Superman |
08-02-2007 10:18 AM |
One the one hand, it seems reasonable to assume Lance was doping. And perhaps he was. You'd think the odds are that he was doping. But......
He never failed a test. He was the most-tested athlete in history. This accusation has been leveled against him MANY times throughout his absolutely dominant reign as world cycling champion, and his reaction has been to submit to more testing. According to my understanding.
Also according to my understanding, Lance Armstrong is a physiological freak. It is as though God designed a body specifically for bicycle racing. His lung capacity is off the charts. The ability of his lungs (even considering their immense volume capacity) to deliver oxygen into his blood was also studied and the researchers were amazed. Then of course, his body's muscles' ability to burn that oxygen efficiently is similarly stunning. Doping might potentially enhance some of these characteristics, but not all. Some (at least some) of Lance Armstrong's physiological characteristics might have been impacted by doping. maybe. What we know with certainty is that his physiology is, independent of doping, simply and naturally beyond what we thought were the limits. As I say, he's a freak. Like the guys that can throw a baseball 100 mph. There aren't a hundred humans in America that can do that. Doping is a predictable accusation coming from athletes and teams that have been getting their asses handed to them regularly for years.
|