Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Interesting demographics on Mac users (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/394795-interesting-demographics-mac-users.html)

island911 02-25-2008 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moses (Post 3790969)
BootCamp or Parallels. Your intel-based Mac will boot Windows as a native OS. Anything that will work on a PC works on a Mac.

Sure, it will works. But most won't work well. For example, a windows based 3-d engineering program like SolidWorks (www.solidworks.com) will run emulated . . . with a performance hit of ~50% ... and with graphics that look like hell.

Clearly, Apple want's to prop up the notion of Windows apps running well on the Mac OS. .. but that is just not the reality.

TheMentat 02-25-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stomachmonkey (Post 3791116)
Yeah, I hear that. I have been starving for years but am so attached to how cool my Mac makes me that I figured it was worth it.

It's just so difficult to get by on a 6 figure salary. Personally grossed north of $200k last year from work done on my Mac.

Gave my overflow work to a bud, put $130k in his pocket for FY07. Kept 10% for the lead and managing the client.

Worked on a rush project Fri/Sat. Gave the client a deal on it. $10k for two days work. Really sucks.

Times are so tough.

I'm sure I speak for everybody here when I say:

"We're very happy for you!"

SmileWavy

Moses 02-25-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moses (Post 3790969)
Your intel-based Mac will boot Windows as a native OS.

Who said anything about an emulation program?

kstar 02-25-2008 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by island911 (Post 3791136)
Sure, it will works. But most won't work well. For example, a windows based 3-d engineering program like SolidWorks (www.solidworks.com) will run emulated . . . with a performance hit of ~50% ... and with graphics that look like hell.

Clearly, Apple want's to prop up the notion of Windows apps running well on the Mac OS. .. but that is just not the reality.

How many times do we need to tell you? :)

It's not "emulation" - it's "virtualization". There's a huge difference, especially on software that runs on the same hardware with the only difference being the OS like most PC vs. Mac situations.

Maybe you'll get it this time? :)

Quote:

Emulation involves emulating the virtual machines hardware and architecture. Microsoft's VirtualPC is an example of an emulation based virtual machine. It emulates the x86 architecture, and adds a layer of indirection and translation at the guest level, which means VirtualPC can run on different chipsets, like the PowerPC, in addition to the x86 architecture. However, that layer of indirection slows down the virtual machine significantly.

Virtualization, on the other hand, involves simply isolating the virtual machine within memory. The host instance simply passes the execution of the guest virtual machine directly to the native hardware. Without the translation layer, the performance of a virtualization virtual machine is much faster and approaches native speeds. However, since the native hardware is used, the chipset of the virtual machine must match. Usually, this means the Intel x86 architecture. VMWare is an example of this type of application for Windows.
Source: http://blog.1530technologies.com/2006/08/virtual_machine.html


Seriously, you guys need to back up your anti-Mac dogma with something solid.

Best,

Kurt

Mule 02-25-2008 11:17 AM

Dollars for starters. Mac prices are ridiculous. So a Mac notebook edges out a Dell by 1 point & how many dollars? Accessories are extremely limited compared to a PC & often twice the price. Repairs (yeah , I know they survive nuclear blasts) are ridiculous because everything is proprietary. And what does all this money buy me, in addition to the coolness?

kstar 02-25-2008 11:35 AM

Mule, 10 years ago you would have been right.

The inside of a Mac is about the same as the inside of a PC these days, even the Intel chips. I do not know of any proprietary parts in a Mac; if you do I would honestly be interested to know what they are.

Macs and PCs are price about evenly when you go feature for feature.

What accessories? Macs have USB and Firewire like PCs, and run most periphs that PCs run.

The Mac vs. PC debate should really be focused on OS X vs. Windows because that is where the material differences are, IMO.

Best,

Kurt

stomachmonkey 02-25-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791195)
Dollars for starters. Mac prices are ridiculous. So a Mac notebook edges out a Dell by 1 point & how many dollars? Accessories are extremely limited compared to a PC & often twice the price. Repairs (yeah , I know they survive nuclear blasts) are ridiculous because everything is proprietary. And what does all this money buy me, in addition to the coolness?

Not correct.

Mule 02-25-2008 11:37 AM

Correct!

Seric 02-25-2008 11:39 AM

You know what's always irritated me about the whole "Mac vs. PC" thing? PC stands for Personal Computer, which is what a Mac is as well. Primarily, PC means Windows computer, so why couldn't they of just said "Mac vs. Windows"? Sad thing is, I've been saying this since 1995.

