came from, realize his own fallability/mortality and get his ass back in the simulator more. He needs to polish up the basics a bit and stop letting his ego drive for him. Then he and Hamilton would be VERY well-matched I think. |
I agree with Prost's observations that nowadays cars are easier to drive...
Cmon the average age of the F1 drivers is 27. We have 3 contenders for the WC below 25. A 19 year old qualified in the top 10s at his first race and he had not driven the car in 3 months. Hamilton is certainly a good talent but it makes me smile when they compare him to Senna, Prost and Schumacher. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website