LSU or OSU
 

Who is gonna win?

LSU will probably win...I'm rooting for Ohio State, because of some here who are too excitied about LSU....

I use to date an LSU cheerleader, so I am a bit bias:D Pluse who good friend who is on the final stages of his cancer battle is a huge LSU fan:(

OSU by a late field goal.

Miles makes a couple questionable calls that cost em.

Went fishing with some boyz in Grand Isle, LA the weekend LSU played La Tech. They were having a hearing complex when I told them LSU would lose to Arkansas the next week, and there would be no need to get their hopes up about National Championship. Due to major malfunctions in the selection process, somehow the #9 team didn't make the jump over LSU after stomping the crap out of the #1 team in the land.

Needless to say, I'll be rooting for OSU just on a count of because.

if lsu doesn't win, then arkansas won't truly be the 'powerhouse' they showed so supremely to be in dallas yesterday................

Geaux Tigers!

One vote here for LSD.

Lsu

I think this says it all
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/dashman68/2008/01/03/You_Might_Be_A_Buckeye_an_Ohio_State_SmackDown

Indifferent; neither of them deserves to be "Champions". They're both very good teams, but neither of them would beat USC, for instance.

JP

Oh-oh...here it comes...:D

Of course not. The Patriots couldn't beat USC. The US Marine Corps would shudder in fear at the thought of facing USC, but that plucky Cardinal?

I think WVA would run all over THE Ohio State University, and probably beat LSWho?! as well.

JP

Call the NFL! They pay millions to guys with your kind of an eye for talent. Not many people can evaluate talent like you apparently can. That said, to be the best you have to beat the best. USC runs from quality opposition. Due to that, all we can use to judge this is your infallible word. Pope Slacker I has spoken.

R-kansas.

Yep, Arkansas is the kind of opposition the Trojans avoid. But they are tough on Notre Dame.

is it true that OSU has only beaten one SEC team since WWII?

So, if LSU wins, Kentucky is the "Best" because they beat the "Best" (and beat Arkansas, who also beat the "Best"). Hmmmmm.

If THE Ohio State University wins, Illinois is the "Best" because then they beat the "Best". -- and OSU is an "eeeeek!!! opposition!!! upon on the chair" prima donna if ever there was... wait, Notre Dame is up on the chair with them. Hardly a foe to vanquish if you're going to seriously claim to be the "Best" as a result...

Neither team can make a stronger claim to be the "best" than a half-dozen other teams... which is what I was saying earlier --> the winner of this game is not the "Best". They're the better team in that game, but there's certainly enough other legitimate contenders for "Best", that, but for this BCS fiction, there would be none of this synthetic "infallibility" or "certainty".

If your view amounts to the winner of this game is "infallibly" and/or "certainly" the best, find another Pope to follow, I can't be your shepherd. :D

They do pay guys millions of dollars to comment on college football, and many of them (including those East-Coast biased ESPN bastards) lament the fact that USC didn't get a title shot, WVA had a good claim, Georgia got dissed, VaTech and Missou got owned, and the LSU-OSU "contest" will not, in any possible outcome, establish the "best" by any other than a flawed synthetic benchmark.

I like LSU and dislike OSU, but I probably still won't watch most of the game, because the outcome is meaningless to me. MAO: The winner of this game will have a legitimate claim as one of the top 5 teams in the country; no more.

JP

+1

+2

+4

+8