Meh.

Stupid.

kstar 02-25-2008 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791233)
Correct!

Are you going religious on us now? :D

Best,

Kurt

stomachmonkey 02-25-2008 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791233)
Correct!

See not so hard to agree with me.

WI wide body 02-25-2008 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstarnes (Post 3791220)
Mule, 10 years ago you would have been right.

The inside of a Mac is about the same as the inside of a PC these days, even the Intel chips. I do not know of any proprietary parts in a Mac; if you do I would honestly be interested to know what they are.

Macs and PCs are price about evenly when you go feature for feature.

What accessories? Macs have USB and Firewire like PCs, and run most periphs that PCs run.

The Mac vs. PC debate should really be focused on OS X vs. Windows because that is where the material differences are, IMO.

Best, Kurt

So your best guess is that Mule is only about 10 years behind the curve?;)

stomachmonkey 02-25-2008 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstarnes (Post 3791220)
Mule, 10 years ago you would have been right.

The inside of a Mac is about the same as the inside of a PC these days, even the Intel chips. I do not know of any proprietary parts in a Mac; if you do I would honestly be interested to know what they are.

Macs and PCs are price about evenly when you go feature for feature.

What accessories? Macs have USB and Firewire like PCs, and run most periphs that PCs run.

The Mac vs. PC debate should really be focused on OS X vs. Windows because that is where the material differences are, IMO.

Best,

Kurt

Correct.

Nathans_Dad 02-25-2008 11:54 AM

I'm a Mac convert, made the switch about 2 years ago. I am conservative, have 3 kids, go to work everyday, have never hugged a tree in my life and eat meat on a daily basis.

I am considering voting for Obama over McCain tho...GASP...it must be the MAC!!!!

Mule 02-25-2008 11:55 AM

So all pc accessories work on Macs now too? You may have me here because I wrote off Macs years ago. If this is accurate, which I haven't seen, it's pretty damn recent. I've been using computers longer than some of you have been alive. My original statement was absolutely true for virtually all of that time. If Apple has finally decided to stop drilling their customers, that doesn't incline me to run out & get one.

WI wide body 02-25-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathans_Dad (Post 3791269)
I'm a Mac convert, made the switch about 2 years ago. I am conservative, have 3 kids, go to work everyday, have never hugged a tree in my life and eat meat on a daily basis.

I am considering voting for Obama over McCain tho...GASP...it must be the MAC!!!!

Nah, you're okay N-Dad. My youngest son got into Macs back in the 1980's at SIU. He ended up a computer graphics designer (mostly in advertising) and he's an agnostic (even tho he graduated from a Catholic HS) who is somewhat of a social lib (but who disdains politics) and a few years back he was participating (to his mother's horror) in ToughMan contests!

So compared to him you are abnormally normal!!

stevepaa 02-25-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791275)
So all pc accessories work on Macs now too? You may have me here because I wrote off Macs years ago. If this is accurate, which I haven't seen, it's pretty damn recent.

not really. I never knew of accessories for Wintel machines that would not connect to a MAC. What accessory was it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791275)
I've been using computers longer than some of you have been alive. My original statement was absolutely true for virtually all of that time.

Repairs are virtually non existant on a MAC and easily done if needed. Except for recently, Wintel machines were basically a piece of crap. The back room was full of hardware that broke down, monitors that crapped out, etc within a year of getting the newest 386 machines. That is when I bought my first MAC and it lasted years longer than the 386 was ever used at work. BTW, I first started programming in 1965.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791275)
If Apple has finally decided to stop drilling their customers, that doesn't incline me to run out & get one.

Short term thinking led many to buy wintel machines.

Mule 02-25-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevepaa (Post 3791329)
not really. I never knew of accessories for Wintel machines that would not connect to a MAC. What accessory was it?



Repairs are virtually non existant on a MAC and easily done if needed. Except for recently, Wintel machines were basically a piece of crap. The back room was full of hardware that broke down, monitors that crapped out, etc within a year of getting the newest 386 machines. That is when I bought my first MAC and it lasted years longer than the 386 was ever used at work. BTW, I first started programming in 1965.




Short term thinking led many to buy wintel machines.

Steve, respectfully, for most of the Mac's lifetime, software availability was MAYBE 10% of that available for a PC. Second, I don't know what kind of machines you were buying. I was in the network business for about 12 years & laser printer supplies & service for another 15. PCs are reliable. A power supply here & there, maybe HD or a video card, but that's about it. Don't tell me Macs don't have these problems. I know better.

