![]() |
+1
With all due respect, the comparison to English car is like comparing apples and oranges. |
All mechanical watches are kind of like buying an air cooled rear engine/rear drive car. It's taking yesterday's technology to the next level. On the other hand, like buying an air colled Porsche, a Rolex mechanical or similar watch, carries some advatages over the more modern technology.
First, there is no battery. That means it runs as long as you use it. When do bateries fail? When you need them the most. With a mechanical watch there's no dead watch just as you need it most. Second, for not having to keep a battery updated, Rolex and some of the other top end watches offer the most accurate time possible. I don't even know how accurate my Rolex and Omega are because I inevitably let one or the other run down before I am able to do a serious test on them. For the purposes of your average person, a Rolex/Tag/Omega/ etc. is as accurate as an atomic clock. Third. Rolex and their ilk are far more rubust and waterproof than any mass market quartz. Omega makes a quartz Seamaster and it's about the same price as the mechanical version. Any Rolex Oyster is waterproof to 300 meters, some specialty models are waterproof to a thousand meters or so and have helium release valves. Just in case you find yourself in a diving bell half a mile under the surface of the ocean. Any Tag/Rolex/Omega can take being run over by a car, dropped, kicked, pretty much anything and still run. And to bring them back to new you only need a service that polishes the crystal, polishes or replaces the band and bezel. And finally, they are mechanical. That means engineered to a degree that few things in today's world get engineered. They are works of art from the inside out. The engineering problem necessary to create a perpetual mechanical watch is stunning. It's about like creating an air cooled engine that meets today's emissions standards. As an aside, Rolex did manufacture a quartz line from about the late 70s through about the late 80s or early 90s. They packaged them with brochures that featured the hottest Porsche of the day - the 928. Most Rolex afficianados consider that very appropriate. The 928 is to the 911 what quartz watches are to the mechanical Rolex. |
Both of my Landmonsters are running quite nicely. The orange faced Landmonster is running +1 sec/day and the black face is running +4 sec/day.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1198291689.jpg |
ok, i love rolex! i have one. i wear a TUDOR most of the time. it is rolex's cheaper playful cousin. i loose a bit of accuracy, but i am not syncronizing with any delta force guys, or am i setting off a bomb anywhere. i walk through a door with reasonable accuracy, and i am a happy fool. never ever, have i had an appointment, and needed to the second accuracy. a rolex is just like a 911, classic!
my other watch is the most obnoxious gold oyster president. way too much bling for me. but it has value way beyond the dollar value for me. |
I got a Rolex as a gift over 20 years ago. A classic Oyster stainless. I can't ever see myself going out and buying one however I will admit to really enjoying it. It is a machine, timeless design and very rugged. I wore it for over 20 years every day and really abused it. It never gave any trouble. It went through a period of loosing a few seconds a day - maybe after a couple of months I would find it a few minutes behind. Took it in and paid hundreds (conveniently cannot remember the total but it was hundreds) to have it cleaned, crystal replaced and reset. Then it gained a couple of seconds a day - go figure.
Then one day I spotted and purchased a Casio G-Shock at a yard sale for $1. I took off the Roller and its been in the drawer ever since. I have since added two more G Shocks to my collection. They keep perfect time and are very light to wear. Both the Rolex, when worn, and the G-Shocks get cleaned and degreased with a nail brush and spray cleaner like simple green or SD-20 then blow dried with compressed air at least once or twice a week. Very rugged watches. |
Quote:
|
The one in the middle is a GW-9000A Multi-band 5 / Solar "Mudman". Syncs to USA, UK, GE, and both JP atomic clocks, it's my current favorite G-Shock. :D
|
If it's digital. It's not really a watch.
IMO. |
So you only see two "watches" in my pic, what would you call the middle one then?
|
GMT2 +2 Seconds in the last 24 hrs.
This watch is from the mid/late 90s, I bought it used about 4 years ago it does not appear to have been serviced since new. I wear it diving, swimming, showering, wrenching...just about everything, yes even that. The older watches needed more frequent service because of the lube that was used, newer ones with morden lube do not dry out as fast. |
Quote:
This is with several flavours of the GMT Master, Daytona and President. Quote:
I was lucky enough to find a local guy who used to work at Rolex and is now retired. He still has his tools and such and does all of mine now for about 40% what the factory guys do. If you do not service it on a regular basis they usually will do fine but should be cleaned and serviced every 10 years or so. Going longer means that they will not keep their accuracy and should a seal or such get old they can get moisture inside. Longer it stays there the more damage it can do and costs more for the repair and replacement parts. |
[QUOTE=87coupe;3660039]Both of my Landmonsters are running quite nicely. The orange faced Landmonster is running +1 sec/day and the black face is running +4 sec/day.QUOTE]
Are those quartz watches? I'd imagine they would be more accurate than +4 seconds. They are nice looking but I could not afford them. |
Quote:
If there are other things that need attention, like the bezel, dial, hands, whatever, they'll suggest replacing those as well. If you don't service a watch, sooner or later it will run so badly that it won't keep time well. It might even quit running altogether. Obvioulsy, the internal parts will wear more if the lubricant dries out, to the long term detriment of the parts. With a newer watch and modern lubricants, you can probably go longer between services than they recommend, especially if you only wear the watch every once in a while. It's analogous to changing the oil in a car. JR |
Quote:
Thsat said, who knows what they do at Rolex service. It takes years to make a Rolex, you know. |
Quote:
I've got a couple old Omegas, Rolex and two watches by little known manufacturers like Atlantic and Orsa. Some keep better time than others. People either seem to love or hate Rolex. They are not perfect, but their designs have stood the test of time and I've found mine to be bullet proof. Much like the 3.0 in my 911. |
On the servicing
You can send your Rolex or other high end swiss watch to the manufacturer's service center and you'll get the red carpet treatment and pay for it. or You can find a local watchmaker who can do the normal servicing and pay for only what you need. Like taking your Porsche to John Walker for service, which I do :D |
Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1198349859.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No, mechanical watches oscillate as well.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website