If now, Mac has made what amounts to a PC & put their operating system on it, hurray for them. That doesn't make up for 20 yrs of such severe limitations & gross overpricing. Don't believe me? Look at the market. Apple doesn't have 5% by accident.

Moses 02-25-2008 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791340)
Apple doesn't have 5% by accident.

The other 95% is so... ordinary. ;)

Mule 02-25-2008 12:42 PM

Mac=Starbucks. Over hyped, not that good compared to real quality.

RANDY P 02-25-2008 12:45 PM

Starbucks tastes like Battery Acid.

That video actually looks like a lot of urban Seattle's under 35 crowd - to a tee.

rjp

Moses 02-25-2008 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791362)
Mac=Starbucks. Over hyped, not that good compared to real quality.

Nah. Mac is more like Peets. Windows is like Chock Full 'o Nuts.

gprsh924 02-25-2008 12:47 PM

I'd like my next laptop (1-2 years away) to be a mac, but in order for that to happen, it will have to price out within $150 of a similarly spec'd tell. When I got mine 18 months ago, my Dell was over $300 cheaper than the very similar MacBooks that all my friends got. So far everything has worked out for me.

The other thing I dislike about Macs is the keyboard. I really don't like how it is flat, I wish it had some definition between the keys, although I suppose I would get used to it over time.

Moses 02-25-2008 12:50 PM

It really is pretty simple.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1203976219.jpg


or...


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1203976242.jpg

stevepaa 02-25-2008 12:52 PM

Mule, I have heard the software argument for 15 years. For work related stuff a MAC was and is fine. Lockheed was all MAC for general work until they were consumed by Martin. CAD was done on SUN or some other special workstation computer.

The problem that plagued wintel machines, 386, 486, etc., was the lack of uniform hardware specifications, like the MAC had. The IT guy would try two different HDs and then two different HD driver boards until he could find a pair that would work together. That same issue continues now. I had an IBM laptop two years ago for which I had to spend two weeks back and forth with IBM Software group to finally find the right patch to make the IBM wireless card work. Ridiculous.

Note, I try not to call wintel machines "PC" as in reality Apple created the first personal computer, PC, but lost the marketing logo to IBM.

Over the life of the computer, the cost per year is less on a MAC, always has been, always will be. The quality is built in.

What Apple has done is switched to Intel chips. The current MACs can run the best PC OS, MAC, or run XP, and Vista better than on wintel machine. You deserve it to yourself to take another look.

gassy 02-25-2008 12:57 PM

Mule = Yawn. bababababababababababababababa

stomachmonkey 02-25-2008 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3791340)
Apple doesn't have 5% by accident.

Actually they have 6.1. Right behind Gateways 6.4 and ahead of every other PC manufacturer sans Dell and HP.

A huge chunk of Dell and HPs 20+ share comes from supplying corp america with servers and run of the mill desktops for the workers.

Apple and the others do not compete in that category so it's an unfair comparison.

It's like dinging Porsche for their lack of market share in the front end loader market. Can't count it f they don't compete in it.

WI wide body 02-25-2008 01:10 PM

Yeah, all those PC's and Microsoft stuff was soooooo reliable and trouble free.

stevepaa 02-25-2008 01:11 PM

It is quite evident that the reason MACS are less than 10% of the "PC" market compared to Wintel machines is the numerous low cost and cheap machines issued by too many "PC" manufacturers, i.e. garage assemblers, that saturated the market with cheap machines in the 90's. Wintel bought the market place. The momentum was huge and businesses bought poorly made wintel machines for many years based upon short term fiscal analysis.


That is also a commentary on MS, Bill Gates. He is in business for the buck, first, last and the only reason he went into the business. Quality doesn't even come into the picture.

WI wide body 02-25-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevepaa (Post 3791437)
It is quite evident that the reason MACS are less than 10% of the "PC" market compared to Wintel machines is the numerous low cost and cheap machines issued by too many "PC" manufacturers, i.e. garage assemblers, that saturated the market with cheap machines in the 90's. Wintel bought the market place. The momentum was huge and businesses bought poorly made wintel machines for many years based upon short term fiscal analysis.

My computer smarts are just about equal to Mule's Super Bowl knowledge but my kid insists that if not for the Apple guys there would be no Billy Gates empire today...or if the Apple guys had known how to take control of the market as did Microsoft. That's his opinion.

Seahawk 02-25-2008 01:18 PM

So, Mac'ers: My son starts High School next year and wants a Mac/Apple laptop, which one do you recommend?

I have absolutely nnooo dog in this fight. I think computers are essential in HS so he gets one just like his older sister...she wanted an HP, he doesn't.

Since DoD is MS, I've always gone that route so I know nothing about Macs.

Now, MacDonald's, I'm good to go.;)

Moses 02-25-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 3791451)
So, Mac'ers: My son starts High School next year and wants a Mac/Apple laptop, which one do you recommend?

I have absolutely nnooo dog in this fight. I think computers are essential in HS so he gets one just like his older sister...she wanted an HP, he doesn't.

Since DoD is MS, I've always gone that route so I know nothing about Macs.

Now, MacDonald's, I'm good to go.;)

ANY Mac laptop will do what he needs. The only software he'll need is the Microsoft Office suite. I've heard that it can be downloaded, free, at Limewire.

stomachmonkey 02-25-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WI wide body (Post 3791446)
My computer smarts are just about equal to Mule's Super Bowl knowledge but my kid insists that if not for the Apple guys there would be no Billy Gates empire today...or if the Apple guys had known how to take control of the market as did Microsoft. That's his opinion.

Actually Bill and Steve used to hang in the same circle and were a bit more than just acquaintances.

The "Big Bang" for Microsoft was due in large part to a critical mistake by IBM.

Apple pretty much owned the PC market at the time. IBM wanted a taste of it. Macs were proprietary as was the OS. No opportunity to reverse engineer it.

IBM rushed out a box built with off the shelf chips (mistake 1, see reverse engineer) then went shopping for an OS which they got through Bill.

Mistake 2 was IBM's position that the OS did not matter, it was about the hardware so IBM licensed the OS from MSFT instead of buying it outright.

That left the door wide open for knock offs (enter Toshiba) that ran the same OS as IBM's boxes and by extension the same applications.

The rest as they say is history.

stevepaa 02-25-2008 01:27 PM

http://www.apple.com/macbook/ is all he will need for many years to come. It will also run most if not all wintel specific code that a school may require for use.

motion 02-25-2008 01:38 PM

In addition, he can use it for 2-3 years then sell it for 50-70% of what he paid for it. Not kidding.... one of the benefits of Mac ownership :)

kstar 02-25-2008 01:45 PM

Seahawk - my Daughter (9yo) has a MacBook that I got her a bit over a year ago; she's an ace on it. She's rough on the machine and it has survived and has not required any service. She does her own software updates and gets around the file system very well. She can also make a slideshow, movie and even create songs on Garage Band and has her own website created on iWeb.

Her school is also all Mac, so the choice was even easier for us.

On the superficial side, none of her friends get excited when someone gets a new PC (Windows). :)

Best,

Kurt

Mule 02-25-2008 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevepaa (Post 3791437)
It is quite evident that the reason MACS are less than 10% of the "PC" market compared to Wintel machines is the numerous low cost and cheap machines issued by too many "PC" manufacturers, i.e. garage assemblers, that saturated the market with cheap machines in the 90's. Wintel bought the market place. The momentum was huge and businesses bought poorly made wintel machines for many years based upon short term fiscal analysis.


That is also a commentary on MS, Bill Gates. He is in business for the buck, first, last and the only reason he went into the business. Quality doesn't even come into the picture.

Steve, I was there. The only reason Apple even exists today is that they used to give them away to schools in hopes that on graduation, the kids would continue to use them. The better clones "garage machines" were as reliable as any Mac ever built. Spin it how you like. I'll help, 94.9 percent of the market is not smart enough to figure out what you all did. I'm done.:)

WI wide body 02-25-2008 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stomachmonkey (Post 3791464)

Actually Bill and Steve used to hang in the same circle and were a bit more than just acquaintances. .

Can you elucidate on this please? They certainly never refer to it in any of the articles I've seen.

lendaddy 02-25-2008 01:49 PM

We just got the a Macbook Pro and I feel 10 years younger, I've added 15 yards to my drive and I can eat spicy food again!

Highly recommended.

kstar 02-25-2008 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lendaddy (Post 3791527)
We just got the a Macbook Pro and I feel 10 years younger, I've added 15 yards to my drive and I can eat spicy food again!

Highly recommended.

Improvements in both length AND girth, too?

Best,

Kurt :cool:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.